Institutionalizing barriers to access? An equity scan of green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) incentive programs in the United States

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Marissa Matsler, Michael H. Finewood, Ruthann Richards, Olivia Pierce, Zenya Ledermann
{"title":"Institutionalizing barriers to access? An equity scan of green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) incentive programs in the United States","authors":"Marissa Matsler, Michael H. Finewood, Ruthann Richards, Olivia Pierce, Zenya Ledermann","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2023.2167814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) is part of a suite of sustainability initiatives that are vital to tackling climate change. However, siloed governance structures that traditionally implement stormwater infrastructure are not well-suited to address the cross-cutting goals of such initiatives (i.e. incorporating social equity along with technological aspects). Equity planning centers social equity in policy development and can help ameliorate this siloing. Here, we apply equity planning concepts to examine GSI incentive programs developed in the United States to address current funding gaps. We explore GSI incentive programs included in federally-mandated Stormwater Management Plans (SWMPs). Programs found through a scan of readily available SWMPs ranged from $20 rebates to $500,000 grants, providing a range of opportunities. However, closer analysis of application materials suggests potential institutionalization of inequality through restricted access. Barriers to accessing these programs can limit participation by marginalized or under-resourced communities and instead redirect scarce resources to communities who already have strong capacity. Thus, we argue that centering equity in the development of sustainability incentives and conducting meaningful equity analysis should be applied to GSI programs to reform practice and avoid institutionalizing inequity.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"31 1","pages":"413 - 428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2023.2167814","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) is part of a suite of sustainability initiatives that are vital to tackling climate change. However, siloed governance structures that traditionally implement stormwater infrastructure are not well-suited to address the cross-cutting goals of such initiatives (i.e. incorporating social equity along with technological aspects). Equity planning centers social equity in policy development and can help ameliorate this siloing. Here, we apply equity planning concepts to examine GSI incentive programs developed in the United States to address current funding gaps. We explore GSI incentive programs included in federally-mandated Stormwater Management Plans (SWMPs). Programs found through a scan of readily available SWMPs ranged from $20 rebates to $500,000 grants, providing a range of opportunities. However, closer analysis of application materials suggests potential institutionalization of inequality through restricted access. Barriers to accessing these programs can limit participation by marginalized or under-resourced communities and instead redirect scarce resources to communities who already have strong capacity. Thus, we argue that centering equity in the development of sustainability incentives and conducting meaningful equity analysis should be applied to GSI programs to reform practice and avoid institutionalizing inequity.
将准入障碍制度化?美国绿色雨水基础设施(GSI)激励计划的公平扫描
绿色雨水基础设施(GSI)是一系列可持续发展举措的一部分,对应对气候变化至关重要。然而,传统上实施雨水基础设施的孤立治理结构并不适合解决此类倡议的交叉目标(即将社会公平与技术方面结合起来)。公平规划以政策制定中的社会公平为中心,有助于改善这种孤立现象。在这里,我们运用股权规划的概念来研究在美国开发的GSI激励计划,以解决当前的资金缺口。我们探讨了联邦政府授权的雨水管理计划(SWMPs)中包含的GSI激励计划。通过扫描现成的swmp发现的项目从20美元的回扣到50万美元的赠款,提供了一系列的机会。然而,对申请材料的进一步分析表明,限制入学可能会使不平等现象制度化。进入这些项目的障碍可能会限制边缘化或资源不足社区的参与,反而会将稀缺资源重新分配给已经具备强大能力的社区。因此,我们认为,在可持续发展激励机制的发展中,应以公平为中心,进行有意义的公平分析,以改革实践,避免将不公平制度化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信