Carbon Emissions from Container Shipping: An Analysis of New Empirical Evidence

IF 0.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 ECONOMICS
M. Acciaro, A. McKinnon
{"title":"Carbon Emissions from Container Shipping: An Analysis of New Empirical Evidence","authors":"M. Acciaro, A. McKinnon","doi":"10.1400/234302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decade researchers have been looking at ways of reducing the carbon intensity of shipping operations that globally account for approximately 3 % of world carbon emissions. As a result of regulation and firms’ efforts to innovate, the maritime sector has introduced new technologies and practices such as slow steaming which have contributed to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the atmosphere. The impact of technological and operational developments on global GHG emissions is difficult to assess, however, without empirical evidence. So far such evidence has been only partially available and most of the data sources used in the literature have been compiled for different purposes or are based on single firm case studies. This paper reports the results of an analysis of a fuel consumption database compiled by the BSR Clean Cargo Working Group (CCWG) with the specific purpose of benchmarking and collecting emission data and comprising 2,300 container ship voyages (reporting year 2013, data for 2012). This analysis has examined the effect of technical and operational parameters on these vessels’ fuel consumption and emissions and is the first to be performed on the dataset and in general on self-reported data across multiple companies. In 2012, carriers in the CCWG accounted for approximately 65% of total world deep-sea container traffic. The paper outlines an econometric model that regresses carbon emissions from container shipping on particular trade routes against a range of independent variables, such as vessel age, size and average speed. The paper results indicate that significant differences exist among carriers both in terms of energy efficiency and carbon intensity. The analysis also suggests that while the emission profiles of some trade routes have remained relatively stable in recent years, others have witnessed an increase in emissions mainly as a result of a concentration of container flows. By improving our understanding of the determinants of carbon emissions from container shipping, this research should help shipping lines develop carbon-reduction plans and governments to devise appropriate policies to incentivise the decarbonisation of the maritime sector.","PeriodicalId":44910,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transport Economics","volume":"88 1 1","pages":"211-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transport Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/234302","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In the last decade researchers have been looking at ways of reducing the carbon intensity of shipping operations that globally account for approximately 3 % of world carbon emissions. As a result of regulation and firms’ efforts to innovate, the maritime sector has introduced new technologies and practices such as slow steaming which have contributed to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the atmosphere. The impact of technological and operational developments on global GHG emissions is difficult to assess, however, without empirical evidence. So far such evidence has been only partially available and most of the data sources used in the literature have been compiled for different purposes or are based on single firm case studies. This paper reports the results of an analysis of a fuel consumption database compiled by the BSR Clean Cargo Working Group (CCWG) with the specific purpose of benchmarking and collecting emission data and comprising 2,300 container ship voyages (reporting year 2013, data for 2012). This analysis has examined the effect of technical and operational parameters on these vessels’ fuel consumption and emissions and is the first to be performed on the dataset and in general on self-reported data across multiple companies. In 2012, carriers in the CCWG accounted for approximately 65% of total world deep-sea container traffic. The paper outlines an econometric model that regresses carbon emissions from container shipping on particular trade routes against a range of independent variables, such as vessel age, size and average speed. The paper results indicate that significant differences exist among carriers both in terms of energy efficiency and carbon intensity. The analysis also suggests that while the emission profiles of some trade routes have remained relatively stable in recent years, others have witnessed an increase in emissions mainly as a result of a concentration of container flows. By improving our understanding of the determinants of carbon emissions from container shipping, this research should help shipping lines develop carbon-reduction plans and governments to devise appropriate policies to incentivise the decarbonisation of the maritime sector.
集装箱航运的碳排放:一个新的实证分析
在过去的十年中,研究人员一直在寻找降低航运业务碳强度的方法,全球航运业务约占全球碳排放量的3%。由于监管和公司的创新努力,海事部门引入了新技术和实践,如慢速航行,有助于减少大气中的温室气体(GHG)排放。然而,如果没有经验证据,很难评估技术和业务发展对全球温室气体排放的影响。到目前为止,这种证据只是部分可用,文献中使用的大多数数据来源是为不同目的汇编的,或者是基于单一的公司案例研究。本文报告了BSR清洁货物工作组(CCWG)编制的燃料消耗数据库的分析结果,该数据库的具体目的是对基准和收集排放数据,包括2,300艘集装箱船航行(报告年度为2013年,数据为2012年)。该分析研究了技术和操作参数对这些船舶燃料消耗和排放的影响,这是第一次在数据集上进行分析,通常是在多家公司的自我报告数据上进行分析。2012年,CCWG的承运商约占全球深海集装箱运输量的65%。这篇论文概述了一个计量经济学模型,该模型将特定贸易路线上集装箱运输的碳排放量与一系列独立变量(如船龄、尺寸和平均航速)进行回归。研究结果表明,不同载体在能源效率和碳强度方面存在显著差异。分析还表明,虽然近年来一些贸易路线的排放情况保持相对稳定,但其他贸易路线的排放量增加,主要是由于集装箱流量的集中。通过提高我们对集装箱航运碳排放决定因素的理解,这项研究应该有助于航运公司制定碳减排计划,帮助政府制定适当的政策来激励海事部门的脱碳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信