Using Personality Detection Tools for Software Engineering Research: How Far Can We Go?

Fabio Calefato, F. Lanubile
{"title":"Using Personality Detection Tools for Software Engineering Research: How Far Can We Go?","authors":"Fabio Calefato, F. Lanubile","doi":"10.1145/3491039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing the personality of software engineers may help to match individual traits with the characteristics of development activities such as code review and testing, as well as support managers in team composition. However, self-assessment questionnaires are not a practical solution for collecting multiple observations on a large scale. Instead, automatic personality detection, while overcoming these limitations, is based on off-the-shelf solutions trained on non-technical corpora, which might not be readily applicable to technical domains like software engineering. In this article, we first assess the performance of general-purpose personality detection tools when applied to a technical corpus of developers’ e-mails retrieved from the public archives of the Apache Software Foundation. We observe a general low accuracy of predictions and an overall disagreement among the tools. Second, we replicate two previous research studies in software engineering by replacing the personality detection tool used to infer developers’ personalities from pull-request discussions and e-mails. We observe that the original results are not confirmed, i.e., changing the tool used in the original study leads to diverging conclusions. Our results suggest a need for personality detection tools specially targeted for the software engineering domain.","PeriodicalId":7398,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)","volume":"5 1","pages":"1 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3491039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Assessing the personality of software engineers may help to match individual traits with the characteristics of development activities such as code review and testing, as well as support managers in team composition. However, self-assessment questionnaires are not a practical solution for collecting multiple observations on a large scale. Instead, automatic personality detection, while overcoming these limitations, is based on off-the-shelf solutions trained on non-technical corpora, which might not be readily applicable to technical domains like software engineering. In this article, we first assess the performance of general-purpose personality detection tools when applied to a technical corpus of developers’ e-mails retrieved from the public archives of the Apache Software Foundation. We observe a general low accuracy of predictions and an overall disagreement among the tools. Second, we replicate two previous research studies in software engineering by replacing the personality detection tool used to infer developers’ personalities from pull-request discussions and e-mails. We observe that the original results are not confirmed, i.e., changing the tool used in the original study leads to diverging conclusions. Our results suggest a need for personality detection tools specially targeted for the software engineering domain.
在软件工程研究中使用个性检测工具:我们能走多远?
评估软件工程师的个性可能有助于将个人特征与开发活动的特征相匹配,例如代码审查和测试,以及团队组成中的支持经理。然而,自我评估问卷并不是一个实际的解决方案,以收集多个观察大规模。相反,自动人格检测在克服这些限制的同时,是基于非技术语料库训练的现成解决方案,这可能不容易适用于软件工程等技术领域。在本文中,我们首先评估了通用个性检测工具在应用于从Apache软件基金会的公共档案中检索到的开发人员电子邮件的技术语料库时的性能。我们观察到预测的总体准确性较低,并且工具之间存在总体分歧。其次,我们复制了之前在软件工程领域的两项研究,替换了用于从拉取请求讨论和电子邮件中推断开发人员性格的个性检测工具。我们观察到原始结果没有得到证实,即改变原始研究中使用的工具导致结论分歧。我们的研究结果表明,需要针对软件工程领域的个性检测工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信