Post‐cholecystectomy diarrhoea: New light on old problem

GastroHep Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1002/ygh2.492
H. Tsai
{"title":"Post‐cholecystectomy diarrhoea: New light on old problem","authors":"H. Tsai","doi":"10.1002/ygh2.492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Up to 10% of patients who have had cholecystectomies suffer from symptomatic diarrhoea. The mechanism of this diarrhoea is not fully understood. It is often assumed that the diarrhoea is caused by increased bile acid. The evidence for this is based on studies which show that twothirds of patients who experience diarrhoea after the operation have excess bile acid and respond to cholestyramine, a bile acid sequestrant.1 Other poorly understood neuroendocrine effects of cholecystectomy may also be contributory factor and may account for the remaining third of patients. The mechanism by which there is increased bile acid in the lower gut after cholecystectomy is unclear. There are several proposals: a faster enterohepatic recycling of bile acids with increased bile acid synthesis or a change in the composition of the bile acid pool could play a role. The bile synthesis rate may be assessed with plasma 7αhydroxy4cholesten3one (C4), whereas ileal reabsorption of bile acids may be assessed with plasma fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19).2 In patients with bile acid diarrhoea, lower fasting FGF19 and higher fasting C4 have been previously demonstrated. In this paper, Borup et al tries to shed more light into this intriguing condition.3 They measured FGF19 and C4 levels in 18 individuals before and after cholecystectomy. FGF19 is stimulated in the ileum in response to bile acid and is thus a useful biomarker for ileal bile acid load. They assessed their symptoms and looked at fasting and postprandial levels of FGF19 in these individuals before and after cholecystectomy. They demonstrated that fasting levels of FGF19 are unchanged but postprandial levels are significantly increased after cholecystectomy. They also found that fasting C4 levels to be unchanged after cholecystectomy in their cohort. These results are puzzling and could lead to a rethink as to the mechanism of postcholecystectomy diarrhoea. Unfortunately, none of the patients they studied had symptomatic diarrhoea. This is likely to be a statistical fluke and rather unfortunate as these results suggest that both bile acid production and recycling is increased after cholecystectomy. Perhaps if they could continue their studies and recruit a larger cohort they may start to further elucidate the pathophysiology of postcholecystectomy diarrhoea.","PeriodicalId":12480,"journal":{"name":"GastroHep","volume":"47 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GastroHep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ygh2.492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Up to 10% of patients who have had cholecystectomies suffer from symptomatic diarrhoea. The mechanism of this diarrhoea is not fully understood. It is often assumed that the diarrhoea is caused by increased bile acid. The evidence for this is based on studies which show that twothirds of patients who experience diarrhoea after the operation have excess bile acid and respond to cholestyramine, a bile acid sequestrant.1 Other poorly understood neuroendocrine effects of cholecystectomy may also be contributory factor and may account for the remaining third of patients. The mechanism by which there is increased bile acid in the lower gut after cholecystectomy is unclear. There are several proposals: a faster enterohepatic recycling of bile acids with increased bile acid synthesis or a change in the composition of the bile acid pool could play a role. The bile synthesis rate may be assessed with plasma 7αhydroxy4cholesten3one (C4), whereas ileal reabsorption of bile acids may be assessed with plasma fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19).2 In patients with bile acid diarrhoea, lower fasting FGF19 and higher fasting C4 have been previously demonstrated. In this paper, Borup et al tries to shed more light into this intriguing condition.3 They measured FGF19 and C4 levels in 18 individuals before and after cholecystectomy. FGF19 is stimulated in the ileum in response to bile acid and is thus a useful biomarker for ileal bile acid load. They assessed their symptoms and looked at fasting and postprandial levels of FGF19 in these individuals before and after cholecystectomy. They demonstrated that fasting levels of FGF19 are unchanged but postprandial levels are significantly increased after cholecystectomy. They also found that fasting C4 levels to be unchanged after cholecystectomy in their cohort. These results are puzzling and could lead to a rethink as to the mechanism of postcholecystectomy diarrhoea. Unfortunately, none of the patients they studied had symptomatic diarrhoea. This is likely to be a statistical fluke and rather unfortunate as these results suggest that both bile acid production and recycling is increased after cholecystectomy. Perhaps if they could continue their studies and recruit a larger cohort they may start to further elucidate the pathophysiology of postcholecystectomy diarrhoea.
胆囊切除术后腹泻:对老问题的新认识
高达10%的胆囊切除术患者出现症状性腹泻。这种腹泻的机制尚不完全清楚。通常认为腹泻是由胆汁酸增加引起的。有研究表明,手术后出现腹泻的患者中,有三分之二的患者胆汁酸过多,并对胆甾胺(一种胆汁酸隔离剂)有反应其他对胆囊切除术的神经内分泌影响知之甚少,也可能是一个促成因素,可能占其余三分之一的患者。胆囊切除术后下肠胆汁酸增加的机制尚不清楚。有几种建议:随着胆汁酸合成的增加,胆汁酸的肠肝循环更快或胆汁酸池组成的改变可能起作用。胆汁合成速率可用血浆7α -羟基胆甾醇31酮(C4)评估,胆汁酸的回肠重吸收可用血浆成纤维细胞生长因子19 (FGF19)评估在胆汁酸腹泻患者中,先前已证实空腹FGF19较低和空腹C4较高。在这篇论文中,Borup等人试图阐明这个有趣的情况他们测量了18个人胆囊切除术前后的FGF19和C4水平。FGF19在回肠中响应胆汁酸而受到刺激,因此是回肠胆汁酸负荷的有用生物标志物。他们评估了他们的症状,并观察了这些人在胆囊切除术前后的空腹和餐后FGF19水平。他们证明空腹FGF19水平不变,但胆囊切除术后餐后水平显著升高。他们还发现,在他们的队列中,胆囊切除术后空腹C4水平没有变化。这些结果令人困惑,并可能导致对胆囊切除术后腹泻机制的重新思考。不幸的是,他们研究的病人都没有出现症状性腹泻。这很可能是统计上的侥幸,而且相当不幸,因为这些结果表明胆囊切除术后胆汁酸的产生和循环都增加了。也许如果他们能够继续他们的研究并招募更大的队列,他们可能会开始进一步阐明胆囊切除术后腹泻的病理生理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信