RESPONSE OF SUDAN GRASS TO ORGANIC, INORGANIC AND BIO-FERTILIZERS

Yasar Abdalla, E. Awad, Atyat E. Nasralla, E. Osman, I. Mohamed
{"title":"RESPONSE OF SUDAN GRASS TO ORGANIC, INORGANIC AND BIO-FERTILIZERS","authors":"Yasar Abdalla, E. Awad, Atyat E. Nasralla, E. Osman, I. Mohamed","doi":"10.21608/zjar.2022.269582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This investigation was carried out at the experimental farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University through the growing summer season of 2019. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of inorganic, organic and bio-fertilization on plant growth and NPK content by successive four cuts of sudan grass plants grown in clayey soils. The most important findings could be summarized as follows: Generally, in most cases, adding any organic sources i.e., chicken manure (CM) or rabbit manure (RM) or Quail manure (QM) or farmyard manure (FYM) at the rate of 0.5% with50 % RD (NPK) plus inoculated by microbien (Mic.) gave the highest significant values of four cuts and accumulative fresh weight as well as N, P and K percentage of sudan grass grown in clay soil compared with control treatment. As a general view, the fresh weight and N percentage of sudan grass grown in clay soil was increased from 1 st cut to 2 nd one then decreased in 3 rd cut followed by last one using the control treatment or 100% RD (NPK) with or without microbien inoculated or 50% RD (NPK) with CM, QM, RM and FYM with microbien inoculated. The same trend was noticed for P% using the microbien inoculated with 50 % RD (NPK) or 50% RD (NPK) alone or control treatment. Also, the fresh weight of sudan grass was increased from 1st cut to 2nd one followed by 3rd cut then decreased in last one by adding the treatment of 50% RD (NPK) with QM or CM. Similar trend was obtained for N% by adding the 100% RD (NPK) with or without microbien inoculated or 50% RD (NPK) with Mic. The same trend was noticed for P% by adding 50% RD (NPK) plus 0.5% of any organic wastes with or without microbien inoculated. Similar trend was obtained for K% by adding 50% RD (NPK) plus 0.5% of any organic wastes with microbien inoculated compared with control treatment. In general, it could be stated that to increase forage production and its quality of sudan grass, mineral with organic and bio-fertilizer can be used at rate of 50% NPK mineral fertilizers with any organic wastes plus bio- fertilizer (microbien)under the same soil conditions.","PeriodicalId":23865,"journal":{"name":"Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/zjar.2022.269582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This investigation was carried out at the experimental farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University through the growing summer season of 2019. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of inorganic, organic and bio-fertilization on plant growth and NPK content by successive four cuts of sudan grass plants grown in clayey soils. The most important findings could be summarized as follows: Generally, in most cases, adding any organic sources i.e., chicken manure (CM) or rabbit manure (RM) or Quail manure (QM) or farmyard manure (FYM) at the rate of 0.5% with50 % RD (NPK) plus inoculated by microbien (Mic.) gave the highest significant values of four cuts and accumulative fresh weight as well as N, P and K percentage of sudan grass grown in clay soil compared with control treatment. As a general view, the fresh weight and N percentage of sudan grass grown in clay soil was increased from 1 st cut to 2 nd one then decreased in 3 rd cut followed by last one using the control treatment or 100% RD (NPK) with or without microbien inoculated or 50% RD (NPK) with CM, QM, RM and FYM with microbien inoculated. The same trend was noticed for P% using the microbien inoculated with 50 % RD (NPK) or 50% RD (NPK) alone or control treatment. Also, the fresh weight of sudan grass was increased from 1st cut to 2nd one followed by 3rd cut then decreased in last one by adding the treatment of 50% RD (NPK) with QM or CM. Similar trend was obtained for N% by adding the 100% RD (NPK) with or without microbien inoculated or 50% RD (NPK) with Mic. The same trend was noticed for P% by adding 50% RD (NPK) plus 0.5% of any organic wastes with or without microbien inoculated. Similar trend was obtained for K% by adding 50% RD (NPK) plus 0.5% of any organic wastes with microbien inoculated compared with control treatment. In general, it could be stated that to increase forage production and its quality of sudan grass, mineral with organic and bio-fertilizer can be used at rate of 50% NPK mineral fertilizers with any organic wastes plus bio- fertilizer (microbien)under the same soil conditions.
苏丹草对有机、无机和生物肥料的响应
这项调查是在2019年夏季生长季节在扎加齐格大学农学院的实验农场进行的。本试验通过连续四次刈割,评价了无机、有机和生物施肥对黏性土壤中苏丹草植株生长和氮磷钾含量的影响。总体而言,在大多数情况下,与对照处理相比,添加任何有机源,即鸡粪(CM)或兔粪(RM)或鹌鹑粪(QM)或农家肥(FYM),以0.5%的比例添加50%的RD (NPK) +微生物(Mic)接种,在粘土中生长的苏丹草的4次割重和累积鲜重以及N, P和K百分比均显著高于对照处理。从总体上看,采用对照处理或100% rd (NPK)接种或不接种微生物,或50% rd (NPK)接种微生物的CM、QM、RM和FYM处理,在粘土土中生长的苏丹草鲜重和N百分比从第一次刈割增加到第二次刈割,第三次刈割后下降,最后一次刈割后下降。用50% RD (NPK)或50% RD (NPK)单独接种或对照处理的微生物组P%也有相同的变化趋势。在第1次刈割至第2次刈割后,第3次刈割后,添加50% RD(氮磷钾)与QM或CM处理后,苏丹草鲜重依次增加,最后一次刈割后鲜重下降。在100% RD (NPK)中添加或不添加微生物菌群,或在50% RD (NPK)中添加Mic,对N%也有类似的变化趋势。添加50% RD (NPK) + 0.5%接种或未接种微生物的有机废物,P%的变化趋势相同。与对照处理相比,添加50% RD (NPK) + 0.5%接种微生物的任何有机废物,K%的变化趋势相似。综上所述,在相同土壤条件下,为提高苏丹草的饲料产量和品质,氮磷钾矿物肥与任何有机废物加生物肥料(微生物)按50%的比例施用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信