EP-422 Operating in the outpatient department: the future of flexor tendon repair?

Anthony C. Rayner, Ahmed Mohamed, M. Mikhail, M. Gardiner
{"title":"EP-422 Operating in the outpatient department: the future of flexor tendon repair?","authors":"Anthony C. Rayner, Ahmed Mohamed, M. Mikhail, M. Gardiner","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac245.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aims Flexor tendon injuries are debilitating with rupture of repair leading to significant morbidity. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to a shift to out-of-theatre operating, with many flexor tendon repairs being performed on the same day as initial assessment in our outpatient department (OPD) procedure room. We aimed to compare the rupture rates before and after the start of the pandemic to assess the safety of this change in practice. Methods Patients who underwent repair of one or more flexor tendons were included from two six-month periods: July to December 2019 and April to September 2020. Patient records were reviewed to identify operation location, number of flexor tendons repaired per patient and rupture incidence. In the second period, patients whose operation was performed in theatre were excluded. Results 28 patients were included for the initial period with a total of 49 flexor tendons injured. All repairs were performed in theatre and 3 ruptures were recorded (6%). 17 patients underwent flexor tendon repair during the second period. 11 patients were operated on in the OPD with a total of 16 flexor tendons injured. 1 rupture was recorded (6%). Conclusions The rupture rate of OPD operating is comparable to that of the traditional theatre pathway. OPD operating also allowed us to circumvent theatre waiting lists and thus avoid costly delays to patient care. This project demonstrates maintained safety for patients and offers a platform for further research to confirm OPD operating as a viable and sustainable alternative for future practice.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of oral surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac245.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Aims Flexor tendon injuries are debilitating with rupture of repair leading to significant morbidity. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to a shift to out-of-theatre operating, with many flexor tendon repairs being performed on the same day as initial assessment in our outpatient department (OPD) procedure room. We aimed to compare the rupture rates before and after the start of the pandemic to assess the safety of this change in practice. Methods Patients who underwent repair of one or more flexor tendons were included from two six-month periods: July to December 2019 and April to September 2020. Patient records were reviewed to identify operation location, number of flexor tendons repaired per patient and rupture incidence. In the second period, patients whose operation was performed in theatre were excluded. Results 28 patients were included for the initial period with a total of 49 flexor tendons injured. All repairs were performed in theatre and 3 ruptures were recorded (6%). 17 patients underwent flexor tendon repair during the second period. 11 patients were operated on in the OPD with a total of 16 flexor tendons injured. 1 rupture was recorded (6%). Conclusions The rupture rate of OPD operating is comparable to that of the traditional theatre pathway. OPD operating also allowed us to circumvent theatre waiting lists and thus avoid costly delays to patient care. This project demonstrates maintained safety for patients and offers a platform for further research to confirm OPD operating as a viable and sustainable alternative for future practice.
门诊手术:屈肌腱修复的未来?
目的屈肌腱损伤是虚弱的,修复断裂导致显著的发病率。SARS-CoV-2大流行导致手术转向院外手术,许多屈肌腱修复是在我们门诊(OPD)手术室进行初步评估的同一天进行的。我们的目的是比较大流行开始前后的破裂率,以评估这种变化在实践中的安全性。方法在2019年7月至12月和2020年4月至9月两个为期六个月的时间段内,对一根或多根屈肌腱进行修复。回顾患者记录以确定手术位置,每位患者修复的屈肌腱数量和断裂发生率。第二阶段排除在手术室进行手术的患者。结果初步纳入28例患者,共损伤49根屈肌腱。所有修复均在手术室进行,记录了3例破裂(6%)。17例患者在第二阶段进行了屈肌腱修复。11例患者在门诊手术,共16屈肌腱受伤。破裂1例(6%)。结论OPD手术的破裂率与传统的手术室路径相当。OPD的操作也使我们避免了手术室等候名单,从而避免了昂贵的病人护理延误。该项目证明了患者的安全性,并为进一步研究提供了平台,以确认OPD手术在未来的实践中是可行和可持续的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信