Lexicographic Analysis of Homonymy in Modern General Dictionaries: The Case Study of Tatar Language

IF 1 Q2 LINGUISTICS
Guzel NurutdinovnaKarimullina, Kamil RakhimovichGaliullin, Marina NikolaevnaPriemysheva, Rezeda NurutdinovnaKarimullina
{"title":"Lexicographic Analysis of Homonymy in Modern General Dictionaries: The Case Study of Tatar Language","authors":"Guzel NurutdinovnaKarimullina, Kamil RakhimovichGaliullin, Marina NikolaevnaPriemysheva, Rezeda NurutdinovnaKarimullina","doi":"10.22055/RALS.2020.16287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current study, it was tried to investigate the features of dictionary description of lexical homonymy using bilingual language reference books of general type, included in the digital corpus of Tatar dictionaries. The type of homonyms and their part-of-speech characteristics are analyzed (with quantitative data).  Comparative analysis revealed the differences in dictionaries related to the interpretation of \"homonym\" notion, characterization of units with similar formatting, an indication of a part of speech, etc. The article presents the materials found in the course of the research, which testify to the mistakes and drawbacks in presentation and description of homonymy (omissions of units, lack of individual labelling of homonymic units or incorrect labelling, discrepancies between interpretation and formatting). Many of these drawbacks are primarily due to the heterogenic description of the units forming a single lexicographic class. The authors substantiate the relevance of a comprehensive approach to registering words with a similar form in dictionaries; under the broader diffusion of written communication, lexicography should treat homonyms as units with identical graphical appearance.","PeriodicalId":44330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2020.16287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the current study, it was tried to investigate the features of dictionary description of lexical homonymy using bilingual language reference books of general type, included in the digital corpus of Tatar dictionaries. The type of homonyms and their part-of-speech characteristics are analyzed (with quantitative data).  Comparative analysis revealed the differences in dictionaries related to the interpretation of "homonym" notion, characterization of units with similar formatting, an indication of a part of speech, etc. The article presents the materials found in the course of the research, which testify to the mistakes and drawbacks in presentation and description of homonymy (omissions of units, lack of individual labelling of homonymic units or incorrect labelling, discrepancies between interpretation and formatting). Many of these drawbacks are primarily due to the heterogenic description of the units forming a single lexicographic class. The authors substantiate the relevance of a comprehensive approach to registering words with a similar form in dictionaries; under the broader diffusion of written communication, lexicography should treat homonyms as units with identical graphical appearance.
现代通用词典中同音异义的词典学分析——以《鞑靼语》为例
本研究试图利用鞑靼语词典数字语料库中的一般类型双语参考书,探讨词典描述词汇同音的特点。用定量数据分析了同音异义词的类型及其词性特征。对比分析揭示了各词典在“同音”概念的解释、格式相近单位的表征、词性表示等方面的差异。本文列举了在研究过程中发现的材料,这些材料证明了同音同义的表述和描述中存在的错误和缺陷(单位遗漏,同音同义单位缺乏单独标注或标注错误,解释和格式不一致)。许多这些缺点主要是由于形成单一词典类的单位的异质描述。作者证实了一种综合方法的相关性,以相似的形式在字典中注册单词;在书面交流广泛传播的情况下,词典编纂应将同音异义词视为具有相同图形外观的单位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The growth of Applied Linguistics as a separate discipline is a success story of the 1950s. The field has developed in many parts of the world and is clearly destined to continue developing well into the twenty-first century. Being concerned with pragmatically motivated study of language in social and cultural settings, Applied Linguistics brings together work in a wide array of fields, including linguistics, literary studies, history, anthropology, psychology, sociology, and economics. The purpose of Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics is to contribute to the development of the field, reflect the breadth of work in Applied Linguistics, and enable readers to share in the exciting new developments that are taking place at the present time. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics (RALs) invites all Iranian and foreign linguists, applied linguists, and teaching practitioners to contribute to the journal by submitting papers under the following main headings: Applied Linguistics Literary Studies Translation Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信