{"title":"Bioequivalence Study Comparing a Generic and Innovator Drug of Rosuvastatin 20 mg","authors":"Dewi Ou","doi":"10.23880/beba-16000189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The bioequivalence study was conducted to compare the bioavailability of two rosuvastatin 20 mg film-coated tablet formulations (test and reference formulation). This study was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-periods, twotreatments, and crossover study which included 32 healthy adult male and female subjects under fasting conditions. Each of the two study periods was separated by a 7 days washout period. A single oral dose of test or reference drug was administered to the subject in each period based on the randomization scheme. Plasma concentrations of the drug were determined by LC-MS/MS method. The pharmacokinetic parameters assessed in this study were the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 72 h (AUC0-72h), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), the peak plasma concentration of the drug (Cmax), time needed to achieve the peak plasma concentration (Tmax), and the elimination half-life (T1/2). The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% Confidence Interval (90% CI) for AUC0-72h and Cmax of test/reference drug for rosuvastatin were 97.05 % (89.07%– 105.74%) and 101.15% (89.53%– 114.26%). Since the 90% CI with α 0.05% for AUC0-72h and Cmax of rosuvastatin were within the standard bioequivalence range (80.00– 125.00%), it was concluded that the two rosuvastatin film-coated tablets (test and reference drug) were bioequivalence in terms of the rate and extent of absorption.","PeriodicalId":8995,"journal":{"name":"Bioequivalence & Bioavailability International Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioequivalence & Bioavailability International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/beba-16000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The bioequivalence study was conducted to compare the bioavailability of two rosuvastatin 20 mg film-coated tablet formulations (test and reference formulation). This study was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-periods, twotreatments, and crossover study which included 32 healthy adult male and female subjects under fasting conditions. Each of the two study periods was separated by a 7 days washout period. A single oral dose of test or reference drug was administered to the subject in each period based on the randomization scheme. Plasma concentrations of the drug were determined by LC-MS/MS method. The pharmacokinetic parameters assessed in this study were the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 72 h (AUC0-72h), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), the peak plasma concentration of the drug (Cmax), time needed to achieve the peak plasma concentration (Tmax), and the elimination half-life (T1/2). The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% Confidence Interval (90% CI) for AUC0-72h and Cmax of test/reference drug for rosuvastatin were 97.05 % (89.07%– 105.74%) and 101.15% (89.53%– 114.26%). Since the 90% CI with α 0.05% for AUC0-72h and Cmax of rosuvastatin were within the standard bioequivalence range (80.00– 125.00%), it was concluded that the two rosuvastatin film-coated tablets (test and reference drug) were bioequivalence in terms of the rate and extent of absorption.