Recurrent Hemorrhage from Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Device Use After the Removal of a Femoral Venous Catheter—A Case Review

Q3 Medicine
M. Fukuda, Masakazu Nabeta, Toshio Morita, O. Takasu
{"title":"Recurrent Hemorrhage from Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Device Use After the Removal of a Femoral Venous Catheter—A Case Review","authors":"M. Fukuda, Masakazu Nabeta, Toshio Morita, O. Takasu","doi":"10.2309/JAVA-D-20-00018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \n \n Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) is an effective method for preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and is comparatively low risk for hemorrhaging compared with anticoagulant therapy. IPC is easily administered, and severe complications are rare. The patient was a 69-year-old male with no underlying diseases related to hemorrhaging of hemostasis. He was hospitalized for treatment of a third-degree burn injury to the upper body. Because the treatment included surgical debridement and skin grafting, there was substantial concern regarding the potential of hemorrhagic complications; hence, IPC was initiated to prevent DVT rather than standard anticoagulant therapy. On the ninth day of hospitalization, a femoral venous catheter initially placed to manage hydration was removed. Manual compression was performed for 15 minutes, and after confirming hemostasis at the insertion site, a hemostasis band was applied for an additional hour. At 90 minutes after confirming hemostasis, there was a secondary hemorrhage at the site of catheter removal. The secondary hemorrhage was stopped with manual compression, and IPC was discontinued. It was concluded that IPC might result in increased blood flow in the femoral vein. This may have contributed to the secondary hemorrhage after the removal of the catheter. Clinicians need to be aware of the fact that IPC may promote secondary hemorrhage after removal of a femoral venous catheter.\n","PeriodicalId":35321,"journal":{"name":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","volume":"23 1","pages":"54-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2309/JAVA-D-20-00018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) is an effective method for preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and is comparatively low risk for hemorrhaging compared with anticoagulant therapy. IPC is easily administered, and severe complications are rare. The patient was a 69-year-old male with no underlying diseases related to hemorrhaging of hemostasis. He was hospitalized for treatment of a third-degree burn injury to the upper body. Because the treatment included surgical debridement and skin grafting, there was substantial concern regarding the potential of hemorrhagic complications; hence, IPC was initiated to prevent DVT rather than standard anticoagulant therapy. On the ninth day of hospitalization, a femoral venous catheter initially placed to manage hydration was removed. Manual compression was performed for 15 minutes, and after confirming hemostasis at the insertion site, a hemostasis band was applied for an additional hour. At 90 minutes after confirming hemostasis, there was a secondary hemorrhage at the site of catheter removal. The secondary hemorrhage was stopped with manual compression, and IPC was discontinued. It was concluded that IPC might result in increased blood flow in the femoral vein. This may have contributed to the secondary hemorrhage after the removal of the catheter. Clinicians need to be aware of the fact that IPC may promote secondary hemorrhage after removal of a femoral venous catheter.
取出股静脉导管后使用间歇气压加压装置引起的复发性出血1例回顾
间歇气动压缩(IPC)是预防深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的有效方法,与抗凝治疗相比,其出血风险较低。IPC易于管理,严重并发症很少见。患者为男性,69岁,无出血或止血相关基础疾病。他被送往医院治疗上半身三级烧伤。由于治疗包括手术清创和植皮,因此对出血并发症的潜在担忧很大;因此,IPC被用于预防深静脉血栓形成,而不是标准的抗凝治疗。在住院第九天,取出最初放置的用于控制水合作用的股静脉导管。手动按压15分钟,确认插入部位止血后,再加止血带1小时。在确认止血90分钟后,拔管部位出现继发性出血。继发性出血通过手压停止,IPC停止。结论IPC可能导致股静脉血流量增加。这可能是拔管后继发性出血的原因。临床医生需要意识到,IPC可能会促进股骨静脉导管取出后的继发性出血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) is an association of healthcare professionals founded in 1985 to promote the emerging vascular access specialty. Today, its multidisciplinary membership advances research, professional and public education to shape practice and enhance patient outcomes, and partners with the device manufacturing community to bring about evidence-based innovations in vascular access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信