Preface and acknowledgements

C. Lefèvre
{"title":"Preface and acknowledgements","authors":"C. Lefèvre","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv25tnx1t.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book is an attempt to channel the energy and ideas of an incredibly diverse set of thinkers into a usable political, intellectual and analytical framework. It was born of a desire to help critical approaches to the world around us – from political economy, urban studies, geography, philosophy, ecological economics and more – to operationalize that criticality without succumbing to the temptation of ideology. It strives to be generally useful but resolutely non-universalistic. While it is written by three academics – an urban planner/ geographer, a political philosopher and an energy geographer – we worked hard to tone down the argumentation in the text. We tried to make it less academic by generally avoiding debates with existing authors. Some may find this frustrating – points of contention are either ignored, or consigned to the footnotes. We could have written an entire chapter defending our preference for ‘vertical approaches’, as opposed to horizontal approaches which focus on capitalism or neoliberalism, a decision that will no doubt anger many traditional political economists. We could have cited so many more people, written twice as many words, and engaged more deeply in debate and discussion, but we did not. There were many reasons behind this decision. Manchester University Press contracted us to write a shorter (and cheaper) book, part of a trend in intellectual publishing that we support. Our goal was to try to articulate a set of ideas, not to","PeriodicalId":86994,"journal":{"name":"Paris medical","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paris medical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv25tnx1t.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This book is an attempt to channel the energy and ideas of an incredibly diverse set of thinkers into a usable political, intellectual and analytical framework. It was born of a desire to help critical approaches to the world around us – from political economy, urban studies, geography, philosophy, ecological economics and more – to operationalize that criticality without succumbing to the temptation of ideology. It strives to be generally useful but resolutely non-universalistic. While it is written by three academics – an urban planner/ geographer, a political philosopher and an energy geographer – we worked hard to tone down the argumentation in the text. We tried to make it less academic by generally avoiding debates with existing authors. Some may find this frustrating – points of contention are either ignored, or consigned to the footnotes. We could have written an entire chapter defending our preference for ‘vertical approaches’, as opposed to horizontal approaches which focus on capitalism or neoliberalism, a decision that will no doubt anger many traditional political economists. We could have cited so many more people, written twice as many words, and engaged more deeply in debate and discussion, but we did not. There were many reasons behind this decision. Manchester University Press contracted us to write a shorter (and cheaper) book, part of a trend in intellectual publishing that we support. Our goal was to try to articulate a set of ideas, not to
前言及致谢
这本书试图将各种各样的思想家的精力和思想整合到一个可用的政治、知识和分析框架中。它诞生于一种愿望,即帮助我们周围世界的批判性方法——从政治经济学、城市研究、地理学、哲学、生态经济学等等——在不屈服于意识形态诱惑的情况下,将这种批判性付诸实施。它力求普遍有用,但坚决非普遍主义。虽然它是由三位学者——一位城市规划师/地理学家、一位政治哲学家和一位能源地理学家——撰写的,但我们努力淡化文本中的争论。我们试图通过避免与现有作者的争论来减少学术性。有些人可能会对此感到沮丧——争论点要么被忽略,要么被束之高招。我们本可以写一整章来捍卫我们对“垂直方法”的偏好,而不是关注资本主义或新自由主义的水平方法,这一决定无疑会激怒许多传统的政治经济学家。我们本可以引用更多的人的话,写两倍的文章,更深入地参与辩论和讨论,但我们没有。这一决定背后有很多原因。曼彻斯特大学出版社(Manchester University Press)与我们签约,让我们写一本篇幅更短(也更便宜)的书,这是我们支持的智力出版趋势的一部分。我们的目标是努力阐明一套想法,而不是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信