Analysis of a terminological base in the field of two-dimensional seismic surveying and proposals on its development and unification

V. Romanov
{"title":"Analysis of a terminological base in the field of two-dimensional seismic surveying and proposals on its development and unification","authors":"V. Romanov","doi":"10.32454/0016-7762-2022-64-1-61-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The state of the terminological base used in the field of two-dimensional seismic surveying in the period 1933–2015 is analyzed and proposals to revise some key concepts are made.Aim. An analysis of the existing terminological base of the procedure of two-dimensional seismic surveying and the formation of a new base on the basis of a system approach.Materials and methods. An analysis of the terms used in educational, reference and normative literature on seismic surveying published in 1933–2015, followed by a critical analysis of the revealed terminological bases.Results. The investigated interval was divided into three stages on the basis of the state of terminology applied in seismic surveying. The first stage covered the period from 1933 to 1959, when the fundamental concepts of seismic surveying technology were passing the stage of formation. The quantity of terms at that time was small, many of them were characterised by unwieldiness or uncertainty of the described concept. In the period 1960–1992, the forming terminological base was presented in a state standard. The third stage was characterized by a slow pace of terminology development, when a number of publications showed a return to outdated or unsuccessful terms. The author identified the most stable terms, their unified names and definitions, and provided recommendations for their use. The following definitions of key concepts were proposed for revision: placement removal (distance), taking into account the variety of observation systems used in 2D seismic surveying; new terms inherited from the practice of 3D seismic surveying and group theory, including receiving line, placement removal, template, template step, order. A classification of templates was considered.Conclusion. The state of the terminological base in the field of two-dimensional seismic surveying, including its shortcomings and problems, was analyzed. It is proposed to improve the current terminological base by adding new terms and revising the existing definitions.","PeriodicalId":33343,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii Geologiia i razvedka","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii Geologiia i razvedka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2022-64-1-61-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The state of the terminological base used in the field of two-dimensional seismic surveying in the period 1933–2015 is analyzed and proposals to revise some key concepts are made.Aim. An analysis of the existing terminological base of the procedure of two-dimensional seismic surveying and the formation of a new base on the basis of a system approach.Materials and methods. An analysis of the terms used in educational, reference and normative literature on seismic surveying published in 1933–2015, followed by a critical analysis of the revealed terminological bases.Results. The investigated interval was divided into three stages on the basis of the state of terminology applied in seismic surveying. The first stage covered the period from 1933 to 1959, when the fundamental concepts of seismic surveying technology were passing the stage of formation. The quantity of terms at that time was small, many of them were characterised by unwieldiness or uncertainty of the described concept. In the period 1960–1992, the forming terminological base was presented in a state standard. The third stage was characterized by a slow pace of terminology development, when a number of publications showed a return to outdated or unsuccessful terms. The author identified the most stable terms, their unified names and definitions, and provided recommendations for their use. The following definitions of key concepts were proposed for revision: placement removal (distance), taking into account the variety of observation systems used in 2D seismic surveying; new terms inherited from the practice of 3D seismic surveying and group theory, including receiving line, placement removal, template, template step, order. A classification of templates was considered.Conclusion. The state of the terminological base in the field of two-dimensional seismic surveying, including its shortcomings and problems, was analyzed. It is proposed to improve the current terminological base by adding new terms and revising the existing definitions.
二维地震测量领域术语库的分析及发展统一的建议
介绍。分析了1933-2015年二维地震测量领域术语库的使用情况,并对一些关键概念提出了修改建议。分析了二维地震测量程序的现有术语库,并在系统方法的基础上建立了新的术语库。材料和方法。分析了1933-2015年出版的地震测量教育、参考和规范文献中使用的术语,然后对揭示的术语基础进行了批判性分析。根据地震测量术语的使用情况,将调查区间分为三个阶段。第一阶段为1933年至1959年,地震测量技术的基本概念正处于形成阶段。当时术语的数量很少,其中许多术语的特点是描述概念的笨拙或不确定。在1960-1992年期间,形成的术语库在国家标准中提出。第三阶段的特点是术语发展速度缓慢,当时一些出版物显示回到过时或不成功的术语。作者确定了最稳定的术语,它们的统一名称和定义,并提供了使用它们的建议。建议修订以下关键概念的定义:考虑到二维地震测量中使用的观测系统的多样性,放置移除(距离);继承了三维地震测量实践和群理论的新术语,包括接收线、放置移除、模板、模板步进、顺序。考虑了模板的分类。分析了二维地震测量领域术语库的现状,包括存在的不足和问题。建议通过增加新术语和修订现有定义来完善现有术语库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信