Service delivery methods for adolescent language intervention in Australia: a scoping review

IF 1 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
K. Utley, Suzanne C. Hopf
{"title":"Service delivery methods for adolescent language intervention in Australia: a scoping review","authors":"K. Utley, Suzanne C. Hopf","doi":"10.1080/2050571X.2021.1879612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Provision of language support for Australian adolescents with communication and learning needs is supported by Speech Pathology Australia (SPA) and the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). This literature review aims to describe the settings in which an adolescent may interact with speech and language pathology (SLP) services and the service delivery methods engaged for language intervention. Method A comprehensive and systematized database search was conducted. Extracted literature was measured against recognized quality, validity, and applicability standards then thematically analysed and critiqued. Results Australian research regarding service delivery settings and intervention methods for adolescents is scant. Prevalence rates were found to vary significantly across settings; however, available current data is limited and discrepancies within settings were found to be influenced by a range of factors. Available data demonstrated that Australian adolescents presently receive language intervention within secondary schools, health-based services, private practice, and juvenile justice. Service delivery methods used in these settings included one-on-one, pull-out methods, collaborative and consultative methods, and response to intervention. Conclusion High prevalence rates in juvenile justice and flexible learning programmes suggest significant need for language intervention which in turn may reflect the need for additional language support in secondary school settings to address the school-to-prison pipeline. Factors that influence SLPs’ decisions for service delivery methods are largely unknown from available Australian literature. Further research across all settings is critical to guide best practice principles for SLP service delivery decisions for this age group.","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":"44 1","pages":"67 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Language and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2021.1879612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Provision of language support for Australian adolescents with communication and learning needs is supported by Speech Pathology Australia (SPA) and the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). This literature review aims to describe the settings in which an adolescent may interact with speech and language pathology (SLP) services and the service delivery methods engaged for language intervention. Method A comprehensive and systematized database search was conducted. Extracted literature was measured against recognized quality, validity, and applicability standards then thematically analysed and critiqued. Results Australian research regarding service delivery settings and intervention methods for adolescents is scant. Prevalence rates were found to vary significantly across settings; however, available current data is limited and discrepancies within settings were found to be influenced by a range of factors. Available data demonstrated that Australian adolescents presently receive language intervention within secondary schools, health-based services, private practice, and juvenile justice. Service delivery methods used in these settings included one-on-one, pull-out methods, collaborative and consultative methods, and response to intervention. Conclusion High prevalence rates in juvenile justice and flexible learning programmes suggest significant need for language intervention which in turn may reflect the need for additional language support in secondary school settings to address the school-to-prison pipeline. Factors that influence SLPs’ decisions for service delivery methods are largely unknown from available Australian literature. Further research across all settings is critical to guide best practice principles for SLP service delivery decisions for this age group.
澳大利亚青少年语言干预的服务提供方法:范围审查
背景:澳大利亚语言病理学协会(SPA)和澳大利亚课程、评估和报告管理局(ACARA)支持为有交流和学习需求的澳大利亚青少年提供语言支持。这篇文献综述的目的是描述青少年可能与言语和语言病理学(SLP)服务互动的环境,以及语言干预的服务提供方法。方法进行全面、系统的数据库检索。根据公认的质量、有效性和适用性标准对提取的文献进行测量,然后进行主题分析和批评。结果澳大利亚关于青少年服务提供设置和干预方法的研究很少。发现不同环境的患病率差异很大;然而,现有的数据有限,并且发现设置内的差异受到一系列因素的影响。现有数据表明,澳大利亚青少年目前在中学、保健服务、私人诊所和少年司法机构接受语言干预。在这些环境中使用的服务提供方法包括一对一、退出方法、协作和咨询方法以及对干预的响应。结论:青少年司法的高患病率和灵活的学习计划表明语言干预的重要性,这反过来可能反映了中学环境中需要额外的语言支持,以解决从学校到监狱的管道问题。影响slp决定服务提供方法的因素在很大程度上是未知的,从现有的澳大利亚文献。在所有环境下进行进一步的研究对于指导针对这一年龄组的SLP服务提供决策的最佳实践原则至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Speech Language and Hearing
Speech Language and Hearing AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信