Diálogo entre reconocimiento y desarrollo

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY
Carolina Godoy-Berthet, Mauricio Alarcón-Silva
{"title":"Diálogo entre reconocimiento y desarrollo","authors":"Carolina Godoy-Berthet, Mauricio Alarcón-Silva","doi":"10.4067/s0717-554x2020000100026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl presente articulo se propone establecer un dialogo entre las nociones de desarrollo y de reconocimiento. La fundamentacion epistemica de esta discusion se enmarca en la consideracion de Ricoeur que apuesta a la condicion del individuo como un hombre capaz o “un yo puedo”, con el poder de hablar, actuar e imputarse acciones, condiciones basicas para enfrentar el camino hacia el reconocimiento de si mismo. Ahora bien, dichas capacidades individuales de obrar, en el plano colectivo se extienden hacia practicas sociales de reconocimiento mutuo sustentadas bajo un principio etico, desde el cual, es posible identificar tres imperativos dialogantes con la nocion de desarrollo: tender hacia la vida buena, en y con el otro y con instituciones justas. Se concluye afirmando que la crisis respecto de la nocion de desarrollo propia de la modernidad ha dado a la misma la posibilidad de resignificar los enfoques que exaltan las capacidades humanas en la busqueda de un bienestar subjetivo que se orienten hacia el camino del reconocimiento mutuo. EnglishThis article aims to establish a dialogue between notions of development and recognition. The epistemic foundation of this discussion is framed in Ricoeur consideration that bets on the individual's condition as a capable man or \"I can\", with the power to speak, act and impute actions, basic conditions to face the path to recognition of himself. However, these individual capacities to act, on the collective level, extend to social practices of mutual recognition based on an ethical principle, from which, it is possible to identify three imperatives dialoguing with the notion of development: to tend towards the good life, in and with others, and with just institutions. It concludes by affirming that the crisis regarding the notion of development proper to modernity has given it the possibility of resignifying the approaches that exalt human capacities in the search for subjective well-being that are oriented towards the path of mutual recognition.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":"19 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cinta de Moebio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2020000100026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

espanolEl presente articulo se propone establecer un dialogo entre las nociones de desarrollo y de reconocimiento. La fundamentacion epistemica de esta discusion se enmarca en la consideracion de Ricoeur que apuesta a la condicion del individuo como un hombre capaz o “un yo puedo”, con el poder de hablar, actuar e imputarse acciones, condiciones basicas para enfrentar el camino hacia el reconocimiento de si mismo. Ahora bien, dichas capacidades individuales de obrar, en el plano colectivo se extienden hacia practicas sociales de reconocimiento mutuo sustentadas bajo un principio etico, desde el cual, es posible identificar tres imperativos dialogantes con la nocion de desarrollo: tender hacia la vida buena, en y con el otro y con instituciones justas. Se concluye afirmando que la crisis respecto de la nocion de desarrollo propia de la modernidad ha dado a la misma la posibilidad de resignificar los enfoques que exaltan las capacidades humanas en la busqueda de un bienestar subjetivo que se orienten hacia el camino del reconocimiento mutuo. EnglishThis article aims to establish a dialogue between notions of development and recognition. The epistemic foundation of this discussion is framed in Ricoeur consideration that bets on the individual's condition as a capable man or "I can", with the power to speak, act and impute actions, basic conditions to face the path to recognition of himself. However, these individual capacities to act, on the collective level, extend to social practices of mutual recognition based on an ethical principle, from which, it is possible to identify three imperatives dialoguing with the notion of development: to tend towards the good life, in and with others, and with just institutions. It concludes by affirming that the crisis regarding the notion of development proper to modernity has given it the possibility of resignifying the approaches that exalt human capacities in the search for subjective well-being that are oriented towards the path of mutual recognition.
承认与发展之间的对话
本文旨在建立发展和认可概念之间的对话。的fundamentacion epistemica这样的讨论的恰当的考虑押注于一个人条件的个人能力或“我可以”,权力不再说话,和处罚动作,基本条件采取行动,应对道路识别你自己。然而,这些集体行动的个人能力,延伸到社会实践的相互承认不道德的原则下,从那里,可以确定三个dialogantes必要性与发展:绳nocion走向生活的好,和其他的和公正的机构。本文的结论是,关于现代性自身发展的危害的危机使它有可能重新定义提高人类在寻求主观福祉时的能力的方法,这些方法趋向于相互承认的道路。本文旨在建立发展概念与承认概念之间的对话。这一讨论的认识论基础是建立在这样一种考虑之上的,即把个人的状况作为一个有能力的人或“我可以”,拥有说话、行动和归因行动的权力,这是面对自我认识之路的基本条件。然而,这些单独的能力to act on the collective层面,扩展社会practices of相互承认based on an伦理原则,from which it单人床确定三imperatives dialoguing with the notion of development: to tend towards the good life in and with others and with just课程。它的结论是,关于有利于现代化的发展概念的危机使它有可能重新定义在寻求主观福祉的过程中提高人类能力的方法,这种方法面向相互承认的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cinta de Moebio
Cinta de Moebio PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Cinta de Moebio publishes scientific articles and essays on epistemology of social science. The editorial experience of the magazine indicates that some academics send articles of philosophy, but of issues that are not related to the social sciences, as well as academics who sent the results of their research or projects in the social sciences, but its focus is not epistemology, which also are geared out to the purpose of the journal. The journal, put it in some way, it is in the dialogue of philosophy with social science and, therefore, both domains must be present in the articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信