Lacunar Stroke Is the Major Cause of Progressive Motor Deficits

W. Steinke, S. Ley
{"title":"Lacunar Stroke Is the Major Cause of Progressive Motor Deficits","authors":"W. Steinke, S. Ley","doi":"10.1161/01.STR.0000016326.78014.FE","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose— Severe motor deficits are the predominant cause of long-term disability in stroke patients. In particular, progressive hemiparesis in the initial stage after stroke onset is frequently devastating. Therefore, we attempted to define the population at risk with respect to the presumed pathogenesis. Methods— Among 941 stroke patients hospitalized during a 3-year period, 92 patients (41 men, 51 women; mean age, 68 years) had a severe motor deficit (<25 of 42 points on the 7 motor items of the European Stroke Scale) resulting from brain infarcts. Risk factors, neurological examinations, comprehensive diagnostic tests, and therapy were documented. The study population was separated into patients with (group A) and without (group B) progressive motor deficits. Progression was defined as a further decrease of at least 5 points on the initial European Stroke Scale motor score during the first 5 days after stroke onset. Results— Of the 92 patients, 23.9% had significant worsening of motor function with a decrease in the mean European Stroke Scale motor score from 20.3 to 12.9 points (P <0.01). Infarcts in group A patients were subcortical in 59.1%, whereas most infarcts were cortical in group B (61.4%, P <0.05). Progressive hemiparesis was also significantly associated with lacunar stroke (group A:, 59.1%; group B, 24.3%;P <0.01). With regard to risk factors, diagnostic studies, and neuroimaging, small-vessel disease was the predominant presumed cause of stroke in group A (63.6%, P <0.01), whereas infarcts in group B patients were frequently caused by embolism from cardiac or undetermined sources (61.4%, P <0.01). Prevalence of high-grade carotid stenosis was not significantly different between groups A and B; however, subtotal stenoses and complete internal carotid artery occlusions were found only among patients without progressive motor deficits. Conclusions— Lacunar stroke caused by small-vessel disease is the major cause of progressive motor deficits, probably because of stepwise occlusion of the branches of small penetrating arteries.","PeriodicalId":22274,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"28 10 1","pages":"1510-1516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"153","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000016326.78014.FE","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 153

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Severe motor deficits are the predominant cause of long-term disability in stroke patients. In particular, progressive hemiparesis in the initial stage after stroke onset is frequently devastating. Therefore, we attempted to define the population at risk with respect to the presumed pathogenesis. Methods— Among 941 stroke patients hospitalized during a 3-year period, 92 patients (41 men, 51 women; mean age, 68 years) had a severe motor deficit (<25 of 42 points on the 7 motor items of the European Stroke Scale) resulting from brain infarcts. Risk factors, neurological examinations, comprehensive diagnostic tests, and therapy were documented. The study population was separated into patients with (group A) and without (group B) progressive motor deficits. Progression was defined as a further decrease of at least 5 points on the initial European Stroke Scale motor score during the first 5 days after stroke onset. Results— Of the 92 patients, 23.9% had significant worsening of motor function with a decrease in the mean European Stroke Scale motor score from 20.3 to 12.9 points (P <0.01). Infarcts in group A patients were subcortical in 59.1%, whereas most infarcts were cortical in group B (61.4%, P <0.05). Progressive hemiparesis was also significantly associated with lacunar stroke (group A:, 59.1%; group B, 24.3%;P <0.01). With regard to risk factors, diagnostic studies, and neuroimaging, small-vessel disease was the predominant presumed cause of stroke in group A (63.6%, P <0.01), whereas infarcts in group B patients were frequently caused by embolism from cardiac or undetermined sources (61.4%, P <0.01). Prevalence of high-grade carotid stenosis was not significantly different between groups A and B; however, subtotal stenoses and complete internal carotid artery occlusions were found only among patients without progressive motor deficits. Conclusions— Lacunar stroke caused by small-vessel disease is the major cause of progressive motor deficits, probably because of stepwise occlusion of the branches of small penetrating arteries.
腔隙性中风是进行性运动障碍的主要原因
背景和目的——严重的运动障碍是脑卒中患者长期残疾的主要原因。特别是,中风发作后初期的进行性偏瘫往往是毁灭性的。因此,我们试图根据假定的发病机制来确定高危人群。方法:在3年内住院的941例脑卒中患者中,92例患者(男性41例,女性51例;平均年龄68岁)有严重的运动缺陷(在欧洲卒中量表的7项运动项目中42分中<25分)导致脑梗死。记录危险因素、神经学检查、综合诊断测试和治疗。研究人群分为有(A组)和无(B组)进行性运动缺陷的患者。进展被定义为在卒中发作后的前5天内,欧洲卒中量表初始运动评分进一步下降至少5分。结果:在92例患者中,23.9%的患者运动功能明显恶化,欧洲卒中量表运动评分从20.3分下降到12.9分(P <0.01)。A组以皮质下梗死为主(59.1%),B组以皮质梗死为主(61.4%,P <0.05)。进行性偏瘫也与腔隙性脑卒中显著相关(A组:,59.1%;B组为24.3%;P <0.01)。在危险因素、诊断研究和神经影像学方面,小血管疾病是A组中风的主要推定原因(63.6%,P <0.01),而B组患者的梗死通常是由心脏栓塞或不明原因引起的(61.4%,P <0.01)。A组和B组颈动脉高度狭窄发生率无显著差异;然而,仅在没有进行性运动障碍的患者中发现了次全狭窄和完全颈内动脉闭塞。结论:小血管疾病引起的腔隙性卒中是进行性运动障碍的主要原因,可能是因为小穿透动脉分支的逐步闭塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信