Increase liquid oil production by huff-n-puff of produced gas in shale gas condensate reservoirs

James J. Sheng
{"title":"Increase liquid oil production by huff-n-puff of produced gas in shale gas condensate reservoirs","authors":"James J. Sheng","doi":"10.1016/j.juogr.2015.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Huge shale resources available and low gas price turn the oil operators’ activities to producing more liquid oil. The earlier studies from our research group and others show that huff-n-puff has the highest potential to improve oil recovery (IOR) in shale oil reservoirs, compared with common IOR methods of gas flooding and waterflooding. This paper is to extend the research to shale gas condensate reservoirs to evaluate the IOR potential. The simulation analysis approach is used.</p><p><span><span>The simulation results and discussions in this paper show that huff-n-puff injection of produced gases can produce more liquid oil in gas condensate reservoirs than gas flooding or primary depletion. This result is verified by all the simulated cases with different reservoir and fluid properties and operation conditions. The advantages of huff-n-puff over gas flooding are the early response to gas injection, high drawdown pressure, oil saturation decrease near the </span>wellbore by evaporation, and overcoming the pressure transport problem owing to ultra-low permeability. The advantages become more important when the </span>initial reservoir pressure<span> is close to the dew point pressure, or the bottom-hole flowing pressure is low. The effects of injected gas composition, cycle time and soak time during the huff-n-puff process are investigated. A simple economic analysis is also conducted.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.juogr.2015.04.004","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221339761500021X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

Huge shale resources available and low gas price turn the oil operators’ activities to producing more liquid oil. The earlier studies from our research group and others show that huff-n-puff has the highest potential to improve oil recovery (IOR) in shale oil reservoirs, compared with common IOR methods of gas flooding and waterflooding. This paper is to extend the research to shale gas condensate reservoirs to evaluate the IOR potential. The simulation analysis approach is used.

The simulation results and discussions in this paper show that huff-n-puff injection of produced gases can produce more liquid oil in gas condensate reservoirs than gas flooding or primary depletion. This result is verified by all the simulated cases with different reservoir and fluid properties and operation conditions. The advantages of huff-n-puff over gas flooding are the early response to gas injection, high drawdown pressure, oil saturation decrease near the wellbore by evaporation, and overcoming the pressure transport problem owing to ultra-low permeability. The advantages become more important when the initial reservoir pressure is close to the dew point pressure, or the bottom-hole flowing pressure is low. The effects of injected gas composition, cycle time and soak time during the huff-n-puff process are investigated. A simple economic analysis is also conducted.

通过对页岩凝析气藏采出气的吞吐,提高液态油产量
巨大的页岩资源和低廉的天然气价格使石油运营商的活动转向生产更多的液体油。我们的研究小组和其他人的早期研究表明,与气驱和水驱等常见的IOR方法相比,吞吐法在提高页岩油藏原油采收率(IOR)方面具有最大的潜力。本文将该研究扩展到页岩凝析气藏,以评价其IOR潜力。采用仿真分析方法。模拟结果和本文的讨论表明,在凝析气藏中,吞吐注采出气比气驱或一次衰竭采出更多的液态油。通过不同储层、流体性质和操作条件的模拟实例验证了这一结果。与气驱相比,吞吐技术的优势在于对注气反应早、压降高、蒸发导致井筒附近含油饱和度降低、克服了超低渗透带来的压力传递问题。当储层初始压力接近露点压力或井底流动压力较低时,这种优势更加明显。研究了注入气体成分、循环时间和浸泡时间对充气过程的影响。并进行了简单的经济分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信