Target benefit versus defined contribution scheme: a multi-period framework

IF 1.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
ASTIN Bulletin Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1017/asb.2023.27
Ping Chen, Haixiang Yao, Hailiang Yang, Dan Zhu
{"title":"Target benefit versus defined contribution scheme: a multi-period framework","authors":"Ping Chen, Haixiang Yao, Hailiang Yang, Dan Zhu","doi":"10.1017/asb.2023.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A target benefit plan (TBP) is a collective defined contribution (DC) plan that is growing in popularity in Canada. Similar to DC plans, TBPs have fixed contribution rates, but they also implement pooling of longevity and investment risk. In this paper, we formulate a multi-period model that incorporates two sources of risk – asset risk and labor income risk for active members. We present an optimal investment and retirement benefits schedule for TBP members with a fixed contribution rate. Using Australian data from 1965 to 2018, we evaluate the performance of the optimal TBP scheme and compare it to the optimal DC scheme. By adopting the benefit–investment strategy derived in this paper, we demonstrate the stability of benefit distribution over time for a TBP scheme in this stochastic formulation. To outperform the DC scheme’s benefit payment, careful consideration shall be given to the benefit target in the TBP scheme. A high target may not be achievable, while a low target can impede the accumulation momentum of the fund’s wealth in its early stages. Moreover, a TBP fund’s investment strategy is primarily influenced by the wealth target, with more aggressive investments in risky assets as the wealth target increases. This analysis may shed light on the possible improvements to retirement planning in Australia. Although the results are sensitive to the choice of model parameters, overall, the proposed TBP promotes system stability in various scenarios.","PeriodicalId":8617,"journal":{"name":"ASTIN Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASTIN Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2023.27","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract A target benefit plan (TBP) is a collective defined contribution (DC) plan that is growing in popularity in Canada. Similar to DC plans, TBPs have fixed contribution rates, but they also implement pooling of longevity and investment risk. In this paper, we formulate a multi-period model that incorporates two sources of risk – asset risk and labor income risk for active members. We present an optimal investment and retirement benefits schedule for TBP members with a fixed contribution rate. Using Australian data from 1965 to 2018, we evaluate the performance of the optimal TBP scheme and compare it to the optimal DC scheme. By adopting the benefit–investment strategy derived in this paper, we demonstrate the stability of benefit distribution over time for a TBP scheme in this stochastic formulation. To outperform the DC scheme’s benefit payment, careful consideration shall be given to the benefit target in the TBP scheme. A high target may not be achievable, while a low target can impede the accumulation momentum of the fund’s wealth in its early stages. Moreover, a TBP fund’s investment strategy is primarily influenced by the wealth target, with more aggressive investments in risky assets as the wealth target increases. This analysis may shed light on the possible improvements to retirement planning in Australia. Although the results are sensitive to the choice of model parameters, overall, the proposed TBP promotes system stability in various scenarios.
目标福利与设定供款计划:多期框架
目标收益计划(TBP)是一种在加拿大越来越受欢迎的集体设定缴款(DC)计划。与固定缴款计划类似,tbp有固定的缴款率,但它们也实现了寿命和投资风险的汇集。在本文中,我们建立了一个包含两个风险来源的多时期模型——资产风险和劳动收入风险。我们为TBP成员提供了一个固定供款率的最佳投资和退休福利计划。利用1965年至2018年的澳大利亚数据,我们评估了最优TBP方案的性能,并将其与最优DC方案进行了比较。通过采用本文导出的收益-投资策略,我们证明了该随机公式中TBP方案的收益分配随时间的稳定性。为了超越DC计划的福利支付,应仔细考虑TBP计划中的福利目标。较高的目标可能无法实现,而较低的目标可能会阻碍基金财富在早期阶段的积累势头。此外,TBP基金的投资策略主要受财富目标的影响,随着财富目标的增加,其对风险资产的投资更加激进。这一分析可能有助于改善澳大利亚的退休计划。虽然结果对模型参数的选择比较敏感,但总的来说,提出的TBP提高了系统在各种场景下的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASTIN Bulletin
ASTIN Bulletin 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ASTIN Bulletin publishes papers that are relevant to any branch of actuarial science and insurance mathematics. Its papers are quantitative and scientific in nature, and draw on theory and methods developed in any branch of the mathematical sciences including actuarial mathematics, statistics, probability, financial mathematics and econometrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信