Dimensional Accuracy of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials Considering Impression Techniques– A Literature Review

Nadia Nouri, P. Amini, R. Amini, Mohammad Mousavi, Sajad Raeisi Estabragh, Abdola Ebrahimi
{"title":"Dimensional Accuracy of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials Considering Impression Techniques– A Literature Review","authors":"Nadia Nouri, P. Amini, R. Amini, Mohammad Mousavi, Sajad Raeisi Estabragh, Abdola Ebrahimi","doi":"10.22037/JDS.V37I1.27171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Impression accuracy is the main determinant of the fit, form and function of prosthetic restorations. Polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) is the material of choice in most clinical situations. The purpose of this paper is to provide an up-to-date review of scientific articles which discuss the dimensional accuracy of PVS impression material using various impression techniques, tray types and spacers. Besides, the procedure, advantages and disadvantages of commonly used impression techniques, technique modifications and innovations are also reviewed. Method An electronic search of scientific papers from 1990 to 2018 was carried out using MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases using the search terms “accuracy and polyvinyl siloxane and impression technique” and “accuracy and addition silicone and impression technique”. Results Searching the key words yielded a total of 312 articles. By application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the obtained results were further reduced to 35 citations. Conclusion Impression technique is a critical variable in the accuracy of PVS impressions. Dual-phase 2-step technique with 1 to 2 mm space for the light body is proven to be highly accurate and is still considered as the standard technique. The use of 2-step technique without providing a space for the wash material is rejected by the literature. Triple-phase 2-step techniques including “matrix impression system” have also functioned well and even superior to traditional dual-phase 2-step technique. Papers suggest that custom trays do not significantly improve the accuracy of impressions and rigid stock trays are suitable alternatives","PeriodicalId":21563,"journal":{"name":"Shahid Beheshti University Dental Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"32-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shahid Beheshti University Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/JDS.V37I1.27171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives Impression accuracy is the main determinant of the fit, form and function of prosthetic restorations. Polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) is the material of choice in most clinical situations. The purpose of this paper is to provide an up-to-date review of scientific articles which discuss the dimensional accuracy of PVS impression material using various impression techniques, tray types and spacers. Besides, the procedure, advantages and disadvantages of commonly used impression techniques, technique modifications and innovations are also reviewed. Method An electronic search of scientific papers from 1990 to 2018 was carried out using MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases using the search terms “accuracy and polyvinyl siloxane and impression technique” and “accuracy and addition silicone and impression technique”. Results Searching the key words yielded a total of 312 articles. By application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the obtained results were further reduced to 35 citations. Conclusion Impression technique is a critical variable in the accuracy of PVS impressions. Dual-phase 2-step technique with 1 to 2 mm space for the light body is proven to be highly accurate and is still considered as the standard technique. The use of 2-step technique without providing a space for the wash material is rejected by the literature. Triple-phase 2-step techniques including “matrix impression system” have also functioned well and even superior to traditional dual-phase 2-step technique. Papers suggest that custom trays do not significantly improve the accuracy of impressions and rigid stock trays are suitable alternatives
考虑压模技术的聚乙烯醇硅氧烷压模材料尺寸精度的文献综述
目的印模精度是决定义肢修复体配合、形态和功能的主要因素。在大多数临床情况下,聚乙烯醇硅氧烷(PVS)是首选材料。本文的目的是提供最新的科学文章,讨论的尺寸精度的pv压印材料使用各种压印技术,托盘类型和垫片。此外,还对常用压印技术的步骤、优缺点、技术改进和创新进行了综述。方法在MEDLINE和Google Scholar数据库中检索1990 - 2018年的科技论文,检索词为“准确性与聚硅氧烷及印模技术”和“准确性与加硅氧烷及印模技术”。结果通过关键词检索得到312篇论文。通过应用纳入和排除标准,得到的结果进一步减少到35次引用。结论压印技术是影响PVS压印精度的关键因素。双相两步技术,光体空间为1 ~ 2mm,被证明是高精度的,仍然被认为是标准技术。使用两步技术而不为洗涤材料提供空间被文献拒绝。包括“基质印象系统”在内的三相两步技术也表现良好,甚至优于传统的双相两步技术。论文建议,定制托盘不显着提高精度的印象和刚性库存托盘是合适的替代品
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信