"The second sex" of pain and laughter: Painful giggling transressions of gender divide

Mirjana Stošić
{"title":"\"The second sex\" of pain and laughter: Painful giggling transressions of gender divide","authors":"Mirjana Stošić","doi":"10.5937/kultura2171074s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By the mid-20th century, Simone de Beauvoir has published an important and ground-breaking research into the facts, myths and living experience of \"the second sex\" (Le Deuxième Sexe, 1949). Drawing on contemporary theories based on phenomenology and existentialism, de Beauvoir argues that the \"man\" is a historical idea, and the woman as a \"becoming\". At the end of the 20th century pain studies have gained vast attention in political theory, especially in political effect theory and \"new materialism\". Numerous studies have neglected de Beauvoir's frequent arguments dealing with \"women's pain\" and women's agency in human mitsein, particularly regarding the woman's embeddedness in social myths that \"feminise\" the body of a woman, as a form of crisis and resistance to be subjected to species and reproduction. This paper deals with the crisis and critique of physiological, economic, psychological and social disposability of female bodies. In addition, this research re-questions the limits of physical, semiological, cultural and political dissemination of (female) laughter, seen through the lens of interruptions and destabilizations of the hegemonic gender discourse incarcerated within the gender divide. Consequently, we are to open up a space for interrogating the \"irony of giggle\" as a form of resistance to the contemporary body politics - as a non-place, devoid of any political agency.","PeriodicalId":53322,"journal":{"name":"Kultura Skopje","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kultura Skopje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura2171074s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By the mid-20th century, Simone de Beauvoir has published an important and ground-breaking research into the facts, myths and living experience of "the second sex" (Le Deuxième Sexe, 1949). Drawing on contemporary theories based on phenomenology and existentialism, de Beauvoir argues that the "man" is a historical idea, and the woman as a "becoming". At the end of the 20th century pain studies have gained vast attention in political theory, especially in political effect theory and "new materialism". Numerous studies have neglected de Beauvoir's frequent arguments dealing with "women's pain" and women's agency in human mitsein, particularly regarding the woman's embeddedness in social myths that "feminise" the body of a woman, as a form of crisis and resistance to be subjected to species and reproduction. This paper deals with the crisis and critique of physiological, economic, psychological and social disposability of female bodies. In addition, this research re-questions the limits of physical, semiological, cultural and political dissemination of (female) laughter, seen through the lens of interruptions and destabilizations of the hegemonic gender discourse incarcerated within the gender divide. Consequently, we are to open up a space for interrogating the "irony of giggle" as a form of resistance to the contemporary body politics - as a non-place, devoid of any political agency.
痛苦与欢笑的“第二性”:痛苦的咯咯笑对性别鸿沟的越界
到20世纪中期,西蒙娜·德·波伏娃发表了一篇重要的、开创性的关于“第二性”的事实、神话和生活经验的研究(Le deuxi sexme, 1949)。波伏娃借鉴现象学和存在主义的当代理论,认为“男人”是一个历史概念,而女人是一个“成为”。20世纪末,疼痛研究在政治理论界,特别是在政治效应理论和“新唯物主义”中受到了广泛关注。许多研究都忽略了波伏娃关于“女性的痛苦”和女性在人类进化中的作用的频繁争论,特别是关于女性在社会神话中的嵌入性,即女性身体的“女性化”,作为一种危机和抵抗物种和繁殖的形式。本文探讨了女性身体在生理、经济、心理和社会上的可弃置性所面临的危机和批判。此外,本研究通过被禁锢在性别鸿沟中的霸权性别话语的中断和不稳定的镜头,重新质疑(女性)笑的物理、符号学、文化和政治传播的局限性。因此,我们要开辟一个空间来拷问“咯咯笑的讽刺”,作为对当代身体政治的一种抵抗形式——作为一个非场所,没有任何政治机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信