WHAT CAN BE LEARNED FROM SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING AT THE FRONTIER MARKETS? THE CASE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND NORTH MACEDONIA

K. Denčić-Mihajlov, K. Poposki, Milica Pavlovic
{"title":"WHAT CAN BE LEARNED FROM SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING AT THE FRONTIER MARKETS? THE CASE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND NORTH MACEDONIA","authors":"K. Denčić-Mihajlov, K. Poposki, Milica Pavlovic","doi":"10.22190/fueo210616017d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting practice at the frontier markets by using a comparative review of sustainability reporting practice according to the GRI framework. The research covers 31 companies included in the BELEXline and MBI10 indices in the period 2014-2018. The values of Social, Environmental, Economic and aggregate Sustainability Index, calculated using content analysis, indicate a low level of sustainability reporting practice. This is a consequence of a passive ownership and modest stakeholder pressures to the companies at two frontier markets and the lack of normative pressure on sustainability reporting. The grouping of the companies into clusters in accordance with the disclosure of sustainability indicators indicates significant inter- and intra-countries variations in practice. The reporting on sustainability issues differs among the companies according to their size, ownership structure, exchange market and industrial sector affiliation, which is on par with the developed capital markets.","PeriodicalId":31607,"journal":{"name":"Facta Universitatis Series Economics and Organization","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facta Universitatis Series Economics and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22190/fueo210616017d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper examines the corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting practice at the frontier markets by using a comparative review of sustainability reporting practice according to the GRI framework. The research covers 31 companies included in the BELEXline and MBI10 indices in the period 2014-2018. The values of Social, Environmental, Economic and aggregate Sustainability Index, calculated using content analysis, indicate a low level of sustainability reporting practice. This is a consequence of a passive ownership and modest stakeholder pressures to the companies at two frontier markets and the lack of normative pressure on sustainability reporting. The grouping of the companies into clusters in accordance with the disclosure of sustainability indicators indicates significant inter- and intra-countries variations in practice. The reporting on sustainability issues differs among the companies according to their size, ownership structure, exchange market and industrial sector affiliation, which is on par with the developed capital markets.
我们可以从前沿市场的可持续发展报告中学到什么?塞尔维亚共和国和北马其顿的案例
本文根据GRI框架,通过对可持续发展报告实践的比较回顾,考察了前沿市场的企业社会责任报告实践。该研究涵盖了2014-2018年期间BELEXline和MBI10指数中包含的31家公司。使用内容分析计算的社会、环境、经济和总可持续性指数的值表明,可持续发展报告实践水平较低。这是由于两个前沿市场的公司处于被动所有权和适度的利益相关者压力,以及缺乏可持续发展报告的规范压力。根据可持续性指标的披露将公司分组,表明在实践中国家之间和国家内部存在重大差异。根据公司规模、所有权结构、交易所市场和行业隶属关系,各公司对可持续发展问题的报告有所不同,这与发达资本市场相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信