The reform of the EU data protection framework in the context of the police and criminal justice sector: harmonisation, scope, oversight and enforcement

Q1 Social Sciences
M. M. Caruana
{"title":"The reform of the EU data protection framework in the context of the police and criminal justice sector: harmonisation, scope, oversight and enforcement","authors":"M. M. Caruana","doi":"10.1080/13600869.2017.1370224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper considers select emergent issues arising from the reform of the EU data protection framework, and how these might impact upon data processing in the law enforcement and criminal justice sectors. It analyses those aspects of the recently enacted Directive 2016/680 on data protection in the police and criminal justice sectors that will be determinative of its effective and consistent application in practice. It considers the extent to which the Principles laid down in Council of Europe Recommendation R(87)15 regulating the use of personal data in the police sector have been retained, adapted, strengthened, weakened or abandoned in Directive 2016/680. Certain problems arising from the Directive, not to mention the very medium of a Directive, separate from the General Regulation, as the instrument of choice, could be said to have been ‘writing on the wall’, as evidenced by the on-going discussions in the Commission expert group on the Regulation 2016/679 and Directive 2016/680 (E03461) on, for example, the complicated matter of delimitation between Directive 2016/680 and the General Data Protection Regulation (2016/679), oversight and enforcement; in particular, ensuring control by independent Supervisory Authorities, and international transfers and transfers to private parties.","PeriodicalId":53660,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Law, Computers and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Law, Computers and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2017.1370224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper considers select emergent issues arising from the reform of the EU data protection framework, and how these might impact upon data processing in the law enforcement and criminal justice sectors. It analyses those aspects of the recently enacted Directive 2016/680 on data protection in the police and criminal justice sectors that will be determinative of its effective and consistent application in practice. It considers the extent to which the Principles laid down in Council of Europe Recommendation R(87)15 regulating the use of personal data in the police sector have been retained, adapted, strengthened, weakened or abandoned in Directive 2016/680. Certain problems arising from the Directive, not to mention the very medium of a Directive, separate from the General Regulation, as the instrument of choice, could be said to have been ‘writing on the wall’, as evidenced by the on-going discussions in the Commission expert group on the Regulation 2016/679 and Directive 2016/680 (E03461) on, for example, the complicated matter of delimitation between Directive 2016/680 and the General Data Protection Regulation (2016/679), oversight and enforcement; in particular, ensuring control by independent Supervisory Authorities, and international transfers and transfers to private parties.
在警察和刑事司法部门背景下欧盟数据保护框架的改革:协调、范围、监督和执行
本文考虑了欧盟数据保护框架改革中出现的一些紧急问题,以及这些问题如何影响执法和刑事司法部门的数据处理。它分析了最近颁布的关于警察和刑事司法部门数据保护的第2016/680号指令的那些方面,这些方面将决定其在实践中的有效和一致的应用。它考虑了在指令2016/680中保留、调整、加强、削弱或放弃欧洲委员会建议R(87)15中规定的规范警察部门使用个人数据的原则的程度。该指令产生的某些问题,更不用说指令的媒介,与一般法规分开,作为选择的工具,可以说是“写在墙上”,正如委员会专家组正在进行的关于法规2016/679和指令2016/680 (E03461)的讨论所证明的那样,例如,指令2016/680与通用数据保护法规(2016/679)之间界限的复杂问题。监督和执行;特别是,确保独立监管机构的控制,以及国际转移和向私人方的转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信