THE PROBLEM OF PROOF IN EMPIRICAL AND THEORETICAL KNOWLEDGE

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
O. B. Shustova, G. Sidorov
{"title":"THE PROBLEM OF PROOF IN EMPIRICAL AND THEORETICAL KNOWLEDGE","authors":"O. B. Shustova, G. Sidorov","doi":"10.22363/2224-7580-2022-3-46-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents arguments about the problem of proof in science. This problem was raised in antiquity at the time of Plato and Aristotle. At present, science uses a wide range of evidence, but not all of them meet the requirements of adequacy and consistency. Proof is often associated with belief and belief in the truth of a proposition. Therefore, the term “proof” is not defined unambiguously and a pluralistic approach is preferable to it, including not only scientific, but also metaphysical worldview. The article continues the author's analysis of the concept of information as the content of the laws of the external world, which is revealed to people after they adapt their bodily and “mental” sense organs to it. It is substantiated that not a single single worldview can become a rationale for explaining the whole picture of the material Universe and, moreover, the metaphysical being.","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2022-3-46-53","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents arguments about the problem of proof in science. This problem was raised in antiquity at the time of Plato and Aristotle. At present, science uses a wide range of evidence, but not all of them meet the requirements of adequacy and consistency. Proof is often associated with belief and belief in the truth of a proposition. Therefore, the term “proof” is not defined unambiguously and a pluralistic approach is preferable to it, including not only scientific, but also metaphysical worldview. The article continues the author's analysis of the concept of information as the content of the laws of the external world, which is revealed to people after they adapt their bodily and “mental” sense organs to it. It is substantiated that not a single single worldview can become a rationale for explaining the whole picture of the material Universe and, moreover, the metaphysical being.
实证和理论知识中的证明问题
这篇文章提出了关于科学证明问题的争论。这个问题在古代柏拉图和亚里士多德时代就提出了。目前,科学使用的证据范围很广,但并非所有证据都符合充分性和一致性的要求。证明常常与信念和对命题的真实性的信念联系在一起。因此,“证明”一词的定义并不明确,更可取的是一种多元的方法,不仅包括科学的,而且包括形而上学的世界观。文章继续分析了信息的概念,认为信息是外部世界规律的内容,是人的身体和“精神”感觉器官适应了外部世界规律后才显现出来的。事实证明,没有一个单一的世界观可以成为解释整个物质宇宙的基本原理,而且,形而上学的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS
REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信