Cortical Bone Area Predicts Incident Fractures Independently of Areal Bone Mineral Density in Older Men

C. Ohlsson, D. Sundh, Andreas Wallerek, M. Nilsson, M. Karlsson, H. Johansson, D. Mellström, M. Lorentzon
{"title":"Cortical Bone Area Predicts Incident Fractures Independently of Areal Bone Mineral Density in Older Men","authors":"C. Ohlsson, D. Sundh, Andreas Wallerek, M. Nilsson, M. Karlsson, H. Johansson, D. Mellström, M. Lorentzon","doi":"10.1210/jc.2016-3177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used clinically to predict fracture but does not discriminate between trabecular and cortical bone assessment. Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether information on cortical and trabecular bone predict fracture risk independently of aBMD and clinical risk factors. Design and Participants: Cortical area, bone mass, porosity, and trabecular bone volume fraction (BVTV) were measured at the tibia using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in 456 men (80.2 ± 3.5 years) recruited from the general population in Gothenburg, Sweden. aBMD was measured using DXA. Incident fractures (71 men) were X-ray verified. Associations were evaluated using Cox regression. Results: Cortical area [hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation (SD) decrease, 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.58 to 2.65], cortical bone mass (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.70), and BVTV (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.07), but not cortical porosity, were independently associated with fracture risk. These associations remained after adjustment for femoral neck aBMD and Fracture Risk Assessment risk factors (area: HR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.44 to 2.66; mass: HR 1.99, 95% CI, 1.45 to 2.74; BV/TV: HR 1.46, 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.96). After entering BV/TV and cortical area or bone mass simultaneously in the adjusted models, only the cortical parameters remained important predictors of fracture. Conclusion: HR-pQCT measurement of cortical area and mass might add clinically useful information for the evaluation of fracture risk.","PeriodicalId":22632,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"51 1","pages":"516–524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-3177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Context: Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used clinically to predict fracture but does not discriminate between trabecular and cortical bone assessment. Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether information on cortical and trabecular bone predict fracture risk independently of aBMD and clinical risk factors. Design and Participants: Cortical area, bone mass, porosity, and trabecular bone volume fraction (BVTV) were measured at the tibia using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in 456 men (80.2 ± 3.5 years) recruited from the general population in Gothenburg, Sweden. aBMD was measured using DXA. Incident fractures (71 men) were X-ray verified. Associations were evaluated using Cox regression. Results: Cortical area [hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation (SD) decrease, 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.58 to 2.65], cortical bone mass (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.70), and BVTV (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.07), but not cortical porosity, were independently associated with fracture risk. These associations remained after adjustment for femoral neck aBMD and Fracture Risk Assessment risk factors (area: HR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.44 to 2.66; mass: HR 1.99, 95% CI, 1.45 to 2.74; BV/TV: HR 1.46, 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.96). After entering BV/TV and cortical area or bone mass simultaneously in the adjusted models, only the cortical parameters remained important predictors of fracture. Conclusion: HR-pQCT measurement of cortical area and mass might add clinically useful information for the evaluation of fracture risk.
老年男性皮质骨面积与骨矿物质密度独立预测骨折事件
背景:使用双能x线骨密度仪(DXA)测量的面骨矿物质密度(aBMD)在临床上用于预测骨折,但不能区分小梁骨和皮质骨评估。目的:本研究旨在探讨皮质骨和骨小梁信息是否独立于aBMD和临床危险因素预测骨折风险。设计和参与者:采用高分辨率外周定量计算机断层扫描(HR-pQCT)测量了456名男性(80.2±3.5岁)的胫骨皮质面积、骨量、孔隙度和骨小梁体积分数(BVTV)。用DXA测定aBMD。对71例男性的偶发性骨折进行了x线检查。使用Cox回归评估相关性。结果:皮质面积[每标准差风险比(HR) (SD)降低,2.05;95%可信区间(CI), 1.58 ~ 2.65],皮质骨量(HR, 2.07;95% CI, 1.58 ~ 2.70)和BVTV (HR, 1.62;95% CI, 1.26 - 2.07),但皮质孔隙度与骨折风险无关。在调整股骨颈aBMD和骨折风险评估危险因素后,这些相关性仍然存在(区域:HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.44 ~ 2.66;质量:HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.45 ~ 2.74;BV/TV: HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.09 ~ 1.96)。在调整后的模型中同时输入BV/TV和皮质面积或骨量后,只有皮质参数仍然是骨折的重要预测因子。结论:HR-pQCT测量皮质面积和质量可为骨折风险评估提供临床有用信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信