Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Different Velopharyngeal Closure Patterns

Hanyao Huang, H. Yin, Yang Wang, Nan Chen, Dantong Huang, Xiangyou Luo, Xing Yin, Q. Zheng, B. Shi, Jingtao Li
{"title":"Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Different Velopharyngeal Closure Patterns","authors":"Hanyao Huang, H. Yin, Yang Wang, Nan Chen, Dantong Huang, Xiangyou Luo, Xing Yin, Q. Zheng, B. Shi, Jingtao Li","doi":"10.1177/0003489419879176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Velopharyngeal (VP) closure has high impact on the quality of life, especially in patients with cleft palate. For better understanding the VP closure, it is important to understand the airflow dynamics of different closure patterns, including circular, coronal, sagittal, and circular with a Passavant’s ridge. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the airflow characteristics of different velopharyngeal closure patterns. Methods: Sixteen adults with no notable upper airway abnormality who needed multislice spiral computed tomography scans as part of their clinical care. Airways were reconstructed. A cylinder and a cuboid were used to replace the VP port in three models of VP port patterns. Flow simulations were carried using computational fluid dynamics. Airflow pressures in the VP orifice, oral cavity and nasal cavity, as well as airflow velocity through the velopharyngeal orifice, were calculated. Results: The airflow dynamics at the velopharynx were different among different velopharyngeal patterns as the area of the velopharyngeal port increased from 0 to 25 mm2. The orifice areas of different closure conditions in four velopharyngeal closure patterns were significantly different. The maximal orifice area for adequate velopharyngeal closure was 7.57 mm2 in the coronal pattern and 6.21 mm2 in the sagittal pattern. Conclusions: Airflow dynamics of the velopharynx were correlated to the velopharyngeal closure patterns. Different closure patterns had different largest permitted orifice areas for getting the appropriate oral pressures for normal speech.","PeriodicalId":8361,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology","volume":"70 1","pages":"157 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489419879176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective: Velopharyngeal (VP) closure has high impact on the quality of life, especially in patients with cleft palate. For better understanding the VP closure, it is important to understand the airflow dynamics of different closure patterns, including circular, coronal, sagittal, and circular with a Passavant’s ridge. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the airflow characteristics of different velopharyngeal closure patterns. Methods: Sixteen adults with no notable upper airway abnormality who needed multislice spiral computed tomography scans as part of their clinical care. Airways were reconstructed. A cylinder and a cuboid were used to replace the VP port in three models of VP port patterns. Flow simulations were carried using computational fluid dynamics. Airflow pressures in the VP orifice, oral cavity and nasal cavity, as well as airflow velocity through the velopharyngeal orifice, were calculated. Results: The airflow dynamics at the velopharynx were different among different velopharyngeal patterns as the area of the velopharyngeal port increased from 0 to 25 mm2. The orifice areas of different closure conditions in four velopharyngeal closure patterns were significantly different. The maximal orifice area for adequate velopharyngeal closure was 7.57 mm2 in the coronal pattern and 6.21 mm2 in the sagittal pattern. Conclusions: Airflow dynamics of the velopharynx were correlated to the velopharyngeal closure patterns. Different closure patterns had different largest permitted orifice areas for getting the appropriate oral pressures for normal speech.
不同腭咽闭合模式的计算流体动力学分析
目的:腭咽闭合对腭裂患者的生活质量有重要影响。为了更好地理解VP闭合,了解不同闭合模式的气流动力学是很重要的,包括圆形、冠状、矢状和带Passavant脊的圆形。本研究的目的是展示不同的咽瓣闭合模式的气流特性。方法:16例无明显上呼吸道异常的成人,需要多层螺旋ct扫描作为临床护理的一部分。气道重建。在三种VP端口模式中,采用圆柱体和长方体代替VP端口。利用计算流体力学进行了流动模拟。计算VP口、口腔、鼻腔内的气流压力以及通过腭咽口的气流速度。结果:随着舌咽口面积从0 mm2增加到25 mm2,舌咽处的气流动力学在不同的舌咽形态中有所不同。在4种腭咽闭合方式中,不同闭合条件下的口面积有显著差异。冠状面和矢状面最大口面积分别为7.57 mm2和6.21 mm2。结论:腭咽气流动力学与腭咽闭合模式相关。不同的闭合方式有不同的最大允许孔面积,以获得正常言语所需的适当口腔压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信