Topical Rifamycin Prophylaxis in Gynecological and Obstetric Surgery

Nahit Ata, M. Kulhan, N. G. Kulhan, C. Turkler, A. Bilgi, Ç. Çelik
{"title":"Topical Rifamycin Prophylaxis in Gynecological and Obstetric Surgery","authors":"Nahit Ata, M. Kulhan, N. G. Kulhan, C. Turkler, A. Bilgi, Ç. Çelik","doi":"10.21613/gorm.2021.1193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: Antibiotic prophylaxis is one of the most important steps to reduce surgical site infections. First-generation cephalosporin (cefazolin) is used prophylactically in the majority of operations. Rifamycin is a broad-spectrum semisynthetic antibiotic that is bactericidal against gram (+) and gram (˗) microorganisms. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies on the use of rifamycin in antibiotic prophylaxis. In this study, we aimed to analyze whether there is a difference between the use of only cefazolin and only rifamycin in terms of surgical site infections. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred patients were included in this case-control study during the last quarter period of 2017. These patients (n=100) were divided into two groups according to their antibiotic use; 50 patients who received only 1 g cefazolin constituted Group 1, 50 patients who received only 250 mg topical rifamycin over the incision line based on surgeon’s preference constituted Group 2. RESULTS: The use of prophylactic topical rifamycin reduced the incidence of wound infection. compared with cefazolin. Surgical site infection was detected in 5 (10%) of the patients who received cefazolin, whereas surgical site infection was not observed in patients who received rifamycin (p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The use of topical rifamycin is effective but does not imply that systemic antibiotics should replace prophylaxis. The use of rifamycin would aid in systemic antibiotic prophylaxis.","PeriodicalId":87233,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21613/gorm.2021.1193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Antibiotic prophylaxis is one of the most important steps to reduce surgical site infections. First-generation cephalosporin (cefazolin) is used prophylactically in the majority of operations. Rifamycin is a broad-spectrum semisynthetic antibiotic that is bactericidal against gram (+) and gram (˗) microorganisms. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies on the use of rifamycin in antibiotic prophylaxis. In this study, we aimed to analyze whether there is a difference between the use of only cefazolin and only rifamycin in terms of surgical site infections. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred patients were included in this case-control study during the last quarter period of 2017. These patients (n=100) were divided into two groups according to their antibiotic use; 50 patients who received only 1 g cefazolin constituted Group 1, 50 patients who received only 250 mg topical rifamycin over the incision line based on surgeon’s preference constituted Group 2. RESULTS: The use of prophylactic topical rifamycin reduced the incidence of wound infection. compared with cefazolin. Surgical site infection was detected in 5 (10%) of the patients who received cefazolin, whereas surgical site infection was not observed in patients who received rifamycin (p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The use of topical rifamycin is effective but does not imply that systemic antibiotics should replace prophylaxis. The use of rifamycin would aid in systemic antibiotic prophylaxis.
局部利福霉素预防在妇科和产科手术
目的:抗生素预防是减少手术部位感染的重要步骤之一。第一代头孢菌素(头孢唑林)在大多数手术中是预防性使用的。利福霉素是一种广谱半合成抗生素,对革兰氏+和革兰氏微生物具有杀菌作用。据我们所知,没有关于利福霉素用于抗生素预防的研究。在本研究中,我们旨在分析仅使用头孢唑林和仅使用利福霉素在手术部位感染方面是否存在差异。研究设计:在2017年最后一个季度,100名患者被纳入这项病例对照研究。这些患者(n=100)根据抗生素使用情况分为两组;50例仅使用1 g头孢唑林的患者为第1组,50例根据术者喜好仅在切口线上局部使用250 mg利福霉素的患者为第2组。结果:预防性外用利福霉素降低了创面感染的发生率。与头孢唑林比较。头孢唑林组手术部位感染发生率为5%(10%),而利福霉素组未发生手术部位感染(p=0.022)。结论:外用利福霉素是有效的,但并不意味着全身性抗生素应该取代预防。利福霉素的使用将有助于全身性抗生素预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信