Effect of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation on improving root canal cleanliness after post space preparation: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study
R. Yunus, R. Meidyawati, A. Margono, A. Prameswhari
{"title":"Effect of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation on improving root canal cleanliness after post space preparation: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study","authors":"R. Yunus, R. Meidyawati, A. Margono, A. Prameswhari","doi":"10.4103/sej.sej_6_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Removing the secondary smear layer has been presumed to increase the micromechanical retention of fiber posts. The additional use of irrigation techniques is intended to improve the cleanliness of the root canal walls. The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation techniques on root canal cleanliness after the post space preparation. Materials and Methods: A total of 27 extracted single-rooted premolar samples underwent root canal treatment using gutta-percha and AH Plus that was labeled with rhodamine B. Gutta-percha was removed during the post preparation. The sample was then divided into three groups (n = 9): irrigation with sonic activation, ultrasonic activation, or without activation, respectively. The teeth were subsequently cut in the middle third area of the root, and the remnant of smear layers was observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope. Cleanliness was expressed as a percentage of the angle that contained part of the red area representing the smear layer. The results were statistically analyzed with a one-way ANOVA test and post hoc Bonferroni test set at 5% significance level. Results: The sonic group had the greatest percentage of root canal wall cleanliness (89.00 ± 2.77), followed by the ultrasonic (78.33 ± 3.09) and nonactivated groups (67.77 ± 3.37). Conversely, there was no significant difference in root canal wall cleanliness between the sonic and ultrasonic groups (P = 0.067) or the ultrasonic and nonactivation groups (P = 0.071). Conclusions: Irrigation with sonic activation improved cleanliness of the root canal dentinal wall after post space preparation.","PeriodicalId":21485,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"38 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_6_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Removing the secondary smear layer has been presumed to increase the micromechanical retention of fiber posts. The additional use of irrigation techniques is intended to improve the cleanliness of the root canal walls. The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation techniques on root canal cleanliness after the post space preparation. Materials and Methods: A total of 27 extracted single-rooted premolar samples underwent root canal treatment using gutta-percha and AH Plus that was labeled with rhodamine B. Gutta-percha was removed during the post preparation. The sample was then divided into three groups (n = 9): irrigation with sonic activation, ultrasonic activation, or without activation, respectively. The teeth were subsequently cut in the middle third area of the root, and the remnant of smear layers was observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope. Cleanliness was expressed as a percentage of the angle that contained part of the red area representing the smear layer. The results were statistically analyzed with a one-way ANOVA test and post hoc Bonferroni test set at 5% significance level. Results: The sonic group had the greatest percentage of root canal wall cleanliness (89.00 ± 2.77), followed by the ultrasonic (78.33 ± 3.09) and nonactivated groups (67.77 ± 3.37). Conversely, there was no significant difference in root canal wall cleanliness between the sonic and ultrasonic groups (P = 0.067) or the ultrasonic and nonactivation groups (P = 0.071). Conclusions: Irrigation with sonic activation improved cleanliness of the root canal dentinal wall after post space preparation.
期刊介绍:
Vision SEJ aims to be one of the foremost worldwide periodical on Endodontics, dedicated to the promotion of research, post-graduate training and further education in Endodontics. Mission Statement To serve as a medium for continued Endodontic education and qualitative scientific publications on clinical trials, basic science related to the biological aspects of Endodontics, basic science related to Endodontic techniques as well as dental trauma that will ultimately improve the Endodontic research and patient’s health. Scope In this journal, Endodontists, Endodontic postgraduate students and general dentists, can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation that help them keep pace with rapid changes in this field. Aims and Objectives To publish cut edge peer-review original articles, case reports, letters to the editor, editorials, review articles, commentaries, and innovations that will impact on Endodontics. To enhance exchange of ideas/information relating to Endodontics and interaction among stakeholders. To encourage networking and partnership between individuals, government and non-governmental organizations for the provision of quality health care. To advocate for training, workshops, seminars, scientific manuscript writing conferences that will advance publishing culture.