Attachment, Pride, and Respect: Exploration of a Multidimensional Tool to Measure Appalachian Identity

Kelly Foster, Oceane Tanny, C. Freeland, Haley Metcalf
{"title":"Attachment, Pride, and Respect: Exploration of a Multidimensional Tool to Measure Appalachian Identity","authors":"Kelly Foster, Oceane Tanny, C. Freeland, Haley Metcalf","doi":"10.5406/jappastud.27.2.0220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Most scholars have refuted the notion that a region as diverse as Appalachia can have one unifying identity. Despite the challenges to measuring Appalachian identity, we maintain that this work is critical to understanding the influence that identity has on both the individual and the community. This study uses data from a 2016 study of women in Central, South Central, and Southern Appalachia. In this research, we examine the modification of the Multidimensional Inventory of Black Identity (MIBI) for use among Appalachian populations as a more complete measure of identity, finding that the overall seventeen-item Appalachian identity scale is highly reliable with a Cronbach’s alpha of .879. All three subscales—centrality, public regard, and private regard—had highly reliable Cronbach’s alpha scores. Much like the original MIBI, this modified scale appears to be a reliable measure of Appalachian identity. In addition, the subscales allow nuance in analysis that is not available by utilizing only one variable. We put this work forward in hopes that other researchers will be able to integrate it into their research and open new avenues of understanding with regard to the impact that identifying as an Appalachian may have on one’s health, wellness, and quality of life.","PeriodicalId":93112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian studies","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Appalachian studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jappastud.27.2.0220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most scholars have refuted the notion that a region as diverse as Appalachia can have one unifying identity. Despite the challenges to measuring Appalachian identity, we maintain that this work is critical to understanding the influence that identity has on both the individual and the community. This study uses data from a 2016 study of women in Central, South Central, and Southern Appalachia. In this research, we examine the modification of the Multidimensional Inventory of Black Identity (MIBI) for use among Appalachian populations as a more complete measure of identity, finding that the overall seventeen-item Appalachian identity scale is highly reliable with a Cronbach’s alpha of .879. All three subscales—centrality, public regard, and private regard—had highly reliable Cronbach’s alpha scores. Much like the original MIBI, this modified scale appears to be a reliable measure of Appalachian identity. In addition, the subscales allow nuance in analysis that is not available by utilizing only one variable. We put this work forward in hopes that other researchers will be able to integrate it into their research and open new avenues of understanding with regard to the impact that identifying as an Appalachian may have on one’s health, wellness, and quality of life.
依恋、骄傲和尊重:探索测量阿巴拉契亚身份的多维工具
大多数学者都反驳了像阿巴拉契亚这样多样化的地区可以有一个统一的身份的观点。尽管测量阿巴拉契亚身份存在挑战,但我们认为这项工作对于理解身份对个人和社区的影响至关重要。这项研究使用了2016年对阿巴拉契亚中部、中南部和南部女性的研究数据。在本研究中,我们检验了在阿巴拉契亚人群中使用的黑人身份多维量表(MIBI)的修改,作为一个更完整的身份测量,发现整体17个项目的阿巴拉契亚身份量表具有很高的可靠性,Cronbach 's alpha为0.879。所有三个分量表——中心性、公众关注和私人关注——都有高度可靠的Cronbach alpha分数。就像最初的MIBI一样,这个修改后的量表似乎是衡量阿巴拉契亚人身份的可靠方法。此外,子量表允许分析中的细微差别,这是仅利用一个变量无法获得的。我们提出这项工作是希望其他研究人员能够将其整合到他们的研究中,并开辟新的理解途径,了解作为阿巴拉契亚人可能对一个人的健康、健康和生活质量产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信