Increasing Production Flow Rate and Overall Recovery from Gas Hydrate Reservoirs Using a Combined Steam Flooding-Thermodynamic Inhibitor Technique

Sherif Fakher, H. Abdelaal, Y. Elgahawy, Ahmed El Tonbary, Abdulmohsin Imqam
{"title":"Increasing Production Flow Rate and Overall Recovery from Gas Hydrate Reservoirs Using a Combined Steam Flooding-Thermodynamic Inhibitor Technique","authors":"Sherif Fakher, H. Abdelaal, Y. Elgahawy, Ahmed El Tonbary, Abdulmohsin Imqam","doi":"10.2118/191179-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n When producing from gas hydrate reservoirs using steam flooding, since hydrate dissociation is an endothermic reaction, the heat is used up. This results in a decrease in reservoir temperature which causes the hydrate equilibrium conditions to be established again, thus causing hydrate reformation. This research studies the effect of injecting thermodynamic inhibitors during steam injection on overcoming the problem of hydrate reformation which in turn will increase hydrocarbon recovery significantly from hydrate reservoirs. The reservoir model was built based on data collected from previous models found in the literature. After specifying all parameters for the reservoir, and the hydrate layer, a systematic study was performed in order to assess the use of inhibitors with steam flooding. The production methods studied include depressurization, steam flooding, inhibitor injection including both brine and glycol, and finally the combined steam flooding inhibitor injection method. The conditions for the steam flooding were kept the same during all runs in order to be able to compare them. Results indicated that the use of the thermal stimulation alone without inhibitor managed to increase recovery, however, the problem of hydrate reformation occurred which caused a cessation of production. Using inhibitors alone managed to increase recovery as well, however the recovery increase was much less compared to thermal stimulation. The type of inhibitor also played a role in recovery with the glycol producing the most, followed by the brine. By combining both steam flooding and inhibitor injection, the recovery increased significantly more than what was observed when using each of the methods on its own. To the authors' knowledge, no extensive study has been performed by combining both steam flooding and inhibitor to increase hydrocarbon recovery from hydrate reservoirs. This research can help in improving real field gas hydrate projects by making the overall project much more economic by increasing hydrocarbon recovery.","PeriodicalId":11006,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, June 27, 2018","volume":"19 12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, June 27, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191179-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

When producing from gas hydrate reservoirs using steam flooding, since hydrate dissociation is an endothermic reaction, the heat is used up. This results in a decrease in reservoir temperature which causes the hydrate equilibrium conditions to be established again, thus causing hydrate reformation. This research studies the effect of injecting thermodynamic inhibitors during steam injection on overcoming the problem of hydrate reformation which in turn will increase hydrocarbon recovery significantly from hydrate reservoirs. The reservoir model was built based on data collected from previous models found in the literature. After specifying all parameters for the reservoir, and the hydrate layer, a systematic study was performed in order to assess the use of inhibitors with steam flooding. The production methods studied include depressurization, steam flooding, inhibitor injection including both brine and glycol, and finally the combined steam flooding inhibitor injection method. The conditions for the steam flooding were kept the same during all runs in order to be able to compare them. Results indicated that the use of the thermal stimulation alone without inhibitor managed to increase recovery, however, the problem of hydrate reformation occurred which caused a cessation of production. Using inhibitors alone managed to increase recovery as well, however the recovery increase was much less compared to thermal stimulation. The type of inhibitor also played a role in recovery with the glycol producing the most, followed by the brine. By combining both steam flooding and inhibitor injection, the recovery increased significantly more than what was observed when using each of the methods on its own. To the authors' knowledge, no extensive study has been performed by combining both steam flooding and inhibitor to increase hydrocarbon recovery from hydrate reservoirs. This research can help in improving real field gas hydrate projects by making the overall project much more economic by increasing hydrocarbon recovery.
采用蒸汽驱-热力学抑制剂联合技术提高天然气水合物生产流量和总采收率
当使用蒸汽驱从天然气水合物储层开采时,由于水合物解离是一个吸热反应,热量被消耗殆尽。这导致储层温度降低,导致水合物平衡条件再次建立,从而引起水合物重整。研究了注汽过程中注入热力学抑制剂对克服水合物重整问题的作用,从而显著提高水合物储层的油气采收率。储层模型是根据文献中先前模型收集的数据建立的。在确定了储层和水合物层的所有参数后,进行了系统的研究,以评估蒸汽驱抑制剂的使用情况。研究的生产方法包括减压、蒸汽驱、注入卤水和乙二醇抑制剂,最后是联合注入蒸汽驱抑制剂的方法。在所有运行期间,蒸汽驱的条件保持相同,以便能够进行比较。结果表明,单独使用热增产而不使用抑制剂可以提高采收率,但会出现水合物重整问题,导致停产。单独使用抑制剂也可以提高采收率,但与热增产相比,采收率的提高要小得多。缓蚀剂的类型对采收率也有影响,乙二醇产量最大,其次是盐水。通过将蒸汽驱和抑制剂注入相结合,采收率明显高于单独使用每种方法时的采收率。据作者所知,目前还没有进行过将蒸汽驱和抑制剂结合使用以提高水合物油藏油气采收率的广泛研究。该研究可以通过提高油气采收率,使整个项目更加经济,从而有助于改进实际油田天然气水合物项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信