Why Things Happen and Why They Don't: Causality and Contingency in "The Snows of Kilimanjaro" and "One Reader Writes"

Kevin R. West
{"title":"Why Things Happen and Why They Don't: Causality and Contingency in \"The Snows of Kilimanjaro\" and \"One Reader Writes\"","authors":"Kevin R. West","doi":"10.1353/hem.2022.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:\"The Snows of Kilimanjaro\" and \"One Reader Writes,\" although very different in their reception histories, nevertheless share a crucial verbal and thematic parallel: each story contains similarly worded speculation on how a particular illness (gangrene and syphilis, respectively) came to be contracted. By wondering whether or not the illness in question had to happen, Helen and the unnamed \"Reader\" invite broader consideration of causality and contingency. In the case of \"Snows,\" this inquiry into contingency pertains also to Harry's concerns as to why he failed to write the stories that he might have written.","PeriodicalId":22434,"journal":{"name":"The Hemingway Review","volume":"2014 1","pages":"130 - 135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hemingway Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hem.2022.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:"The Snows of Kilimanjaro" and "One Reader Writes," although very different in their reception histories, nevertheless share a crucial verbal and thematic parallel: each story contains similarly worded speculation on how a particular illness (gangrene and syphilis, respectively) came to be contracted. By wondering whether or not the illness in question had to happen, Helen and the unnamed "Reader" invite broader consideration of causality and contingency. In the case of "Snows," this inquiry into contingency pertains also to Harry's concerns as to why he failed to write the stories that he might have written.
事情发生的原因和不发生的原因:《乞力马扎罗山的雪》和《一个读者写道》中的因果关系和偶然性
摘要:《乞力马扎罗山的雪》和《一个读者写道》虽然在接受历史上有很大的不同,但在语言和主题上却有一个重要的相似之处:每个故事都包含了关于一种特定疾病(分别是坏疽和梅毒)是如何被感染的类似措辞的猜测。通过思考这种疾病是否一定会发生,海伦和这位不知名的“读者”引发了对因果关系和偶然性的更广泛思考。就《雪》而言,这种对偶然性的探究也与哈利的担忧有关,即他为什么没能写出他本可以写出的故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信