Abstract LB-159: The bench with bedside initiative: A “trans-relational” approach to translational research

B. Salhia
{"title":"Abstract LB-159: The bench with bedside initiative: A “trans-relational” approach to translational research","authors":"B. Salhia","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-LB-159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Translational research necessitates the use of human specimens. As per the regulations for the protection of human subjects, study participants (SP) are not required to be informed of the outcomes of research. While individual results should mostly not be reported back to patients to avoid anxiety and misinterpretation of yet to be proven data, general research results should be delivered back to the study participants. It can be argued that SP/researcher relationships are inadequately developed in most cases and that research lacks in transparency. As such, The Bench with Bedside Initiative™ (TBBI) was launched to serve as a trans-relational approach to conducting translational research, where scientists at the bench collaborate and engage with SP at the bedside. As an initial effort of TBBI™ social media and grass roots efforts were used to identify breast cancer survivors to donate blood for a blood-based biomarker study. A web-based survey (https://thebenchwithbedsideinitiative.usc.edu/) was used to determine eligibility and perceptions for enhanced involvement. The study was described to the future SP as a long-term collaboration with the lead researcher where data transparency would be integral to the study design. A total of 316 women completed the survey in a three-month period. When asked, 85% of survey takers said they would be very interested in getting updates on the use of their samples and 100% said they want to know the outcomes of the research. Furthermore, 76% said they had a moral and ethical right to learn the fate of their sample. A total of 86% of survey takers said they would be interested in building a relationship with the research scientist. Among the most widely used words in the comment box were empowering, involvement, hope, future, important, progress, and information. Of 316 women, 132 were deemed eligible to donate blood. As part of TBBI™ 59 eligible SP travelled to meet the PI and under informed consent donated blood in the PI’s lab. SP represented every major racial and ethnic group and socioeconomic background. SP came from 30 cities and traveled an average of 50 miles and as far as 675 miles. The use of biospecimens and associated data for research entails significant ethical obligations to the individuals from whom those specimens were obtained. Researchers owe it to themselves and to their SP to provide information as soon as it becomes available. While the long-term outcomes are yet to be determined, the perceived benefits to a trans-relational approach to conducting human research include diversification of study participants, ease of long-term follow-up, improved clinical trial enrollment, better accountability of resources, and not least of all is providing a lot of hope to those we are trying the hardest to help. Citation Format: Bodour Salhia. The bench with bedside initiative: A “trans-relational” approach to translational research [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-159.","PeriodicalId":21579,"journal":{"name":"Science and Health Policy","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-LB-159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Translational research necessitates the use of human specimens. As per the regulations for the protection of human subjects, study participants (SP) are not required to be informed of the outcomes of research. While individual results should mostly not be reported back to patients to avoid anxiety and misinterpretation of yet to be proven data, general research results should be delivered back to the study participants. It can be argued that SP/researcher relationships are inadequately developed in most cases and that research lacks in transparency. As such, The Bench with Bedside Initiative™ (TBBI) was launched to serve as a trans-relational approach to conducting translational research, where scientists at the bench collaborate and engage with SP at the bedside. As an initial effort of TBBI™ social media and grass roots efforts were used to identify breast cancer survivors to donate blood for a blood-based biomarker study. A web-based survey (https://thebenchwithbedsideinitiative.usc.edu/) was used to determine eligibility and perceptions for enhanced involvement. The study was described to the future SP as a long-term collaboration with the lead researcher where data transparency would be integral to the study design. A total of 316 women completed the survey in a three-month period. When asked, 85% of survey takers said they would be very interested in getting updates on the use of their samples and 100% said they want to know the outcomes of the research. Furthermore, 76% said they had a moral and ethical right to learn the fate of their sample. A total of 86% of survey takers said they would be interested in building a relationship with the research scientist. Among the most widely used words in the comment box were empowering, involvement, hope, future, important, progress, and information. Of 316 women, 132 were deemed eligible to donate blood. As part of TBBI™ 59 eligible SP travelled to meet the PI and under informed consent donated blood in the PI’s lab. SP represented every major racial and ethnic group and socioeconomic background. SP came from 30 cities and traveled an average of 50 miles and as far as 675 miles. The use of biospecimens and associated data for research entails significant ethical obligations to the individuals from whom those specimens were obtained. Researchers owe it to themselves and to their SP to provide information as soon as it becomes available. While the long-term outcomes are yet to be determined, the perceived benefits to a trans-relational approach to conducting human research include diversification of study participants, ease of long-term follow-up, improved clinical trial enrollment, better accountability of resources, and not least of all is providing a lot of hope to those we are trying the hardest to help. Citation Format: Bodour Salhia. The bench with bedside initiative: A “trans-relational” approach to translational research [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-159.
摘要LB-159:具有床边主动性的工作台:转化研究的“跨关系”方法
转化研究需要使用人体标本。根据保护人类受试者的规定,研究参与者(SP)不需要被告知研究结果。虽然个别结果大多不应报告给患者,以避免焦虑和对尚未证实的数据的误解,但一般研究结果应传回给研究参与者。可以认为,在大多数情况下,SP/研究者的关系没有充分发展,研究缺乏透明度。因此,The Bench with床边倡议™(TBBI)的推出是为了作为一种跨关系的方法来进行转化研究,在这里,实验台上的科学家与床边的SP合作和互动。作为TBBI™的最初努力,社交媒体和基层努力被用来识别乳腺癌幸存者,为一项基于血液的生物标志物研究献血。一项基于网络的调查(https://thebenchwithbedsideinitiative.usc.edu/)被用来确定是否有资格和对加强参与的看法。该研究向未来的SP描述为与首席研究员的长期合作,数据透明度将是研究设计不可或缺的一部分。共有316名女性在三个月的时间里完成了这项调查。当被问及这一问题时,85%的受访者表示他们非常有兴趣了解样本使用的最新情况,100%的受访者表示他们想知道研究结果。此外,76%的人表示,他们在道德和伦理上有权了解样本的命运。总共有86%的受访者表示,他们有兴趣与研究科学家建立关系。评论框中使用最广泛的词汇是赋权、参与、希望、未来、重要、进步和信息。在316名女性中,有132人被认为有资格献血。作为TBBI™59的一部分,符合条件的SP前往PI并在知情同意的情况下在PI的实验室献血。社会党代表了所有主要的种族和民族以及社会经济背景。SP来自30个城市,平均行驶50英里,最远行驶675英里。使用生物标本和相关数据进行研究需要对获得这些标本的个人承担重大的伦理义务。研究人员有责任为他们自己和他们的SP提供信息,一旦有信息可用。虽然长期结果还有待确定,但跨关系方法进行人体研究的好处包括研究参与者的多样化,长期随访的便利性,改进临床试验登记,更好的资源责任,最重要的是为那些我们正在努力帮助的人提供了很多希望。引文格式:Bodour Salhia。床边主动的板凳:转化研究的“跨关系”方法[摘要]。摘自:2019年美国癌症研究协会年会论文集;2019年3月29日至4月3日;亚特兰大,乔治亚州。费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(13增刊):摘要nr LB-159。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信