Evaluation of cardiac autonomic status using QTc interval in patients with leprosy

J. Solanki, A. Thesia, Hitarth N. Mehta, C. Shah, Hemant Mehta
{"title":"Evaluation of cardiac autonomic status using QTc interval in patients with leprosy","authors":"J. Solanki, A. Thesia, Hitarth N. Mehta, C. Shah, Hemant Mehta","doi":"10.4103/2468-5577.187081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of studies on leprosy mainly focus on its somatic symptoms. There are few reports on evaluation of cardiac autonomic status by QTc interval. We performed a cross-sectional, case-control study to investigate the QTc (QT corrected for heart rate) interval difference between leprosy patients and healthy controls. Thirty leprosy patients and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were included in this study. These leprosy patients, aged 41 years on average, suffered from leprosy for an average of 4 years. 55% of these patients had more than 10 skin patches, 66% of them had somatic neuropathy, and 33% of them had cardiac autonomic neuropathy. Electrocardiogram recording from lead II showed that QTc interval was significantly longer in patients with leprosy than in healthy controls (OR: 6, 95% CI: 1.17-30.72, P = 0.03). QTc interval was unrelated to age and duration of disease and it would not be influenced by the type of neuropathies and skin symptoms. QTc results revealed that patients with leprosy had a significantly higher risk for cardiac autonomic neuropathy than healthy controls.","PeriodicalId":8515,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Trials: Nervous System Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Trials: Nervous System Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2468-5577.187081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Most of studies on leprosy mainly focus on its somatic symptoms. There are few reports on evaluation of cardiac autonomic status by QTc interval. We performed a cross-sectional, case-control study to investigate the QTc (QT corrected for heart rate) interval difference between leprosy patients and healthy controls. Thirty leprosy patients and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were included in this study. These leprosy patients, aged 41 years on average, suffered from leprosy for an average of 4 years. 55% of these patients had more than 10 skin patches, 66% of them had somatic neuropathy, and 33% of them had cardiac autonomic neuropathy. Electrocardiogram recording from lead II showed that QTc interval was significantly longer in patients with leprosy than in healthy controls (OR: 6, 95% CI: 1.17-30.72, P = 0.03). QTc interval was unrelated to age and duration of disease and it would not be influenced by the type of neuropathies and skin symptoms. QTc results revealed that patients with leprosy had a significantly higher risk for cardiac autonomic neuropathy than healthy controls.
应用QTc间期评价麻风病患者心脏自主神经状态
对麻风病的研究大多集中在躯体症状上。用QTc间期评价心脏自主神经状态的报道很少。我们进行了一项横断面病例对照研究,以调查麻风病患者和健康对照者的QTc(校正心率的QT)间期差异。本研究包括30名麻风病患者和30名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照。这些麻风病患者平均年龄41岁,患麻风病的平均时间为4年。55%的患者有10个以上的皮肤斑块,66%的患者有躯体神经病变,33%的患者有心脏自主神经病变。II导联心电图记录显示,麻风病患者QTc间期明显长于健康对照组(OR: 6, 95% CI: 1.17-30.72, P = 0.03)。QTc间期与年龄、病程无关,不受神经病变类型和皮肤症状的影响。QTc结果显示,麻风病患者发生心脏自主神经病变的风险明显高于健康对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信