Günümüz Çalışma Rejiminde Uykunun İkircikli Konumu: Kavramsal Bir Tartışma

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
Emir Kurmuş, Çağatay Topal
{"title":"Günümüz Çalışma Rejiminde Uykunun İkircikli Konumu: Kavramsal Bir Tartışma","authors":"Emir Kurmuş, Çağatay Topal","doi":"10.26650/jecs2020-815618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sleep is attracting increasing medical and psychological research interest as well as media interest. This study investigates the socio-economic processes behind this growth in interest. It proposes an analytical framework that examines sleep in the relationships among the body, work, and the rhythms of everyday life within the constraints of today’s capitalist work regime. In this framework, the concept of time pressure is significant for understanding practices and approaches to sleep, as well as the structural processes and contradictions of contemporary capitalism. Having a work life and accelerating one’s social life are the main determinants of time experience. While sleep, which is a very important part of an employee’s life, becomes limited or restricted, it is nevertheless essential for the sake of efficiency and continuing activity in business and daily life. This study investigates the ambivalent position of sleep with reference to Hartmut Rosa’s concept of social acceleration. This ambivalent position is found to be constructed by the trio of acceleration, flexibility, and time pressure, and it is essentially defined by capitalism. ABSTRACT This study proposes a conceptual framework within the discipline of sociology to the problem of sleep, accepted as a natural activity of human beings. Based on Hartmut Rosa’s (2009, 2013) concept of social acceleration, this study focuses on the ambivalent position of sleep, revealed within the tripartite relationship of social acceleration, flexible working regimes, and time pressure. The claim of the study is that this position is determined within the interaction of deceleration and acceleration. Sleep, perhaps the most important deceleration practice in human life, has both preventive and supportive functions in capitalist acceleration. The combination of these two functions, which seem to be in opposition, indi cates the ambivalent position of sleep at the present time. coordination between rhythms and conflicts and contradictions are emphasized. This study proposes a framework that does not ignore the distinctions between the historicity of social time, as conditioned by the mode of production, and the experiences of different social groups in different places (see Col -ley, Henriksson, Niemeyer, & Seddon, 2012). The basic concept used for this purpose is that of social acceleration, as developed by Hartmut Rosa (2009, 2013). Another process related to acceleration, to be discussed over the time theme, is the flexibility of the working regime. This article will primarily ex amine acceleration and flexibility in the context of time pressure. This discussion is undertaken to show that the triad of acceleration, flexibility, and time pressure are the defining elements of today’s capitalism. The article will then seek to make sense of the position of sleep in capitalism for the result of these three processes. Finally, the ambivalent nature of the position of sleep in the interaction of deceleration and acceleration will be analyzed. This study will thus provide a framework that places sleep within processes of acceleration, flexibility, and time pressure, and thus contribute to under standing the ambivalent status of sleep in capitalism in the context of the intertwined relationship be tween deceleration and acceleration.","PeriodicalId":40967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economy Culture and Society","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economy Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/jecs2020-815618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sleep is attracting increasing medical and psychological research interest as well as media interest. This study investigates the socio-economic processes behind this growth in interest. It proposes an analytical framework that examines sleep in the relationships among the body, work, and the rhythms of everyday life within the constraints of today’s capitalist work regime. In this framework, the concept of time pressure is significant for understanding practices and approaches to sleep, as well as the structural processes and contradictions of contemporary capitalism. Having a work life and accelerating one’s social life are the main determinants of time experience. While sleep, which is a very important part of an employee’s life, becomes limited or restricted, it is nevertheless essential for the sake of efficiency and continuing activity in business and daily life. This study investigates the ambivalent position of sleep with reference to Hartmut Rosa’s concept of social acceleration. This ambivalent position is found to be constructed by the trio of acceleration, flexibility, and time pressure, and it is essentially defined by capitalism. ABSTRACT This study proposes a conceptual framework within the discipline of sociology to the problem of sleep, accepted as a natural activity of human beings. Based on Hartmut Rosa’s (2009, 2013) concept of social acceleration, this study focuses on the ambivalent position of sleep, revealed within the tripartite relationship of social acceleration, flexible working regimes, and time pressure. The claim of the study is that this position is determined within the interaction of deceleration and acceleration. Sleep, perhaps the most important deceleration practice in human life, has both preventive and supportive functions in capitalist acceleration. The combination of these two functions, which seem to be in opposition, indi cates the ambivalent position of sleep at the present time. coordination between rhythms and conflicts and contradictions are emphasized. This study proposes a framework that does not ignore the distinctions between the historicity of social time, as conditioned by the mode of production, and the experiences of different social groups in different places (see Col -ley, Henriksson, Niemeyer, & Seddon, 2012). The basic concept used for this purpose is that of social acceleration, as developed by Hartmut Rosa (2009, 2013). Another process related to acceleration, to be discussed over the time theme, is the flexibility of the working regime. This article will primarily ex amine acceleration and flexibility in the context of time pressure. This discussion is undertaken to show that the triad of acceleration, flexibility, and time pressure are the defining elements of today’s capitalism. The article will then seek to make sense of the position of sleep in capitalism for the result of these three processes. Finally, the ambivalent nature of the position of sleep in the interaction of deceleration and acceleration will be analyzed. This study will thus provide a framework that places sleep within processes of acceleration, flexibility, and time pressure, and thus contribute to under standing the ambivalent status of sleep in capitalism in the context of the intertwined relationship be tween deceleration and acceleration.
睡眠正吸引着越来越多的医学和心理学研究兴趣以及媒体的兴趣。本研究调查了这种兴趣增长背后的社会经济过程。它提出了一个分析框架,在当今资本主义工作制度的约束下,研究睡眠在身体、工作和日常生活节奏之间的关系。在这个框架中,时间压力的概念对于理解睡眠的实践和方法,以及当代资本主义的结构过程和矛盾都是重要的。拥有工作生活和加快社交生活是时间体验的主要决定因素。虽然睡眠是员工生活中非常重要的一部分,但它变得有限或受到限制,然而,为了工作效率和日常生活中持续的活动,它是必不可少的。本研究参照哈特穆特·罗莎的社会加速概念,探讨睡眠的矛盾地位。这种矛盾的立场被发现是由加速、灵活性和时间压力这三个因素构成的,它本质上是由资本主义定义的。本研究提出了一个社会学学科的概念框架,以解决睡眠问题,被认为是人类的自然活动。基于Hartmut Rosa(2009, 2013)的社会加速概念,本研究关注睡眠的矛盾地位,揭示了社会加速、灵活的工作制度和时间压力的三方关系。该研究的主张是,这个位置是在减速和加速的相互作用下确定的。睡眠,也许是人类生活中最重要的减速方式,对资本主义的加速既有预防作用,也有支持作用。这两种功能的结合,似乎是对立的,表明了睡眠在目前的矛盾地位。强调节奏与矛盾冲突之间的协调。本研究提出了一个框架,该框架没有忽视社会时间的历史性(由生产方式决定)与不同地方不同社会群体的经验之间的区别(见Col -ley, Henriksson, Niemeyer, & Seddon, 2012)。用于此目的的基本概念是社会加速,由Hartmut Rosa(2009, 2013)开发。将在时间主题上讨论的与加速有关的另一个进程是工作制度的灵活性。本文将主要探讨时间压力下的加速和灵活性。本文的讨论旨在表明,加速、灵活性和时间压力三者是当今资本主义的决定性因素。然后,本文将试图弄清楚睡眠在资本主义中这三个过程的结果所处的位置。最后,将分析在减速和加速的相互作用中睡眠位置的矛盾性质。因此,本研究将提供一个框架,将睡眠置于加速、灵活性和时间压力的过程中,从而有助于理解在减速和加速相互交织的关系背景下,资本主义中睡眠的矛盾状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信