Testing and Refining Measures of Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Smokers and Nonsmokers

Melissa Chapman Haynes, Ann W. St. Claire, R. Boyle, A. Betzner
{"title":"Testing and Refining Measures of Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Smokers and Nonsmokers","authors":"Melissa Chapman Haynes, Ann W. St. Claire, R. Boyle, A. Betzner","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntw315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\nOver the past few decades, tobacco control efforts have made great strides in making smoke-free air the norm; 30 states in the United States have implemented 100% smoke-free laws. Despite this progress, the evolution of the measurement of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure has lagged.\n\n\nMethods\nCognitive testing was used to explore the functioning and limitations of current SHS surveillance items; many items are frequently used for statewide or national surveillance. A total of 20 nonsmokers and 17 smokers participated in a cognitive interview.\n\n\nResults\nOverreporting of SHS was evidenced in our analysis as thirdhand smoke exposure was being included in the assessment of SHS exposure, likely due to the successful implementation of indoor smoking bans. Also asking about locations of SHS exposure outside of work, home, or a personal vehicle is important because these alternative locations were sometimes the only incidence of SHS exposure.\n\n\nConclusions\nSurvey questions about SHS should: (1) reduce the ambiguity in words and phrases of items; (2) measure location of exposure; (3) measure duration of exposure; and (4) consider alternative strategies for asking smokers questions about SHS. Assessing location and duration of exposure can inform decision-makers about future SHS programming and policy work.\n\n\nImplications\nCommonly accepted survey measures of SHS exposure need to be reevaluated to assure that the intended interpretation of them is still accurate given significant policy and social norm change. This paper assesses current SHS surveillance items and provides recommendations for revisions.","PeriodicalId":19355,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine and Tobacco Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"199–205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine and Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction Over the past few decades, tobacco control efforts have made great strides in making smoke-free air the norm; 30 states in the United States have implemented 100% smoke-free laws. Despite this progress, the evolution of the measurement of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure has lagged. Methods Cognitive testing was used to explore the functioning and limitations of current SHS surveillance items; many items are frequently used for statewide or national surveillance. A total of 20 nonsmokers and 17 smokers participated in a cognitive interview. Results Overreporting of SHS was evidenced in our analysis as thirdhand smoke exposure was being included in the assessment of SHS exposure, likely due to the successful implementation of indoor smoking bans. Also asking about locations of SHS exposure outside of work, home, or a personal vehicle is important because these alternative locations were sometimes the only incidence of SHS exposure. Conclusions Survey questions about SHS should: (1) reduce the ambiguity in words and phrases of items; (2) measure location of exposure; (3) measure duration of exposure; and (4) consider alternative strategies for asking smokers questions about SHS. Assessing location and duration of exposure can inform decision-makers about future SHS programming and policy work. Implications Commonly accepted survey measures of SHS exposure need to be reevaluated to assure that the intended interpretation of them is still accurate given significant policy and social norm change. This paper assesses current SHS surveillance items and provides recommendations for revisions.
吸烟者和非吸烟者二手烟暴露的测试和改进措施
在过去的几十年里,烟草控制工作在使无烟空气成为规范方面取得了巨大进展;美国有30个州实施了100%无烟法律。尽管取得了这些进展,二手烟暴露测量的发展却滞后了。方法采用认知测验的方法,探讨现行SHS监测项目的功能和局限性;许多项目经常用于全州或国家监视。共有20名不吸烟者和17名吸烟者参加了认知访谈。结果在我们的分析中,三手烟暴露被纳入了SHS暴露评估,这可能是由于成功实施室内禁烟令。此外,询问工作场所、家庭或个人车辆以外的SHS暴露地点也很重要,因为这些替代地点有时是SHS暴露的唯一发生地点。结论SHS调查问题应:(1)减少题项词语和短语的歧义性;(2)测量暴露位置;(3)测量暴露时间;(4)考虑向吸烟者询问SHS相关问题的替代策略。评估暴露的地点和持续时间可以为决策者提供有关未来SHS规划和政策工作的信息。需要重新评估普遍接受的SHS暴露调查措施,以确保在政策和社会规范发生重大变化的情况下,对这些措施的预期解释仍然是准确的。本文对当前SHS监测项目进行了评估,并提出了修订建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信