台灣工時規範之法規執行度-從法律規範之「應然」到「實然」

Q4 Medicine
蔡奉真
{"title":"台灣工時規範之法規執行度-從法律規範之「應然」到「實然」","authors":"蔡奉真","doi":"10.6288/TJPH2013-32-03-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the average yearly working hours of workers, the Statutory-hour Strictness, the Observance Degree, and the Effective Regulatory Index for working-hours in Taiwan. Methods: The Effective Regulation Index was defined as the average of Statutory-hour Strictness and the Observance Degree. The dataset of the Human Resource Survey from 1978 to 2010 compiled by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan was used in the study. The changes in regulations for working hours in Taiwan were determined. Then the average yearly working hours of workers, the Statutory-hour Strictness, the Observance Degree and the Effective Regulation Index for working hours in Taiwan were calculated. Information from 2004 was further analyzed for comparison with other countries. Results: The average working hours of workers in Taiwan were comparatively high. Before 2000, the average working hours per week were above 46. After 2000, average working hours per week were still above 44, except for 43 hours in 2009. The Statutory-hour Strictness rose from 0 to 4.6 in 2000. The Observance Degree slowly increased from 6.4 in 1978 to 8.64 in 1999; although it dropped to 1.6 in 2000, it remained stable around 5 after 2000. The Effective Regulation Index for working hours in Taiwan was between 2.9 and 4.3 before 2000, but remained between 4.7 and 5.3 in the 21st century. In 2004, the Observance Degree of the working regulations was 5.2, and the Effective Regulation Index was 4.9. Conclusions: The huge gap between regulations and reality in working hours in Taiwan showed the ineffectiveness of working-hours regulation. We suggest increasing workers' awareness of regulations and strengthening enforcement of the working regulations by improving the labor inspection system in Taiwan.","PeriodicalId":34895,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Public Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"220-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6288/TJPH2013-32-03-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the average yearly working hours of workers, the Statutory-hour Strictness, the Observance Degree, and the Effective Regulatory Index for working-hours in Taiwan. Methods: The Effective Regulation Index was defined as the average of Statutory-hour Strictness and the Observance Degree. The dataset of the Human Resource Survey from 1978 to 2010 compiled by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan was used in the study. The changes in regulations for working hours in Taiwan were determined. Then the average yearly working hours of workers, the Statutory-hour Strictness, the Observance Degree and the Effective Regulation Index for working hours in Taiwan were calculated. Information from 2004 was further analyzed for comparison with other countries. Results: The average working hours of workers in Taiwan were comparatively high. Before 2000, the average working hours per week were above 46. After 2000, average working hours per week were still above 44, except for 43 hours in 2009. The Statutory-hour Strictness rose from 0 to 4.6 in 2000. The Observance Degree slowly increased from 6.4 in 1978 to 8.64 in 1999; although it dropped to 1.6 in 2000, it remained stable around 5 after 2000. The Effective Regulation Index for working hours in Taiwan was between 2.9 and 4.3 before 2000, but remained between 4.7 and 5.3 in the 21st century. In 2004, the Observance Degree of the working regulations was 5.2, and the Effective Regulation Index was 4.9. Conclusions: The huge gap between regulations and reality in working hours in Taiwan showed the ineffectiveness of working-hours regulation. We suggest increasing workers' awareness of regulations and strengthening enforcement of the working regulations by improving the labor inspection system in Taiwan.
台湾工时规范之法规执行度-从法律规范之「应然」到「实然」
摘要目的:本研究旨在评估台湾地区劳工年平均工时、法定工时严格程度、遵守程度及有效工时监管指数。方法:将有效监管指数定义为法定小时严格程度与遵守程度的平均值。本研究采用行政院预算会计统计总司编制的1978 - 2010年人力资源调查数据集。台湾工作时间规定的变更已确定。进而计算台湾地区劳工年平均工时、法定工时严格度、遵守程度及工时有效规管指数。2004年的信息进一步分析,以便与其他国家进行比较。结果:台湾工人的平均工作时间较高。2000年以前,平均每周工作时数超过46小时。2000年后,除了2009年的43小时外,平均每周工作时间仍在44小时以上。法定小时严格度从0上升到2000年的4.6。遵守度从1978年的6.4缓慢上升到1999年的8.64;虽然在2000年下降到1.6,但2000年以后一直稳定在5左右。2000年以前,台湾工作时数的有效管制指数在2.9 ~ 4.3之间,进入21世纪后则维持在4.7 ~ 5.3之间。2004年,工作法规的遵守程度为5.2,有效法规指数为4.9。结论:台湾工作时间法规与实际存在巨大差距,说明工作时间法规的有效性不足。我们建议透过改善台湾的劳动监察制度,提高劳工的法规意识,并加强劳动法规的执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Taiwan Journal of Public Health
Taiwan Journal of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信