Improvement of purification process of stevia extract by combination of microfiltration and ultrafiltration

M. Silaen, E. Noor, M. Rahayuningsih
{"title":"Improvement of purification process of stevia extract by combination of microfiltration and ultrafiltration","authors":"M. Silaen, E. Noor, M. Rahayuningsih","doi":"10.22302/iribb.jur.mp.v91i1.521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microfiltration and ultrafiltration are used for the purification process of stevia extract to retain steviosides and remove tannins. The main objective of this study was to obtain the operating conditions for the purification process of stevia extract that resulted in the lowest stevioside rejection and highest tannin rejection. The purification process of stevia extract using microfiltration membrane was carried out at transmembrane pressure (1.20, 1.40, 1.65, 1.80, and 1.90 bar), cross flow velocity (0.04, 0.06, and 0.11 m s-1), and stevioside concentration of feed (7.12, 10.25, 14.03, and 18.47 g L-1). The stevia extract purification process used ultrafiltration membrane at transmembrane pressure (1.20, 1.40, 1.65, 1.80, and 1.90 bar), cross flow velocity (0.06, 0.09, and 0.12 m s-1), and stevioside concentration of feed (4.59 and 10.36 g L-1). The first step purification process was carried out using a microfiltration membrane and the resulting permeate was used as feed for the ultrafiltration process. The second step purification process was carried out using an ultrafiltration membrane. The best operating conditions of the microfiltration process were feed stevioside concentration of 14.03 g L-1 at a transmembrane pressure of 1.90 bar and a cross flow velocity of 0.11 m s-1 with a permeate flux of 82.90 L m-2 h-1. The best operating conditions of the ultrafiltration process used a feed stevioside concentration of 10.36 g L-1 with a permeate flux of 26.51 L m-2 h-1 at a transmembrane pressure of 1.90 bar and a cross flow velocity of 0.12 m s-1. The microfiltration and ultrafiltration processes resulted in total stevioside rejection of 59.52 % and total tannin rejection of 57.99 %.","PeriodicalId":11660,"journal":{"name":"E-Journal Menara Perkebunan","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E-Journal Menara Perkebunan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22302/iribb.jur.mp.v91i1.521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microfiltration and ultrafiltration are used for the purification process of stevia extract to retain steviosides and remove tannins. The main objective of this study was to obtain the operating conditions for the purification process of stevia extract that resulted in the lowest stevioside rejection and highest tannin rejection. The purification process of stevia extract using microfiltration membrane was carried out at transmembrane pressure (1.20, 1.40, 1.65, 1.80, and 1.90 bar), cross flow velocity (0.04, 0.06, and 0.11 m s-1), and stevioside concentration of feed (7.12, 10.25, 14.03, and 18.47 g L-1). The stevia extract purification process used ultrafiltration membrane at transmembrane pressure (1.20, 1.40, 1.65, 1.80, and 1.90 bar), cross flow velocity (0.06, 0.09, and 0.12 m s-1), and stevioside concentration of feed (4.59 and 10.36 g L-1). The first step purification process was carried out using a microfiltration membrane and the resulting permeate was used as feed for the ultrafiltration process. The second step purification process was carried out using an ultrafiltration membrane. The best operating conditions of the microfiltration process were feed stevioside concentration of 14.03 g L-1 at a transmembrane pressure of 1.90 bar and a cross flow velocity of 0.11 m s-1 with a permeate flux of 82.90 L m-2 h-1. The best operating conditions of the ultrafiltration process used a feed stevioside concentration of 10.36 g L-1 with a permeate flux of 26.51 L m-2 h-1 at a transmembrane pressure of 1.90 bar and a cross flow velocity of 0.12 m s-1. The microfiltration and ultrafiltration processes resulted in total stevioside rejection of 59.52 % and total tannin rejection of 57.99 %.
微滤与超滤联合提纯甜菊叶提取物的工艺改进
采用微滤和超滤两种方法对甜叶菊提取物进行纯化,以保留甜叶菊苷,去除单宁。本研究的主要目的是获得甜叶菊提取物的纯化工艺的操作条件,使甜叶菊苷排斥率最低,单宁排斥率最高。在跨膜压力(1.20、1.40、1.65、1.80和1.90 bar)、横向流速(0.04、0.06和0.11 m s-1)和饲料中甜菊苷浓度(7.12、10.25、14.03和18.47 g L-1)的条件下,采用微滤膜对甜菊糖提取物进行纯化。甜叶菊提取物的纯化工艺采用超滤膜,跨膜压力分别为1.20、1.40、1.65、1.80和1.90 bar,交叉流速分别为0.06、0.09和0.12 m s-1,饲料中甜叶菊苷浓度分别为4.59和10.36 g L-1。采用微滤膜进行第一步净化,所得的渗透液作为超滤过程的进料。采用超滤膜进行第二步净化。微滤工艺的最佳操作条件为:入料浓度为14.03 g L-1,跨膜压力为1.90 bar,横流速度为0.11 m s-1,渗透通量为82.90 L m-2 h-1。超滤工艺的最佳操作条件为进料甜菊苷浓度为10.36 g L-1,渗透通量为26.51 L m-2 h-1,跨膜压力为1.90 bar,横流速度为0.12 m s-1。微滤和超滤工艺对甜菊苷的总去除率为59.52%,对单宁的总去除率为57.99%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信