Hardness as an indicator of material strength: a critical review

IF 8.1 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Giuseppe Pintaude
{"title":"Hardness as an indicator of material strength: a critical review","authors":"Giuseppe Pintaude","doi":"10.1080/10408436.2022.2085659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Hardness is a powerful property to evaluate the deformation behavior of materials. It serves as confident quality control for several processes, especially in the heat treatment of metals. With the advent of depth-sensing indentation, this technique embraces the determination of other mechanical properties. As proof, recognized standards are available to guide the evaluation of Young’s modulus using instrumented indentation. However, there are continuous efforts to describe the strength using hardness apparatus. This critical review aims to compile all ways of correlation between hardness and uniaxial strength. This relationship is usually addressed by a single value, called constraint factor, vastly recognized in metals as approximately 3. From a theoretical point of view, this value works well for materials with rigid-plastic behavior, where hardening effects can be discharged. Divergent variations presented herein show difficulties in incorporating the effect of plastic properties on the constraint factor determination. In the same way, the empirical determinations did not consider the differences in hardening exponents, putting in the same statistical analysis diverse microstructures. A specific section discusses the constraint factor for nonmetallic materials. There are critical doubts for determining strength from hardness values in this case. The existence of several approaches to estimate the constraint factor in brittle materials did not assure yet a unique value for the same material, which put in evidence the lack of a robust physical basis to understand the plastic deformation under indentation. Future trends are indicated along with these observations to become practical the recent developments that have allied hardness and strength. The most important aspect is to combine adequately the experimental and simulation approaches, which can be supported by an analysis of residual imprints of hardness and finite element model.","PeriodicalId":55203,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":"623 - 641"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2022.2085659","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract Hardness is a powerful property to evaluate the deformation behavior of materials. It serves as confident quality control for several processes, especially in the heat treatment of metals. With the advent of depth-sensing indentation, this technique embraces the determination of other mechanical properties. As proof, recognized standards are available to guide the evaluation of Young’s modulus using instrumented indentation. However, there are continuous efforts to describe the strength using hardness apparatus. This critical review aims to compile all ways of correlation between hardness and uniaxial strength. This relationship is usually addressed by a single value, called constraint factor, vastly recognized in metals as approximately 3. From a theoretical point of view, this value works well for materials with rigid-plastic behavior, where hardening effects can be discharged. Divergent variations presented herein show difficulties in incorporating the effect of plastic properties on the constraint factor determination. In the same way, the empirical determinations did not consider the differences in hardening exponents, putting in the same statistical analysis diverse microstructures. A specific section discusses the constraint factor for nonmetallic materials. There are critical doubts for determining strength from hardness values in this case. The existence of several approaches to estimate the constraint factor in brittle materials did not assure yet a unique value for the same material, which put in evidence the lack of a robust physical basis to understand the plastic deformation under indentation. Future trends are indicated along with these observations to become practical the recent developments that have allied hardness and strength. The most important aspect is to combine adequately the experimental and simulation approaches, which can be supported by an analysis of residual imprints of hardness and finite element model.
硬度作为材料强度的一个指标:一个重要的评论
硬度是评价材料变形性能的重要指标。它可以作为几个过程的可靠质量控制,特别是在金属热处理中。随着深度感测压痕技术的出现,该技术包含了其他机械性能的测定。作为证明,公认的标准可用于指导使用仪器压痕杨氏模量的评估。然而,人们一直在努力用硬度仪来描述强度。这篇重要的评论旨在汇编硬度和单轴强度之间的所有相关方法。这种关系通常用一个单独的值来表示,称为约束因子,在金属界普遍认为约为3。从理论角度来看,该值适用于具有刚塑性行为的材料,其中硬化效应可以释放。本文提出的不同的变化表明,难以将塑性性能的影响纳入约束因素的确定。以同样的方式,经验测定没有考虑硬化指数的差异,在相同的统计分析中放入不同的微观结构。一个特定的部分讨论了非金属材料的约束因素。在这种情况下,从硬度值来确定强度存在严重的疑问。估计脆性材料约束因子的几种方法的存在并不能保证同一材料的唯一值,这表明缺乏可靠的物理基础来理解压痕下的塑性变形。随着这些观察结果的出现,表明了硬度和强度相关的最新发展成为实际的未来趋势。最重要的是将实验方法和仿真方法充分结合起来,这可以通过硬度残余压痕分析和有限元模型来支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences covers a wide range of topics including solid state materials properties, processing, and applications. The journal provides insights into the latest developments and understandings in these areas, with an emphasis on new and emerging theoretical and experimental topics. It encompasses disciplines such as condensed matter physics, physical chemistry, materials science, and electrical, chemical, and mechanical engineering. Additionally, cross-disciplinary engineering and science specialties are included in the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信