Acknowledging patient heterogeneity in colorectal cancer screening: An example from Norway

Mathyn Vervaart, E. Burger, E. Aas
{"title":"Acknowledging patient heterogeneity in colorectal cancer screening: An example from Norway","authors":"Mathyn Vervaart, E. Burger, E. Aas","doi":"10.5617/NJHE.4881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Different sources of patient heterogeneity or personal characteristics may contribute to differential cost-effectiveness profiles of national screening programs for colorectal cancer (CRC). To motivate the use of subgroup analyses when individual level data are unavailable, we provide a stylized example of the potential economic value of capturing patient heterogeneity in CRC screening. We developed a Markov model to capture the impacts of patient heterogeneity on the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening involving once-only sigmoidoscopy compared to no screening. We simulated cohorts of Norwegian men, women, and six comorbidity subgroups that differentially influenced the relative treatment effect, the risks of developing CRC, dying from CRC, dying from background mortality or screening-related adverse events and baseline quality of life. We calculated the discounted (4%) incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, and the net monetary benefit (NMB) gained by stratification, from a societal perspective. Screening in men was cost-effective at any threshold value, while screening in women only provides good value for money from threshold values of €50,000 per QALY gained and above. Comorbidities unrelated to CRC development yielded generally less attractive cost-effectiveness ratios (i.e., increased the ICER), while related comorbidities improved the cost-effectiveness profiles of screening for CRC. A stratified policy that accounts for different screening outcomes between men and women could potentially improve the value of screening by €5.8 million annually. Accounting for patient heterogeneity in CRC screening will likely improve the value of screening strategies, as a single screening approach for the entire population can result in inefficient use of resources.Published: Online December 2018.","PeriodicalId":30931,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Health Economics","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5617/NJHE.4881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Different sources of patient heterogeneity or personal characteristics may contribute to differential cost-effectiveness profiles of national screening programs for colorectal cancer (CRC). To motivate the use of subgroup analyses when individual level data are unavailable, we provide a stylized example of the potential economic value of capturing patient heterogeneity in CRC screening. We developed a Markov model to capture the impacts of patient heterogeneity on the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening involving once-only sigmoidoscopy compared to no screening. We simulated cohorts of Norwegian men, women, and six comorbidity subgroups that differentially influenced the relative treatment effect, the risks of developing CRC, dying from CRC, dying from background mortality or screening-related adverse events and baseline quality of life. We calculated the discounted (4%) incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, and the net monetary benefit (NMB) gained by stratification, from a societal perspective. Screening in men was cost-effective at any threshold value, while screening in women only provides good value for money from threshold values of €50,000 per QALY gained and above. Comorbidities unrelated to CRC development yielded generally less attractive cost-effectiveness ratios (i.e., increased the ICER), while related comorbidities improved the cost-effectiveness profiles of screening for CRC. A stratified policy that accounts for different screening outcomes between men and women could potentially improve the value of screening by €5.8 million annually. Accounting for patient heterogeneity in CRC screening will likely improve the value of screening strategies, as a single screening approach for the entire population can result in inefficient use of resources.Published: Online December 2018.
承认结直肠癌筛查中的患者异质性:来自挪威的一个例子
摘要:不同来源的患者异质性或个人特征可能导致结直肠癌(CRC)国家筛查计划的成本效益差异。当个体水平数据不可用时,为了激励亚组分析的使用,我们提供了一个在CRC筛查中捕获患者异质性的潜在经济价值的规范化示例。我们开发了一个马尔可夫模型来捕获的影响患者的异质性CRC筛查的成本效益涉及曾经只有乙状结肠镜检查相比,没有筛选。我们模拟群挪威男人,女人,和六个疾病子组,差异相对治疗效果的影响,发展中CRC的风险死于CRC,死于背景死亡率或screening-related不良事件和基线的生活质量。我们从社会角度计算了贴现(4%)增量成本-效果比(ICER),定义为每个质量调整生命年(QALY)获得的成本,以及分层获得的净货币效益(NMB)。男性筛查在任何阈值下都具有成本效益,而女性筛查只有在获得的每QALY 50,000欧元及以上的阈值下才能提供良好的物有所值。与结直肠癌发展无关的合并症通常产生的成本-效果比不太吸引人(即,ICER增加),而相关合并症改善了结直肠癌筛查的成本-效果概况。分层政策占男女不同筛查结果可能提高筛查的价值€580万每年。占病人CRC筛查的异质性可能会提高筛查策略的价值,作为一个筛选方法对整个人口会导致资源利用效率低。出版日期:2018年12月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
51 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信