Comparison of Thought-Action Fusion in Peoples with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Major Depression Disorder

Ghamari Kivi Hossein, Mohammadipour rik Ne’mat, Mikaeili Niloofar
{"title":"Comparison of Thought-Action Fusion in Peoples with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Major Depression Disorder","authors":"Ghamari Kivi Hossein, Mohammadipour rik Ne’mat, Mikaeili Niloofar","doi":"10.5923/J.IJAP.20120205.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thought-Action Fusion (TAF) refers to the tendency to assume incorrect casual relationship between ones own thoughts and external reality, in witch, thoughts and actions are treated as equivalents. This construct is presence to development and maintenance of many psychological d isorders. The Aim o f p resent study is comparison TAF and its levels include moral and likelihood TAF, among Obsessive-Co mpulsive Disorder (OCD),Major Depression and normal groups. Thus three groups included 150 persons were selected by available sampling method in private and governmental psychiatric centers in Ardabil city, and then, they responded to Beck Depression Inventory, Padua Inventory and TAF scale. Data was analyzed using MANOVA. Results revealed that, there is significant differences between OCD and Major Depression groups with normal group in mo ral TAF(p <./.1), and likelihood TAF(p<./.1), but, there is no significant differences between OCD group and Major Depression group in moral TAF and likelihood TAF. The results indicated that, moral and likelihood TAF had equal levels in OCD and Major Depression Disorder, thus they could not differentiate OCD fro m Major Depression Disorder.","PeriodicalId":91505,"journal":{"name":"International journal of applied psychology","volume":"16 1","pages":"77-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of applied psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5923/J.IJAP.20120205.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Thought-Action Fusion (TAF) refers to the tendency to assume incorrect casual relationship between ones own thoughts and external reality, in witch, thoughts and actions are treated as equivalents. This construct is presence to development and maintenance of many psychological d isorders. The Aim o f p resent study is comparison TAF and its levels include moral and likelihood TAF, among Obsessive-Co mpulsive Disorder (OCD),Major Depression and normal groups. Thus three groups included 150 persons were selected by available sampling method in private and governmental psychiatric centers in Ardabil city, and then, they responded to Beck Depression Inventory, Padua Inventory and TAF scale. Data was analyzed using MANOVA. Results revealed that, there is significant differences between OCD and Major Depression groups with normal group in mo ral TAF(p <./.1), and likelihood TAF(p<./.1), but, there is no significant differences between OCD group and Major Depression group in moral TAF and likelihood TAF. The results indicated that, moral and likelihood TAF had equal levels in OCD and Major Depression Disorder, thus they could not differentiate OCD fro m Major Depression Disorder.
强迫症与重度抑郁症患者思想-行动融合的比较
思想-行动融合(Thought-Action Fusion, TAF)是指倾向于认为自己的思想与外部现实之间存在不正确的偶然关系,即认为思想和行动是等同的。这种结构存在于许多心理障碍的发展和维持中。本研究的目的是比较强迫症(OCD)、重度抑郁症和正常人群的TAF及其水平,包括道德TAF和可能性TAF。采用有效抽样方法,在阿达比尔市私立和公立精神病学中心抽取3组150人,分别进行Beck抑郁量表、Padua量表和TAF量表的问卷调查。数据分析采用方差分析。结果显示,强迫症组和重度抑郁组在道德TAF和似然TAF方面与正常组有显著差异(p<./ 1),而强迫症组和重度抑郁组在道德TAF和似然TAF方面无显著差异(p<./ 1)。结果表明,道德TAF和似然TAF在强迫症和重度抑郁症中的水平相同,因此不能区分强迫症和重度抑郁症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信