Extra-Articular Proximal and Distal Metaphyseal Tibial Fracture Fixation by Intramedullary Expert Nail and Locking Plate: A Prospective Study

Md Mizanur Rahman Chowdhury, Md. Mahfuzur Rahman, Md. Abdur Rahman, Jabed Jahangir, Mohammad Qausarul Matin
{"title":"Extra-Articular Proximal and Distal Metaphyseal Tibial Fracture Fixation by Intramedullary Expert Nail and Locking Plate: A Prospective Study","authors":"Md Mizanur Rahman Chowdhury, Md. Mahfuzur Rahman, Md. Abdur Rahman, Jabed Jahangir, Mohammad Qausarul Matin","doi":"10.3329/jcmcta.v32i1.66544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Extra-articular proximal and distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia pose a significant challenge to the surgeons. Debate continues regarding choice of fixation devices. Evaluate these fractures fixation with intramedullary expert tibial nail and extramedullary locking plate and screws. \nMaterials and methods: This is a prospective interventional study which had been conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chattogram from July, 2018 to June, 2019. Total 60 cases (30 cases in each group) with proximal and distal metaphyseal tibial fractures (AO/OTA 41A2 to A3 and 43A1 to A3) were taken. Functional assessment was done atleast 6th month of surgery using Tegner Lysholm knee scoring scale and Kaikkonen ankle scale. \nResults: According to assessment scale, excellent outcome was observed in 20 (66.7%) patients, good in 05 (16.7%), fair in 03 (9.9%) and poor in 2 (6.7%) patients in ETN group while in LPS group, 18 (60%) patients were excellent, 05 (16.7%) good, 04 (14.3%) fair and 03 (9.9%) patients were poor. Difference in functional outcome in both the groups was statistically non-significant. \nConclusions: There was no significant difference statistically in functional outcome of patients treated with intramedullary and extramedullary fixation method. \nJCMCTA 2021 ; 32 (1) : 59-64","PeriodicalId":93458,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers' Association","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jcmcta.v32i1.66544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extra-articular proximal and distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia pose a significant challenge to the surgeons. Debate continues regarding choice of fixation devices. Evaluate these fractures fixation with intramedullary expert tibial nail and extramedullary locking plate and screws. Materials and methods: This is a prospective interventional study which had been conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chattogram from July, 2018 to June, 2019. Total 60 cases (30 cases in each group) with proximal and distal metaphyseal tibial fractures (AO/OTA 41A2 to A3 and 43A1 to A3) were taken. Functional assessment was done atleast 6th month of surgery using Tegner Lysholm knee scoring scale and Kaikkonen ankle scale. Results: According to assessment scale, excellent outcome was observed in 20 (66.7%) patients, good in 05 (16.7%), fair in 03 (9.9%) and poor in 2 (6.7%) patients in ETN group while in LPS group, 18 (60%) patients were excellent, 05 (16.7%) good, 04 (14.3%) fair and 03 (9.9%) patients were poor. Difference in functional outcome in both the groups was statistically non-significant. Conclusions: There was no significant difference statistically in functional outcome of patients treated with intramedullary and extramedullary fixation method. JCMCTA 2021 ; 32 (1) : 59-64
髓内专家钉加锁定钢板固定胫骨干骺端骨折关节外近端和远端:一项前瞻性研究
背景:胫骨关节外近端和远端干骺端骨折是外科医生面临的一个重大挑战。关于固定装置选择的争论仍在继续。评估这些骨折采用髓内专家胫骨钉和髓外锁定钢板及螺钉固定。材料与方法:本研究是一项前瞻性介入研究,于2018年7月至2019年6月在Chattogram吉大港医学院附属医院骨科与创伤科进行。共收治胫骨干骺端骨折(AO/OTA 41A2 ~ A3和43A1 ~ A3)近端和远端骨折60例(每组30例)。术后至少6个月使用Tegner Lysholm膝关节评分量表和Kaikkonen踝关节评分量表进行功能评估。结果:根据评估量表,ETN组预后为优20例(66.7%),良05例(16.7%),一般03例(9.9%),差2例(6.7%);LPS组预后为优18例(60%),良05例(16.7%),一般04例(14.3%),差03例(9.9%)。两组功能结果差异无统计学意义。结论:髓内固定与髓外固定治疗患者的功能结局无统计学差异。Jcmcta 2021;32 (1): 59-64
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信