Statement of Retraction: The verdict is in: how did they decide? Using drivers' self-reported data to understand officers' decision making during traffic stop encounters

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
C. Howley
{"title":"Statement of Retraction: The verdict is in: how did they decide? Using drivers' self-reported data to understand officers' decision making during traffic stop encounters","authors":"C. Howley","doi":"10.1080/1068316x.2021.2018124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since publication, the Authors discovered two errors in the article. Specifically, (1) the sample size was mistakenly under-reported. Instead of 5283, the authors reported 5268. (2) The effect for one of the variables was erroneously reported. The direction of the effect for one variable was reported as a positive effect, when it was a negative effect. This led to the suggestion that verbal assault on officers increases chances of receiving an outcome instead of reducing such likelihood. The errors directly impact the validity of the reported results and conclusions.","PeriodicalId":47845,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Crime & Law","volume":"14 1","pages":"1044 - 1044"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Crime & Law","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2021.2018124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since publication, the Authors discovered two errors in the article. Specifically, (1) the sample size was mistakenly under-reported. Instead of 5283, the authors reported 5268. (2) The effect for one of the variables was erroneously reported. The direction of the effect for one variable was reported as a positive effect, when it was a negative effect. This led to the suggestion that verbal assault on officers increases chances of receiving an outcome instead of reducing such likelihood. The errors directly impact the validity of the reported results and conclusions.
撤回声明:结果出来了,他们是怎么决定的?使用司机自我报告的数据来了解警察在交通停车遭遇时的决策
文章发表后,作者发现了两个错误。具体来说,(1)样本量被错误地少报。作者报告的不是5283,而是5268。(2)其中一个变量的影响被错误地报告了。当一个变量的作用方向是负作用时,它被报告为正作用。这导致了对警官的言语攻击增加了获得结果的机会,而不是减少了这种可能性。这些误差直接影响报告结果和结论的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: This journal promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to crime, criminal and civil law, and the influence of law on behavior. The content includes the aetiology of criminal behavior and studies of different offender groups; crime detection, for example, interrogation and witness testimony; courtroom studies in areas such as jury behavior, decision making, divorce and custody, and expert testimony; behavior of litigants, lawyers, judges, and court officers, both in and outside the courtroom; issues of offender management including prisons, probation, and rehabilitation initiatives; and studies of public, including the victim, reactions to crime and the legal process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信