Faculty’s barriers to mentoring freshmen within an interinstitutional context: applying the theory of planned behavior

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Johanne Huart, L. Leduc, Nathanaël Laurent, P. Detroz, Natacha Martynow, Célia Charbaut, Déborah Malengrez, V. Vierset, I. Lambert, Laura Gabriel, Anne-Catherine Vieujean, Fabienne Compère, D. Verpoorten
{"title":"Faculty’s barriers to mentoring freshmen within an interinstitutional context: applying the theory of planned behavior","authors":"Johanne Huart, L. Leduc, Nathanaël Laurent, P. Detroz, Natacha Martynow, Célia Charbaut, Déborah Malengrez, V. Vierset, I. Lambert, Laura Gabriel, Anne-Catherine Vieujean, Fabienne Compère, D. Verpoorten","doi":"10.1080/13611267.2022.2127255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In order to investigate faculties’ barriers to mentoring freshmen within an interinstitutional (and possibly reluctant) context, a questionnaire survey (N = 390), based on the Theory of Planned Behavior, was conducted prior to the inception of a wide mentoring program involving nine Belgian higher education institutions. Stepwise multiple regressions pinpointed the predictors of faculty’s intention to participate in the program and their underlying beliefs. Results reveal that the obstacles commonly attributed to mentoring in the literature do not necessarily come out of this empirical approach and, conversely, that normative factors, underrepresented in research, can play an important role in resistance to or acceptance of mentoring. These findings contribute to a better knowledge of how likely freshmen instructors are to become involved in a mentoring program. It also has practical applications in helping to anticipate possible difficulties in implementing such a program. Lastly, the paper highlights practical implications for the Belgian consortium.","PeriodicalId":46613,"journal":{"name":"MENTORING & TUTORING","volume":"9 1","pages":"503 - 523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MENTORING & TUTORING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2022.2127255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT In order to investigate faculties’ barriers to mentoring freshmen within an interinstitutional (and possibly reluctant) context, a questionnaire survey (N = 390), based on the Theory of Planned Behavior, was conducted prior to the inception of a wide mentoring program involving nine Belgian higher education institutions. Stepwise multiple regressions pinpointed the predictors of faculty’s intention to participate in the program and their underlying beliefs. Results reveal that the obstacles commonly attributed to mentoring in the literature do not necessarily come out of this empirical approach and, conversely, that normative factors, underrepresented in research, can play an important role in resistance to or acceptance of mentoring. These findings contribute to a better knowledge of how likely freshmen instructors are to become involved in a mentoring program. It also has practical applications in helping to anticipate possible difficulties in implementing such a program. Lastly, the paper highlights practical implications for the Belgian consortium.
教师在跨机构背景下指导新生的障碍:计划行为理论的应用
为了调查教师在跨机构(可能是不情愿的)背景下指导新生的障碍,在比利时九所高等教育机构开展广泛的指导计划之前,基于计划行为理论进行了一项问卷调查(N = 390)。逐步多元回归精确地指出了教师参与该计划的意图及其潜在信念的预测因素。结果表明,文献中通常归因于指导的障碍并不一定来自这种实证方法,相反,规范性因素在研究中未被充分代表,可以在抵制或接受指导方面发挥重要作用。这些发现有助于更好地了解新生导师参与辅导计划的可能性。它在帮助预测实施这一计划可能遇到的困难方面也有实际应用。最后,本文强调了对比利时财团的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MENTORING & TUTORING
MENTORING & TUTORING EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信