The forms and meanings of grammatical markers support efficient communication

Francis Mollica, Geoff Bacon, Noga Zaslavsky, Yang Xu, T. Regier, Charles Kemp
{"title":"The forms and meanings of grammatical markers support efficient communication","authors":"Francis Mollica, Geoff Bacon, Noga Zaslavsky, Yang Xu, T. Regier, Charles Kemp","doi":"10.17605/OSF.IO/S5B7H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significance Grammatical marking of features such as number, tense, and evidentiality varies widely across languages. Despite this variation, we show that grammatical markers support efficient information transfer from speakers to listeners. We apply a formal model of communication to data from dozens of languages and find that grammatical marking achieves a near-optimal balance between maximizing informativeness and minimizing code lengths. Our approach shows how general information-theoretic principles can capture variation in both form and meaning across languages. Functionalist accounts of language suggest that forms are paired with meanings in ways that support efficient communication. Previous work on grammatical marking suggests that word forms have lengths that enable efficient production, and work on the semantic typology of the lexicon suggests that word meanings represent efficient partitions of semantic space. Here we establish a theoretical link between these two lines of work and present an information-theoretic analysis that captures how communicative pressures influence both form and meaning. We apply our approach to the grammatical features of number, tense, and evidentiality and show that the approach explains both which systems of feature values are attested across languages and the relative lengths of the forms for those feature values. Our approach shows that general information-theoretic principles can capture variation in both form and meaning across languages.","PeriodicalId":20595,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/S5B7H","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Significance Grammatical marking of features such as number, tense, and evidentiality varies widely across languages. Despite this variation, we show that grammatical markers support efficient information transfer from speakers to listeners. We apply a formal model of communication to data from dozens of languages and find that grammatical marking achieves a near-optimal balance between maximizing informativeness and minimizing code lengths. Our approach shows how general information-theoretic principles can capture variation in both form and meaning across languages. Functionalist accounts of language suggest that forms are paired with meanings in ways that support efficient communication. Previous work on grammatical marking suggests that word forms have lengths that enable efficient production, and work on the semantic typology of the lexicon suggests that word meanings represent efficient partitions of semantic space. Here we establish a theoretical link between these two lines of work and present an information-theoretic analysis that captures how communicative pressures influence both form and meaning. We apply our approach to the grammatical features of number, tense, and evidentiality and show that the approach explains both which systems of feature values are attested across languages and the relative lengths of the forms for those feature values. Our approach shows that general information-theoretic principles can capture variation in both form and meaning across languages.
语法标记的形式和意义支持有效的交际
意义在不同的语言中,数字、时态和证据性等特征的语法标记差别很大。尽管存在这种差异,但我们表明语法标记支持从说话者到听者的有效信息传递。我们将正式的通信模型应用于来自数十种语言的数据,发现语法标记在最大化信息和最小化代码长度之间实现了近乎最佳的平衡。我们的方法展示了一般的信息论原理是如何捕捉语言之间形式和意义上的变化的。功能主义语言理论认为,形式与意义的结合有助于有效的交流。先前对语法标记的研究表明,词形的长度可以有效地生成,而对词典的语义类型学的研究表明,词义代表了语义空间的有效划分。在这里,我们建立了这两种工作之间的理论联系,并提出了一种信息理论分析,以捕捉交际压力如何影响形式和意义。我们将我们的方法应用于数字、时态和证据性的语法特征,并表明该方法解释了跨语言证明的特征值系统以及这些特征值的形式的相对长度。我们的方法表明,一般的信息理论原理可以捕捉语言之间形式和意义的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信