Prospective Validation of Edinburgh Dysphagia Score as a Triaging Tool beyond the COVID-19 Era

GastroHep Pub Date : 2022-03-12 DOI:10.1155/2022/6952469
H. Walton, D. McAvoy, R. Kalla, N. Mcavoy, N. Church, I. Penman, A. Williams, Kenneth Trimble, G. Masterton, J. Plevris, On behalf of EGAR (Edinburgh GI Audit Research) Co
{"title":"Prospective Validation of Edinburgh Dysphagia Score as a Triaging Tool beyond the COVID-19 Era","authors":"H. Walton, D. McAvoy, R. Kalla, N. Mcavoy, N. Church, I. Penman, A. Williams, Kenneth Trimble, G. Masterton, J. Plevris, On behalf of EGAR (Edinburgh GI Audit Research) Co","doi":"10.1155/2022/6952469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Edinburgh Dysphagia Score (EDS) was previously developed to identify patients referred to secondary care with dysphagia, who were most likely to have oesophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to use the EDS prospectively during the COVID pandemic to risk stratify patients to either urgent or routine investigation of dysphagia. Between 1st April and 1st July 2020, 283 patients were referred to NHS Lothian with dysphagia. An EDS score was calculated utilizing information in the GP referral letter or information gained in a “HOT clinic.” Patients with a \n \n score\n ≥\n 3.5\n \n were prioritized for investigation under the “urgent suspicion of cancer” pathway. 243 patients underwent investigations. 18 patients were diagnosed with oesophageal cancer, all of whom had an \n \n EDS\n ≥\n 3.5\n \n (range 4-10). Approximately one third of patients with dysphagia had a score of <3.5. Using this cut-off, sensitivity was 100% and negative predictive value 100%. This study shows that the EDS can be used prospectively when triaging patients referred to secondary care with dysphagia. The high negative predictive value using the EDS means that patients who have an \n \n EDS\n <\n 3.5\n \n can be downgraded to a routine waiting list without leading to delays in diagnosing oesophageal malignancy. This will enable faster investigations for patients who remain on the “urgent suspicion of cancer” waiting list. In the age of COVID-19, with increasingly long waiting lists, the EDS is a useful scoring system to identify patients with the greatest need for urgent endoscopy.","PeriodicalId":12480,"journal":{"name":"GastroHep","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GastroHep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6952469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Edinburgh Dysphagia Score (EDS) was previously developed to identify patients referred to secondary care with dysphagia, who were most likely to have oesophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to use the EDS prospectively during the COVID pandemic to risk stratify patients to either urgent or routine investigation of dysphagia. Between 1st April and 1st July 2020, 283 patients were referred to NHS Lothian with dysphagia. An EDS score was calculated utilizing information in the GP referral letter or information gained in a “HOT clinic.” Patients with a score ≥ 3.5 were prioritized for investigation under the “urgent suspicion of cancer” pathway. 243 patients underwent investigations. 18 patients were diagnosed with oesophageal cancer, all of whom had an EDS ≥ 3.5 (range 4-10). Approximately one third of patients with dysphagia had a score of <3.5. Using this cut-off, sensitivity was 100% and negative predictive value 100%. This study shows that the EDS can be used prospectively when triaging patients referred to secondary care with dysphagia. The high negative predictive value using the EDS means that patients who have an EDS < 3.5 can be downgraded to a routine waiting list without leading to delays in diagnosing oesophageal malignancy. This will enable faster investigations for patients who remain on the “urgent suspicion of cancer” waiting list. In the age of COVID-19, with increasingly long waiting lists, the EDS is a useful scoring system to identify patients with the greatest need for urgent endoscopy.
爱丁堡吞咽困难评分作为新冠肺炎时代后的分诊工具的前瞻性验证
爱丁堡吞咽困难评分(EDS)是先前开发的,用于识别因吞咽困难而转诊至二级护理的患者,这些患者最有可能患有食管癌。本研究的目的是在COVID大流行期间前瞻性地使用EDS对患者进行风险分层,以便对吞咽困难进行紧急或常规调查。在2020年4月1日至7月1日期间,283名吞咽困难患者被转介到洛锡安NHS。EDS评分是利用全科医生推荐信中的信息或在“HOT诊所”获得的信息来计算的。在“急疑癌”途径下,评分≥3.5分的患者优先接受调查。243例患者接受了调查。18例患者被诊断为食管癌,所有患者的EDS≥3.5(范围4-10)。大约三分之一的吞咽困难患者得分<3.5。使用此截止值,灵敏度为100%,阴性预测值为100%。本研究表明,EDS可用于鉴别二级护理的吞咽困难患者。使用EDS的高阴性预测值意味着EDS < 3.5的患者可以降级到常规等候名单,而不会导致诊断食管恶性肿瘤的延误。这将使那些仍在“紧急怀疑癌症”等待名单上的患者能够更快地进行调查。在COVID-19时代,等待名单越来越长,EDS是一个有用的评分系统,可以识别最需要紧急内窥镜检查的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信