Constructing constructivism in management accounting education: reflections from a teaching cycle with innovative learning elements

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
K. Jayasinghe
{"title":"Constructing constructivism in management accounting education: reflections from a teaching cycle with innovative learning elements","authors":"K. Jayasinghe","doi":"10.1108/QRAM-05-2020-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study addresses the possibility of integrating some elements of the ‘radical constructivist’ approach to management accounting teaching. It answers the following two questions: to what extent should management accounting educators construct a ‘radical constructivist’ foundation to guide active learning? and in which ways can management accounting educators use qualitative methods to facilitate ‘radical constructivist’ education? The study uses a teaching cycle that implements innovative learning elements, e.g. learning from ordinary people, designed following the principles of ‘radical constructivism’, to engage students with ‘externalities’ at the center of their knowledge construction. It adopts an ethnographic approach comprising interviews and participant observation for the data collection, followed by the application of qualitative content and narrative analysis of the data. The study findings and reflections illustrate that the majority of students respond positively to radical constructivist learning if the educators can develop an innovative problem-solving and authentic environment that is close to their real lives. The radical constructivist teaching cycle discussed in this study has challenged the mind-sets of the management accounting students since it altered the traditional objectivist academic learning approaches that students were familiar with. Its use of qualitative methods facilitated active learning. Student feedback was sought as part of the qualitative design, which provided a constructive mechanism for the students and educators to learn and unlearn from their mistakes. This process enriched the understanding of learners (students) as well as educators of successful engagement in radical constructivist management accounting education and provides a base upon which to design future teaching cycles. The paper provides proof of the ability of accounting educators, as change-agents, to apply radical constructivist epistemology combined with multiple qualitative research methods by creating new constructive learning structures and cultures associated with innovative deep-learning tasks in management accounting education.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-05-2020-0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study addresses the possibility of integrating some elements of the ‘radical constructivist’ approach to management accounting teaching. It answers the following two questions: to what extent should management accounting educators construct a ‘radical constructivist’ foundation to guide active learning? and in which ways can management accounting educators use qualitative methods to facilitate ‘radical constructivist’ education? The study uses a teaching cycle that implements innovative learning elements, e.g. learning from ordinary people, designed following the principles of ‘radical constructivism’, to engage students with ‘externalities’ at the center of their knowledge construction. It adopts an ethnographic approach comprising interviews and participant observation for the data collection, followed by the application of qualitative content and narrative analysis of the data. The study findings and reflections illustrate that the majority of students respond positively to radical constructivist learning if the educators can develop an innovative problem-solving and authentic environment that is close to their real lives. The radical constructivist teaching cycle discussed in this study has challenged the mind-sets of the management accounting students since it altered the traditional objectivist academic learning approaches that students were familiar with. Its use of qualitative methods facilitated active learning. Student feedback was sought as part of the qualitative design, which provided a constructive mechanism for the students and educators to learn and unlearn from their mistakes. This process enriched the understanding of learners (students) as well as educators of successful engagement in radical constructivist management accounting education and provides a base upon which to design future teaching cycles. The paper provides proof of the ability of accounting educators, as change-agents, to apply radical constructivist epistemology combined with multiple qualitative research methods by creating new constructive learning structures and cultures associated with innovative deep-learning tasks in management accounting education.
在管理会计教育中建构建构主义:一个具有创新学习要素的教学周期的思考
该研究解决了将“激进建构主义”方法的某些元素整合到管理会计教学中的可能性。它回答了以下两个问题:管理会计教育者应该在多大程度上构建一个“激进建构主义”的基础来指导主动学习?管理会计教育者在哪些方面可以使用定性方法来促进“激进建构主义”教育?该研究采用了一个教学周期,实施了创新的学习元素,例如向普通人学习,遵循“激进建构主义”的原则,使学生在知识建构的中心参与“外部性”。它采用人种学方法,包括访谈和参与者观察的数据收集,其次是定性内容和数据的叙事分析的应用。研究结果和反思表明,如果教育者能够创造一个贴近学生现实生活的创新问题解决和真实环境,大多数学生对激进建构主义学习的反应是积极的。本研究讨论的激进建构主义教学周期挑战了管理会计学生的思维模式,因为它改变了学生熟悉的传统客观主义学术学习方法。它使用定性方法促进了主动学习。作为定性设计的一部分,学生的反馈被寻求,这为学生和教育者从错误中学习和忘记提供了一个建设性的机制。这一过程丰富了学习者(学生)和教育者对激进建构主义管理会计教育成功参与的理解,并为设计未来的教学周期提供了基础。本文证明了会计教育者作为变革推动者的能力,通过创建与管理会计教育中创新的深度学习任务相关的新的建设性学习结构和文化,将激进的建构主义认识论与多种定性研究方法相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信