Critical friendship: an alternative, ‘care-full’ way to play the academic game

P. Sotiropoulou, S. Cranston
{"title":"Critical friendship: an alternative, ‘care-full’ way to play the academic game","authors":"P. Sotiropoulou, S. Cranston","doi":"10.1080/0966369X.2022.2069684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The severe impact of the neoliberal university has been commonly acknowledged, particularly for women academics. Feminist conceptualisations of academic work highlight that meaningful relationships in the workspace and care ethics in academia are practices of resistance against the neoliberal academy, including those of friendship and mentorship. In this paper, we add critical academic friendship to this repertoire of practices aligning with feminist care ethics and propose it as a way of working within the neoliberal academy slowly and meaningfully. Critical friendship is a practice often used by teacher educators to assist engagement in self-reflection and constructive critical dialogue among colleagues as a means to aid both personal and professional development. Inspired by our personal experience as critical academic friends and using an autoethnographic approach, the paper outlines how our critical friendship developed and was practiced. We highlight how time, space and neoliberal academic practices all influence how this relationship unfolded. Through showcasing how engaging in critical friendship helped us (re)produce robust feminist personal and professional identities, we hope to inspire more academics to share similar experiences, to intensify the message that engaging in ‘care-full’ relationships is paramount for resisting the pressures of neoliberal academic work and for ‘doing’ academia differently and more meaningfully.","PeriodicalId":12513,"journal":{"name":"Gender, Place & Culture","volume":"10 1","pages":"1104 - 1125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender, Place & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2022.2069684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The severe impact of the neoliberal university has been commonly acknowledged, particularly for women academics. Feminist conceptualisations of academic work highlight that meaningful relationships in the workspace and care ethics in academia are practices of resistance against the neoliberal academy, including those of friendship and mentorship. In this paper, we add critical academic friendship to this repertoire of practices aligning with feminist care ethics and propose it as a way of working within the neoliberal academy slowly and meaningfully. Critical friendship is a practice often used by teacher educators to assist engagement in self-reflection and constructive critical dialogue among colleagues as a means to aid both personal and professional development. Inspired by our personal experience as critical academic friends and using an autoethnographic approach, the paper outlines how our critical friendship developed and was practiced. We highlight how time, space and neoliberal academic practices all influence how this relationship unfolded. Through showcasing how engaging in critical friendship helped us (re)produce robust feminist personal and professional identities, we hope to inspire more academics to share similar experiences, to intensify the message that engaging in ‘care-full’ relationships is paramount for resisting the pressures of neoliberal academic work and for ‘doing’ academia differently and more meaningfully.
关键友谊:一种另类的、“谨慎”的学术游戏方式
新自由主义大学的严重影响已得到普遍承认,特别是对女性学者而言。学术工作的女权主义概念强调,工作场所中有意义的关系和学术界的关怀伦理是对新自由主义学术界的抵抗实践,包括友谊和指导。在本文中,我们将批判性的学术友谊添加到与女权主义关怀伦理相一致的实践中,并将其作为一种在新自由主义学院中缓慢而有意义的工作方式。批判性友谊是一种实践,经常被教师教育者用来帮助同事之间进行自我反思和建设性的批判性对话,作为帮助个人和职业发展的一种手段。受我们作为批判性学术朋友的个人经历的启发,并使用自我民族志方法,本文概述了我们的批判性友谊是如何发展和实践的。我们强调时间、空间和新自由主义的学术实践如何影响这种关系的展开。通过展示参与批判性友谊如何帮助我们(重新)产生强大的女性主义个人和职业身份,我们希望激励更多的学者分享类似的经历,强化这样的信息:参与“谨慎”的关系对于抵抗新自由主义学术工作的压力和“做”不同的、更有意义的学术是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信