“Why Are There So Many Women in Forensic Anthropology?”

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Finanzarchiv Pub Date : 2020-12-08 DOI:10.5744/fa.2020.3002
M. Pilloud, Nicholas V. Passalacqua
{"title":"“Why Are There So Many Women in Forensic Anthropology?”","authors":"M. Pilloud, Nicholas V. Passalacqua","doi":"10.5744/fa.2020.3002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is broad discussion of the higher numbers of women in the forensic sciences, particularly when compared to other science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields. In this discussion, we focus on forensic anthropology. We begin with an historical overview of the role of women in the discipline; data are then provided that outline the numbers of women scholars and practitioners over time. We then explore the different roles of men and women in regard to leadership positions, professional awards, awarded grant-funding, job hiring trends, presentations at the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) annual meeting, and publications in the Journal of Forensic Sciences. While the number of women in forensic anthropology is greatly increasing, the discipline has been slow to also grow the visibility of women in positions of leadership or to honor them with prestigious awards. One reason for this finding may be that women are subjected to bias and harassment, which may cause them to leave forensic anthropology at various points along the way, or lead to their contribution being less valued. These findings are discussed within the context of gendered expectations, and suggestions are provided on how to improve the retention of women as well as to diversify the discipline in general.","PeriodicalId":45063,"journal":{"name":"Finanzarchiv","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finanzarchiv","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/fa.2020.3002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is broad discussion of the higher numbers of women in the forensic sciences, particularly when compared to other science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields. In this discussion, we focus on forensic anthropology. We begin with an historical overview of the role of women in the discipline; data are then provided that outline the numbers of women scholars and practitioners over time. We then explore the different roles of men and women in regard to leadership positions, professional awards, awarded grant-funding, job hiring trends, presentations at the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) annual meeting, and publications in the Journal of Forensic Sciences. While the number of women in forensic anthropology is greatly increasing, the discipline has been slow to also grow the visibility of women in positions of leadership or to honor them with prestigious awards. One reason for this finding may be that women are subjected to bias and harassment, which may cause them to leave forensic anthropology at various points along the way, or lead to their contribution being less valued. These findings are discussed within the context of gendered expectations, and suggestions are provided on how to improve the retention of women as well as to diversify the discipline in general.
“为什么法医人类学有这么多女性?”
人们广泛讨论了法医科学中女性人数较多的问题,特别是与其他科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域相比。在这次讨论中,我们集中讨论法医人类学。我们从女性在这门学科中角色的历史概述开始;随后提供的数据概述了一段时间以来女性学者和实践者的数量。然后,我们探讨了男性和女性在领导职位、专业奖项、授予的资助、工作招聘趋势、在美国法医学学会(AAFS)年会上的演讲以及在法医学杂志上的出版物等方面的不同角色。虽然法医人类学中的女性人数正在大大增加,但这一学科在提高女性在领导岗位上的知名度或向她们颁发著名奖项方面进展缓慢。这一发现的一个原因可能是女性受到偏见和骚扰,这可能导致她们在不同的阶段离开法医人类学,或者导致她们的贡献不被重视。在性别期望的范围内讨论了这些调查结果,并就如何改善妇女的保留以及使整个学科多样化提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Finanzarchiv
Finanzarchiv Multiple-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信