Using SFL-based text analysis to inform instruction for emergent bilingual learners

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Dougherty, Joshua Schulze
{"title":"Using SFL-based text analysis to inform instruction for emergent bilingual learners","authors":"J. Dougherty, Joshua Schulze","doi":"10.54475/jlt.2023.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emergent Bilingual Learners (EBs) need language-focused instructional support if they are to access content, make meaning, and engage critically with academic texts in English. Text analysis informed by systemic functional linguistics (SFL) helps teachers identify “the language of schooling” (Schleppegrell, 2004) which they will need to make visible to their students. The authors, both teacher educators in an ESOL endorsement program, recognize that both the teacher candidates who are analyzing texts and the students whose instruction will be informed by the analysis engage in literacy practices that may not be recognized and valued by all teachers or aligned with the language demands of mandatory, high-stakes assessments. With that in mind, we envision a text analysis assignment that promotes language as meaning based, rather than rule based, and additive, rather than subtractive (Garcia, 2009) in terms of the language resources of teachers and students in language learning settings. Additionally, we look for ways to support our teacher candidates in interrogating texts critically as part of their analysis to uncover dominant perspectives. This practice-based article models the process of SFL-based text analysis facilitated by a text analysis tool we designed. The goal is that teachers can apply what they have learned from their analysis to create language-focused instruction that both supports academic language learning and promotes critical stances towards the connections between language choices and meaning making in specific academic contexts/disciplines. Additionally, we encourage teachers to use a variation of this text analysis format with students to explore how language is used in the text to develop all languages in the students' linguistic repertoire.","PeriodicalId":53931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Teaching and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2023.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emergent Bilingual Learners (EBs) need language-focused instructional support if they are to access content, make meaning, and engage critically with academic texts in English. Text analysis informed by systemic functional linguistics (SFL) helps teachers identify “the language of schooling” (Schleppegrell, 2004) which they will need to make visible to their students. The authors, both teacher educators in an ESOL endorsement program, recognize that both the teacher candidates who are analyzing texts and the students whose instruction will be informed by the analysis engage in literacy practices that may not be recognized and valued by all teachers or aligned with the language demands of mandatory, high-stakes assessments. With that in mind, we envision a text analysis assignment that promotes language as meaning based, rather than rule based, and additive, rather than subtractive (Garcia, 2009) in terms of the language resources of teachers and students in language learning settings. Additionally, we look for ways to support our teacher candidates in interrogating texts critically as part of their analysis to uncover dominant perspectives. This practice-based article models the process of SFL-based text analysis facilitated by a text analysis tool we designed. The goal is that teachers can apply what they have learned from their analysis to create language-focused instruction that both supports academic language learning and promotes critical stances towards the connections between language choices and meaning making in specific academic contexts/disciplines. Additionally, we encourage teachers to use a variation of this text analysis format with students to explore how language is used in the text to develop all languages in the students' linguistic repertoire.
运用基于sfl的文本分析为新兴双语学习者提供教学信息
新兴双语学习者(EBs)需要以语言为中心的教学支持,如果他们要访问内容,理解意义,并批判性地参与英语学术文本。基于系统功能语言学(SFL)的文本分析有助于教师识别“学校语言”(Schleppegrell, 2004),他们需要让学生看到这些语言。作者都是ESOL认可项目的教师教育工作者,他们认识到,无论是分析文本的教师候选人,还是通过分析获得教学信息的学生,他们所从事的读写实践都可能不被所有教师认可和重视,也不符合强制性、高风险评估的语言要求。考虑到这一点,我们设想了一种文本分析作业,在语言学习环境中,就教师和学生的语言资源而言,它促进语言以意义为基础,而不是以规则为基础,是加法,而不是减法(Garcia, 2009)。此外,我们寻找方法来支持我们的教师候选人批判性地询问文本,作为他们分析的一部分,以发现主导观点。这篇基于实践的文章通过我们设计的文本分析工具对基于sfl的文本分析过程进行了建模。目标是教师可以运用他们从分析中学到的知识来创建以语言为中心的教学,既支持学术语言学习,又促进对特定学术背景/学科中语言选择和意义形成之间联系的批判性立场。此外,我们鼓励教师与学生一起使用这种文本分析格式的变体,探索语言如何在文本中使用,以发展学生语言库中的所有语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Language Teaching and Learning
Journal of Language Teaching and Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信