The Spirituality of Hryhorii Skovoroda’s Work in Taras Zakydalsky’s Research

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY
M. Alchuk, A. Pavlyshyn
{"title":"The Spirituality of Hryhorii Skovoroda’s Work in Taras Zakydalsky’s Research","authors":"M. Alchuk, A. Pavlyshyn","doi":"10.15802/ampr.v0i21.260351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to introduce into scientific circulation works by Ukrainian scholar Taras Zakydalsky on the philosophy of Hryhorii Skovoroda. Taras Zakydalsky is a representative of the Ukrainian diaspora, philosopher, and member of Canadian NTSh (Shevchenko Scientific Society of Canada). Theoretical basis. We consider the uniqueness of H. Skovoroda’s philosophy, which stimulates not only intellectually but also spiritually enlightens the reader. The reasons for the complex perception and interpretation of Hryhorii Skovoroda’s philosophy are highlighted. We have verified the main methods of its interpretation given in the works by Dmytro Chyzhevskyi. The influence of philosophical thought of thinkers of Antiquity and the Middle Ages: Aristotle, Epicurus, the Church Fathers, and Tertullian has been studied. We have comprehended H. Skovoroda’s interpretation of the Bible as a two-layer existence, the symbolic world that makes the foundation of his philosophy. The peculiarity of the thinker’s division of the heart into \"internal\" and \"external\" is analyzed. Hryhorii Skovoroda’s position on the Good and the evil is stated. The Good is identified with God, and the evil – with the real world, the man can choose between the two. Much attention is paid to the understanding of man as a microcosm – rational thinking, and thought is the fundamental cause of human activity, which generates all existence. Hryhorii Skovoroda’s philosophy of metaphysics as the existence of three worlds is highlighted: the first is the macrocosm (the whole surrounding world), the second is the microcosm (the man), and the third is the symbolic world (the Bible). \"Monodualism\" as a characteristic feature of H. Skovoroda’s work is analyzed. We have highlighted H. Skovoroda’s attitude to the transcendence of God, which is not separated from the world but is present in it directly. The understanding of faith as a forced act of self-love is analyzed because by loving ourselves we love God. The criteria for true and false faith have been clarified. The significance of H. Skovoroda’s aphorism that what is necessary is useful, and not useful is unnecessary is considered. Examples of ethical principles in H. Skovoroda’s philosophy are considered. Peculiarities of the concept HAPPINESS are revealed. This concept is a universal means of existence of the Good, its source is gratitude to God. Originality of the article is in the systematic presentation of the philosophy of the heart by Hryhorii Skovoroda and the analysis of the integrity of the \"inner man\", the true meaning of life as interpreted by Taras Zakydalsky. Conclusions summarize the \"anthropological pragmatism\" of the philosopher, whose main idea is to apply practical skills for the benefit of society.","PeriodicalId":42650,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i21.260351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to introduce into scientific circulation works by Ukrainian scholar Taras Zakydalsky on the philosophy of Hryhorii Skovoroda. Taras Zakydalsky is a representative of the Ukrainian diaspora, philosopher, and member of Canadian NTSh (Shevchenko Scientific Society of Canada). Theoretical basis. We consider the uniqueness of H. Skovoroda’s philosophy, which stimulates not only intellectually but also spiritually enlightens the reader. The reasons for the complex perception and interpretation of Hryhorii Skovoroda’s philosophy are highlighted. We have verified the main methods of its interpretation given in the works by Dmytro Chyzhevskyi. The influence of philosophical thought of thinkers of Antiquity and the Middle Ages: Aristotle, Epicurus, the Church Fathers, and Tertullian has been studied. We have comprehended H. Skovoroda’s interpretation of the Bible as a two-layer existence, the symbolic world that makes the foundation of his philosophy. The peculiarity of the thinker’s division of the heart into "internal" and "external" is analyzed. Hryhorii Skovoroda’s position on the Good and the evil is stated. The Good is identified with God, and the evil – with the real world, the man can choose between the two. Much attention is paid to the understanding of man as a microcosm – rational thinking, and thought is the fundamental cause of human activity, which generates all existence. Hryhorii Skovoroda’s philosophy of metaphysics as the existence of three worlds is highlighted: the first is the macrocosm (the whole surrounding world), the second is the microcosm (the man), and the third is the symbolic world (the Bible). "Monodualism" as a characteristic feature of H. Skovoroda’s work is analyzed. We have highlighted H. Skovoroda’s attitude to the transcendence of God, which is not separated from the world but is present in it directly. The understanding of faith as a forced act of self-love is analyzed because by loving ourselves we love God. The criteria for true and false faith have been clarified. The significance of H. Skovoroda’s aphorism that what is necessary is useful, and not useful is unnecessary is considered. Examples of ethical principles in H. Skovoroda’s philosophy are considered. Peculiarities of the concept HAPPINESS are revealed. This concept is a universal means of existence of the Good, its source is gratitude to God. Originality of the article is in the systematic presentation of the philosophy of the heart by Hryhorii Skovoroda and the analysis of the integrity of the "inner man", the true meaning of life as interpreted by Taras Zakydalsky. Conclusions summarize the "anthropological pragmatism" of the philosopher, whose main idea is to apply practical skills for the benefit of society.
斯科沃罗达作品的精神性:塔拉斯·扎基达尔斯基的研究
本文的目的是将乌克兰学者塔拉斯·扎基达尔斯基关于斯科沃罗达哲学的著作引入科学流通。Taras Zakydalsky是乌克兰侨民的代表,哲学家,加拿大NTSh(加拿大舍甫琴科科学学会)成员。理论基础。我们认为斯科沃罗达哲学的独特性,不仅在智力上刺激,而且在精神上启发读者。强调了对斯科沃罗达哲学的复杂理解和解释的原因。我们验证了奇热夫斯基著作中给出的主要解释方法。古代和中世纪思想家的哲学思想的影响:亚里士多德,伊壁鸠鲁,教父,和德尔图良已经研究。我们已经理解了H. Skovoroda对圣经的解释,认为它是一个双层存在,象征世界是他哲学的基础。分析了思想家将心分为“内在”和“外在”的特点。阐述了Hryhorii Skovoroda对善与恶的立场。善与上帝等同,恶与现实世界等同,人可以在两者之间做出选择。人们把人理解为一个微观世界——理性思维,而思维是人类活动的根本原因,它产生了一切存在。突出了斯科沃罗达的形而上学哲学作为三个世界的存在:第一是宏观世界(整个周围世界),第二是微观世界(人),第三是象征世界(圣经)。“一元论”作为斯科沃罗达作品的一个特征进行了分析。我们已经强调了H. Skovoroda对上帝的超越性的态度,这种超越性不是与世界分离,而是直接存在于世界之中。对信仰的理解是一种被迫的自爱行为进行了分析,因为爱自己就是爱上帝。真假信仰的标准已经明确。H. Skovoroda的格言“必要的是有用的,无用的是不必要的”的意义被考虑。考虑了斯科沃罗达哲学中伦理原则的例子。揭示了幸福概念的特殊性。这种观念是善的普遍存在方式,它的源泉是对上帝的感激。本文的独创性在于系统地呈现了Hryhorii Skovoroda的心灵哲学,并分析了Taras Zakydalsky所解释的“内在人”的完整性,即生命的真正意义。结语部分总结了这位哲学家的“人类学实用主义”,其主要思想是运用实用技能造福社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信