A Split-Face Comparative Study in Efficacy and Safety between the Combination of 4% Niacinamide and 4% Kojic Acid Cream versus 4% Hydroquinone Cream for Epidermal Melasma

R. Hindritiani, Felly Nazlia, Nadia Octavia, Trustia Rizqandaru, D. Puspitosari, K. Ruchiatan
{"title":"A Split-Face Comparative Study in Efficacy and Safety between the Combination of 4% Niacinamide and 4% Kojic Acid Cream versus 4% Hydroquinone Cream for Epidermal Melasma","authors":"R. Hindritiani, Felly Nazlia, Nadia Octavia, Trustia Rizqandaru, D. Puspitosari, K. Ruchiatan","doi":"10.20473/bikk.v35.2.2023.93-99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Melasma is a hyperpigmentation disorder that affects the quality of life, especially in women. Hydroquinone has remained the mainstay of melasma treatment. However, its safety for long-term usage became a great concern. Combination therapy, such as niacinamide and kojic acid, can be used as an alternative melasma treatment due to different mechanisms of action and synergism. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a combination of 4% niacinamide and 4% kojic acid (N-K) vs. 4% hydroquinone (HQ) in epidermal melasma. Methods: This was a randomized, double blind, clinical study on 13 female epidermal melasma patients at the Cosmetic Dermatology Outpatient Clinic of Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung. Patients received two creams, a combination of N-K and HQ, for split-face therapy, regardless of the sides of the face. All patients were followed up at 4 and 8 weeks. The clinical efficacy was assessed for skin lightening effects using a spectrophotometer (L* value) and the melasma area severity index (MASI). Adverse effects were assessed in all patients. Result: Both the N-K and HQ groups showed significant improvement in skin lightening and MASI scores on week 8 (p <0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the N-K and HQ groups (p >0.05). None of the patients in the N-K group complained of any adverse effects. Whereas in the HQ group, 23.07% presented with pruritus and mild erythema.","PeriodicalId":8792,"journal":{"name":"Berkala Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkala Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/bikk.v35.2.2023.93-99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Melasma is a hyperpigmentation disorder that affects the quality of life, especially in women. Hydroquinone has remained the mainstay of melasma treatment. However, its safety for long-term usage became a great concern. Combination therapy, such as niacinamide and kojic acid, can be used as an alternative melasma treatment due to different mechanisms of action and synergism. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a combination of 4% niacinamide and 4% kojic acid (N-K) vs. 4% hydroquinone (HQ) in epidermal melasma. Methods: This was a randomized, double blind, clinical study on 13 female epidermal melasma patients at the Cosmetic Dermatology Outpatient Clinic of Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung. Patients received two creams, a combination of N-K and HQ, for split-face therapy, regardless of the sides of the face. All patients were followed up at 4 and 8 weeks. The clinical efficacy was assessed for skin lightening effects using a spectrophotometer (L* value) and the melasma area severity index (MASI). Adverse effects were assessed in all patients. Result: Both the N-K and HQ groups showed significant improvement in skin lightening and MASI scores on week 8 (p <0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the N-K and HQ groups (p >0.05). None of the patients in the N-K group complained of any adverse effects. Whereas in the HQ group, 23.07% presented with pruritus and mild erythema.
4%烟酰胺和4%曲酸乳膏与4%对苯二酚乳膏联合治疗表皮黄褐斑的疗效和安全性对比研究
背景:黄褐斑是一种影响生活质量的色素沉着症,尤其是女性。对苯二酚一直是治疗黄褐斑的主要药物。然而,其长期使用的安全性成为人们非常关注的问题。烟酰胺和曲酸联合治疗由于其作用机制和协同作用不同,可作为黄褐斑的替代治疗方法。目的:本研究的目的是比较4%烟酰胺和4%曲酸(N-K)与4%对苯二酚(HQ)联合治疗表皮黄褐斑的疗效和安全性。方法:这是一项随机、双盲的临床研究,研究对象是万隆哈桑·萨迪金医生医院美容皮肤科门诊的13名女性表皮黄褐斑患者。患者接受两种面霜,N-K和HQ的组合,用于面部分裂治疗,无论面部的两侧如何。所有患者均于第4周和第8周随访。采用分光光度计(L*值)和黄褐斑面积严重指数(MASI)评估临床疗效。对所有患者的不良反应进行评估。结果:N-K组和HQ组在第8周皮肤亮度和MASI评分均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。N-K组中没有患者抱怨有任何不良反应。而HQ组23.07%出现瘙痒和轻度红斑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信