Risk Conductors

Q4 Social Sciences
T. Macaulay
{"title":"Risk Conductors","authors":"T. Macaulay","doi":"10.1080/10658980601051409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Akin to sound resonating through a piano wire, impacts from both physical (flood, vandalism/sabotage, explosions, pandemics, etc.) and logical (network/software/data) incidents resonate between and through enterprises and business hierarchies via “risk conductors.” There are two orders of risk conductor: Critical Infrastructure (CI) as the industrial risk conductors, and intra-organizational operational risk conductors in the form of Human Factors (HF) and Information and Communication Technology (ICT). Risk conductors, either industrial or operational, are the dispersal agents of geographically centered, physical, or logical impacts. Critical infrastructures may transmit an impact from one enterprise to another throughout an economy. Operational risk conductors—HF and ICT—transmit horizontally within an enterprise from one business unit to another, potentially amplifying internal incidents from manageable to crisis/disaster proportions. Operational risk conductors may also transmit vertically, away from the enterprise up to the client base and downwards into the supply chain, transmitting impacts to both customers and partners/suppliers. Operational risk conductors are not necessarily a new phenomena, but they have taken on considerably greater significance under the rapid convergence of information and communication assets to Internet Protocol (IP), which has catalyzed a feedback-loop between HF and ICT. As an incident typically possesses both HF and ICT impacts, HF and ICT in turn impact each other, multiplying the scope and scale of the impact. In addition to presenting a framework for understanding and managing operational risks and resiliency, this paper proposes a cause-and-effect relationship between IP convergence and the materialization of operational risk conductors.","PeriodicalId":36738,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Systems Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Systems Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10658980601051409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Akin to sound resonating through a piano wire, impacts from both physical (flood, vandalism/sabotage, explosions, pandemics, etc.) and logical (network/software/data) incidents resonate between and through enterprises and business hierarchies via “risk conductors.” There are two orders of risk conductor: Critical Infrastructure (CI) as the industrial risk conductors, and intra-organizational operational risk conductors in the form of Human Factors (HF) and Information and Communication Technology (ICT). Risk conductors, either industrial or operational, are the dispersal agents of geographically centered, physical, or logical impacts. Critical infrastructures may transmit an impact from one enterprise to another throughout an economy. Operational risk conductors—HF and ICT—transmit horizontally within an enterprise from one business unit to another, potentially amplifying internal incidents from manageable to crisis/disaster proportions. Operational risk conductors may also transmit vertically, away from the enterprise up to the client base and downwards into the supply chain, transmitting impacts to both customers and partners/suppliers. Operational risk conductors are not necessarily a new phenomena, but they have taken on considerably greater significance under the rapid convergence of information and communication assets to Internet Protocol (IP), which has catalyzed a feedback-loop between HF and ICT. As an incident typically possesses both HF and ICT impacts, HF and ICT in turn impact each other, multiplying the scope and scale of the impact. In addition to presenting a framework for understanding and managing operational risks and resiliency, this paper proposes a cause-and-effect relationship between IP convergence and the materialization of operational risk conductors.
风险导体
类似于声音通过钢琴线产生共鸣,物理(洪水、破坏/破坏、爆炸、流行病等)和逻辑(网络/软件/数据)事件的影响通过“风险传导者”在企业和业务层次之间产生共鸣。风险导体分为两级:关键基础设施(CI)作为行业风险导体,组织内部操作风险导体以人为因素(HF)和信息通信技术(ICT)的形式存在。风险传导者,无论是工业的还是操作的,都是以地理为中心的、物理的或逻辑的影响的分散媒介。在整个经济中,关键的基础设施可能会将影响从一个企业传递到另一个企业。操作风险传导器——高频和信息通信技术——在企业内部从一个业务部门横向传播到另一个业务部门,潜在地将内部事件从可管理扩大到危机/灾难的比例。操作风险传导者也可能垂直传播,从企业向上传播到客户群,向下传播到供应链,将影响传递给客户和合作伙伴/供应商。操作风险导体不一定是一个新现象,但在信息和通信资产向互联网协议(IP)的快速融合下,它们具有相当大的意义,这促进了高频和ICT之间的反馈回路。由于一个事件通常同时具有高频和ICT的影响,因此高频和ICT相互影响,从而使影响的范围和规模成倍增加。除了提出理解和管理操作风险和弹性的框架外,本文还提出了IP融合与操作风险导体物质化之间的因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Information Systems Security
Journal of Information Systems Security Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信