Mechanical properties determination of dual-phase steels using uniaxial tensile and hydraulic bulge test

Rui Amaral , Abel D. Santosa , A.B. Lopes
{"title":"Mechanical properties determination of dual-phase steels using uniaxial tensile and hydraulic bulge test","authors":"Rui Amaral ,&nbsp;Abel D. Santosa ,&nbsp;A.B. Lopes","doi":"10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerical simulations of sheet metal forming processes need the establishment of highly reliable results, which in turn need the accurate identification of mechanical properties. In this paper a study is presented on the choice of the characterization function of flow stress-strain curve of sheet metal materials, as well as the selection of the best yield locus, based on experimental uniaxial tensile and biaxial hydraulic bulge tests performed on dual-phase steels of industrial interest. To obtain a better characterization of the hardening curve, a combination is made using the uniaxial tensile test data with biaxial hydraulic bulge test results, since bulge test covers a larger range of plastic strain when compared to tensile test. Since the two flow curves have different strain paths, they can’t be directly compared or combined. Therefore, it is necessary a transformation of flow stress-strain curve provided from biaxial bulge test into equivalent stress-strain curve. Different methodologies were applied to transform biaxial stress-strain curve to an equivalent one and the different results are compared and evaluated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10198,"journal":{"name":"Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais","volume":"29 1","pages":"Pages e239-e243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.007","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870831217300277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Numerical simulations of sheet metal forming processes need the establishment of highly reliable results, which in turn need the accurate identification of mechanical properties. In this paper a study is presented on the choice of the characterization function of flow stress-strain curve of sheet metal materials, as well as the selection of the best yield locus, based on experimental uniaxial tensile and biaxial hydraulic bulge tests performed on dual-phase steels of industrial interest. To obtain a better characterization of the hardening curve, a combination is made using the uniaxial tensile test data with biaxial hydraulic bulge test results, since bulge test covers a larger range of plastic strain when compared to tensile test. Since the two flow curves have different strain paths, they can’t be directly compared or combined. Therefore, it is necessary a transformation of flow stress-strain curve provided from biaxial bulge test into equivalent stress-strain curve. Different methodologies were applied to transform biaxial stress-strain curve to an equivalent one and the different results are compared and evaluated.

用单轴拉伸和水力膨胀试验测定双相钢的力学性能
板料成形过程的数值模拟需要建立高可靠性的结果,这反过来又需要准确的力学性能识别。本文通过对工业用双相钢进行的单轴拉伸和双轴水力膨胀试验,研究了金属板材流动应力-应变曲线表征函数的选择以及最佳屈服轨迹的选择。为了更好地表征硬化曲线,将单轴拉伸试验数据与双轴水力膨胀试验结果结合使用,因为与拉伸试验相比,膨胀试验涵盖了更大的塑性应变范围。由于两种流动曲线具有不同的应变路径,不能直接进行比较或组合。因此,有必要将双轴胀形试验提供的流动应力-应变曲线转化为等效应力-应变曲线。采用不同的方法将双轴应力-应变曲线转化为等效曲线,并对不同的结果进行了比较和评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信